{"title":"The life and work Raoul Charles van Caenegem (1927-2018)","authors":"D. Heirbaut","doi":"10.1163/15718190-00874p01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article deals with the life and work of the Belgian legal historian R.C. van Caene em. It shows how van Caenegem's work was influenced by his teachers, first of all FrancoisLouis Ganshof, but also many others like Theodore Plucknett. Van Caenegem's research was very diverse and addressed different groups of readers, so that most of them only know a fragment of his work. Van Caenegem learned from Ganshof's mistakes. Unlike his master, van Caenegem took an interest in sociology and he did not hesitate to publish the grand overviews of history which Ganshof had stopped writing in the second half of his career. Many of van Caenegem'slmoks on English, medieval and legal history were a product of his teaching. Whereas the books for the students in Ghent, where van Caenegem was burdened by a heavy teaching load, presented a complete survey; the books for select groups of foreign students cherry-picked from legal history and took part in discussions on larger debates. Van Caenegem's many articles offer a better insight into his personal evolution from a scholar who started out as a jurist, but very soon lost interest in dogmatic legal history and preferred to investigate the lawmakers instead of the law itself. As a historian, van Caenegetn put the middle ages first, because in his opinion the middle ages laid the foundations for the modern rule of law. However, these 'modem' middle ages only started in the twelfth century. Although he claimed that the future of legal historical research lays in teamwork, van Caenegetn himself remained an indvidualistic scholar.","PeriodicalId":43053,"journal":{"name":"Tijdschrift Voor Rechtsgeschiedenis-Revue D Histoire Du Droit-The Legal History Review","volume":"30 1","pages":"309-350"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tijdschrift Voor Rechtsgeschiedenis-Revue D Histoire Du Droit-The Legal History Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718190-00874p01","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This article deals with the life and work of the Belgian legal historian R.C. van Caene em. It shows how van Caenegem's work was influenced by his teachers, first of all FrancoisLouis Ganshof, but also many others like Theodore Plucknett. Van Caenegem's research was very diverse and addressed different groups of readers, so that most of them only know a fragment of his work. Van Caenegem learned from Ganshof's mistakes. Unlike his master, van Caenegem took an interest in sociology and he did not hesitate to publish the grand overviews of history which Ganshof had stopped writing in the second half of his career. Many of van Caenegem'slmoks on English, medieval and legal history were a product of his teaching. Whereas the books for the students in Ghent, where van Caenegem was burdened by a heavy teaching load, presented a complete survey; the books for select groups of foreign students cherry-picked from legal history and took part in discussions on larger debates. Van Caenegem's many articles offer a better insight into his personal evolution from a scholar who started out as a jurist, but very soon lost interest in dogmatic legal history and preferred to investigate the lawmakers instead of the law itself. As a historian, van Caenegetn put the middle ages first, because in his opinion the middle ages laid the foundations for the modern rule of law. However, these 'modem' middle ages only started in the twelfth century. Although he claimed that the future of legal historical research lays in teamwork, van Caenegetn himself remained an indvidualistic scholar.
期刊介绍:
The Legal History Review, inspired by E.M. Meijers, is a peer-reviewed journal and was founded in 1918 by a number of Dutch jurists, who set out to stimulate scholarly interest in legal history in their own country and also to provide a centre for international cooperation in the subject. This has gradually through the years been achieved. The Review had already become one of the leading internationally known periodicals in the field before 1940. Since 1950 when it emerged under Belgo-Dutch editorship its position strengthened. Much attention is paid not only to the common foundations of the western legal tradition but also to the special, frequently divergent development of national law in the various countries belonging to, or influenced by it.