Inappropriate requests for tumor markers in patients aged 50 years and older: lessons not learned

Valter Paz Nascimento-Júnior, E. Camargos
{"title":"Inappropriate requests for tumor markers in patients aged 50 years and older: lessons not learned","authors":"Valter Paz Nascimento-Júnior, E. Camargos","doi":"10.5327/Z2447-212320212000113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE: To investigate, within a private health insurance, the ordering frequency and the costs related to inappropriate TM test orders. METHODS: This study analyzed data regarding TM requests within a private health insurance between 2010 and 2017. Patients included in this analysis were ≥ 50 years old, had available medical records, and had at least 1 TM tested within the study period. Tests were considered inappropriate when TMs were used in screening for neoplasms, ie, when there was no previous diagnosis. We evaluated data regarding age, sex, the ordering physician’s medical specialty, and test costs. RESULTS: Between 2010 and 2017, 1,112 TM tests were performed and increased from 52 to 262 per year. Our sample consisted mostly of women (69.50%) with a mean age of 59.40 (SD, 8.20) years. Most orders were inappropriate (87.80%) and represented 79.40% of all expenses with TM tests. Cardiology professionals were the medical specialty that requested the most TM tests (23.90%), followed by internal medicine specialists (22.70%) and gynecologists (19.20%). CONCLUSIONS: We observed a high percentage of inappropriate test orders in the study period, resulting in elevated costs. Studies of this nature deserve the attention of health care managers, and interventions should be performed in order to reduce the inappropriate use of TM tests in clinical practice.","PeriodicalId":52782,"journal":{"name":"Geriatrics Gerontology and Aging","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geriatrics Gerontology and Aging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5327/Z2447-212320212000113","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate, within a private health insurance, the ordering frequency and the costs related to inappropriate TM test orders. METHODS: This study analyzed data regarding TM requests within a private health insurance between 2010 and 2017. Patients included in this analysis were ≥ 50 years old, had available medical records, and had at least 1 TM tested within the study period. Tests were considered inappropriate when TMs were used in screening for neoplasms, ie, when there was no previous diagnosis. We evaluated data regarding age, sex, the ordering physician’s medical specialty, and test costs. RESULTS: Between 2010 and 2017, 1,112 TM tests were performed and increased from 52 to 262 per year. Our sample consisted mostly of women (69.50%) with a mean age of 59.40 (SD, 8.20) years. Most orders were inappropriate (87.80%) and represented 79.40% of all expenses with TM tests. Cardiology professionals were the medical specialty that requested the most TM tests (23.90%), followed by internal medicine specialists (22.70%) and gynecologists (19.20%). CONCLUSIONS: We observed a high percentage of inappropriate test orders in the study period, resulting in elevated costs. Studies of this nature deserve the attention of health care managers, and interventions should be performed in order to reduce the inappropriate use of TM tests in clinical practice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
50岁及以上患者对肿瘤标志物的不当要求:未吸取的教训
目的:调查在私人医疗保险范围内,订购频率和与不适当的TM测试订单相关的成本。方法:本研究分析了2010年至2017年私人健康保险内TM请求的数据。纳入该分析的患者年龄≥50岁,有可用的医疗记录,并且在研究期间至少进行过一次TM检测。当TMs用于肿瘤筛查时,即没有先前的诊断时,检测被认为是不合适的。我们评估了有关年龄、性别、下单医生的医学专业和检测费用的数据。结果:2010年至2017年间,进行了1112次TM检测,并从每年52次增加到262次。我们的样本主要由女性组成(69.50%),平均年龄为59.40 (SD, 8.20)岁。大多数订单是不合适的(87.80%),占所有TM检测费用的79.40%。要求进行TM检测最多的医学专业是心脏病科(23.90%),其次是内科(22.70%)和妇科(19.20%)。结论:我们观察到,在研究期间,不适当的测试订单比例很高,导致成本上升。这种性质的研究值得卫生保健管理人员的注意,并应采取干预措施,以减少在临床实践中不适当使用TM测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Polypharmacy and drug classes in fall risk among older adults Videoconference assessment of functional and cognitive measures in Brazilian older adults: a reliability and feasibility study Oral disorders among older Chileans: prevalence, incidence, and years lived with disability Interventions used by health professionals in older adults with low levels of health literacy: a scoping review Oral health-related quality of life of older adults living in long-term care facilities and its association with dental prosthesis use and condition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1