Bifurcation of public opinion created by social media algorithms

A. Krylov
{"title":"Bifurcation of public opinion created by social media algorithms","authors":"A. Krylov","doi":"10.18500/0869-6632-2022-30-3-261-267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this work is to consider the possibility of nonlinear influence of social media algorithms to the users opinions. A social media inherent algorithm of information ranging interacts with the user inherent bias and that increases the positive feedback loop. The result of this interaction is receiving by the user the only one side of an opinion and the user looses the very possibility to receive the opposite information. The conditions for the society polarization by means of a social media are investigated. Methods. In this paper, a model of users opinions dynamics was studied. There are two types of user’s strategy was considered: strategy 1, when a user puts \"like\" on information with proximity to his own view, but differed in any direction; strategy 2, when a user puts \"like\" on information along his own view, but more strict. Results. It was shown that for strategy 1 the society comes to a consensus, but for strategy 2 the society polarizes to the two opposite views. Considering the mixed society, where both strategies are used, it was found that the bifurcation to the society polarization appears when there are more than 40% of people using strategy 2. Conclusion. The inherent algorithms of social media, which are created to adapt in coming information to the user’s interests, creates or amplifies the bias of the user’s opinion and locks the user in an information chamber of only one type. That effect is substantially created by the social media algorithm itself. Thus interaction of users within a social media may increase the polarization of a society more than if they would communicate offline.","PeriodicalId":41611,"journal":{"name":"Izvestiya Vysshikh Uchebnykh Zavedeniy-Prikladnaya Nelineynaya Dinamika","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Izvestiya Vysshikh Uchebnykh Zavedeniy-Prikladnaya Nelineynaya Dinamika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18500/0869-6632-2022-30-3-261-267","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this work is to consider the possibility of nonlinear influence of social media algorithms to the users opinions. A social media inherent algorithm of information ranging interacts with the user inherent bias and that increases the positive feedback loop. The result of this interaction is receiving by the user the only one side of an opinion and the user looses the very possibility to receive the opposite information. The conditions for the society polarization by means of a social media are investigated. Methods. In this paper, a model of users opinions dynamics was studied. There are two types of user’s strategy was considered: strategy 1, when a user puts "like" on information with proximity to his own view, but differed in any direction; strategy 2, when a user puts "like" on information along his own view, but more strict. Results. It was shown that for strategy 1 the society comes to a consensus, but for strategy 2 the society polarizes to the two opposite views. Considering the mixed society, where both strategies are used, it was found that the bifurcation to the society polarization appears when there are more than 40% of people using strategy 2. Conclusion. The inherent algorithms of social media, which are created to adapt in coming information to the user’s interests, creates or amplifies the bias of the user’s opinion and locks the user in an information chamber of only one type. That effect is substantially created by the social media algorithm itself. Thus interaction of users within a social media may increase the polarization of a society more than if they would communicate offline.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
由社交媒体算法造成的舆论分歧
本研究的目的是考虑社交媒体算法对用户意见产生非线性影响的可能性。社交媒体固有的信息测距算法与用户固有的偏见相互作用,从而增加了正反馈循环。这种互动的结果是用户只接收到观点的一面,而用户失去了接收相反信息的可能性。研究了社会媒体造成社会两极分化的条件。方法。本文研究了用户意见动态模型。这里考虑了两种类型的用户策略:策略1,当用户对与自己观点相近但方向不同的信息点赞时;策略二,当用户对信息按自己的观点点赞时,但更严格。结果。结果表明,对于策略1,社会达成了共识,而对于策略2,社会两极分化为两种相反的观点。考虑到混合社会,当两种策略都被使用时,我们发现当超过40%的人使用策略2时,社会两极分化就出现了。结论。社交媒体的固有算法是为了适应用户的兴趣而创建的,它创造或放大了用户意见的偏见,并将用户锁定在只有一种类型的信息室中。这种影响基本上是由社交媒体算法本身造成的。因此,用户在社交媒体上的互动可能比他们在线下交流更能增加社会的两极分化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
25.00%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: Scientific and technical journal Izvestiya VUZ. Applied Nonlinear Dynamics is an original interdisciplinary publication of wide focus. The journal is included in the List of periodic scientific and technical publications of the Russian Federation, recommended for doctoral thesis publications of State Commission for Academic Degrees and Titles at the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation, indexed by Scopus, RSCI. The journal is published in Russian (English articles are also acceptable, with the possibility of publishing selected articles in other languages by agreement with the editors), the articles data as well as abstracts, keywords and references are consistently translated into English. First and foremost the journal publishes original research in the following areas: -Nonlinear Waves. Solitons. Autowaves. Self-Organization. -Bifurcation in Dynamical Systems. Deterministic Chaos. Quantum Chaos. -Applied Problems of Nonlinear Oscillation and Wave Theory. -Modeling of Global Processes. Nonlinear Dynamics and Humanities. -Innovations in Applied Physics. -Nonlinear Dynamics and Neuroscience. All articles are consistently sent for independent, anonymous peer review by leading experts in the relevant fields, the decision to publish is made by the Editorial Board and is based on the review. In complicated and disputable cases it is possible to review the manuscript twice or three times. The journal publishes review papers, educational papers, related to the history of science and technology articles in the following sections: -Reviews of Actual Problems of Nonlinear Dynamics. -Science for Education. Methodical Papers. -History of Nonlinear Dynamics. Personalia.
期刊最新文献
80 years of Vladislav A. Tsarev 70 years of Sergey V. Gonchenko 40 years of Ilya V. Sysoev To the 85th anniversary of Dmitry Ivanovich Trubetskov On the anniversary of Sergei A. Kashchenko
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1