Developing a performance framework for measuring comprehensive, community-based primary healthcare for people with HIV

S. Johnston, Matthew Hogel, A. Burchell, Gabriel Rebick, T. Antoniou, Meaghan McLaren, M. Loutfy, C. Liddy, C. Kendall
{"title":"Developing a performance framework for measuring comprehensive, community-based primary healthcare for people with HIV","authors":"S. Johnston, Matthew Hogel, A. Burchell, Gabriel Rebick, T. Antoniou, Meaghan McLaren, M. Loutfy, C. Liddy, C. Kendall","doi":"10.1017/S1463423615000572","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives People with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) are living longer lives and like many other patients, need a health system better adapted for the management of complex chronic conditions. A key element of system transformation is measuring and reporting on system performance indicators relevant to the different stakeholders. Our objective was to produce a performance measurement framework for assessing the quality of comprehensive community-based primary healthcare for people with HIV. Methods Semi-structured interviews were performed with HIV providers, advocates, and policy-makers to obtain input on a draft performance framework, constructed using existing HIV-specific indicators, as well as the use of performance data in improving care for people with HIV. Results Stakeholders were overwhelmingly supportive of the framework’s comprehensiveness. Many noted the absence of indicators addressing social determinants of health and had mixed opinions on the importance of indicators addressing access to after-hours care and the frequency of routine screening for behavioural risk factors. The draft framework was modified to reflect stakeholder input, triangulated against expert opinion and recently released HIV care guidelines, and finalized at 79 indicators. The resources and infrastructure to collect and use performance data will have to be improved for performance measurement to contribute to improving care for people with HIV. Conclusions This framework presents a comprehensive though not exhaustive tool to support performance measurement and improvement in the care for people with HIV. However, advances in data collection and use across the system will be needed to support performance measurement driving quality improvement.","PeriodicalId":20471,"journal":{"name":"Primary Health Care Research & Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Primary Health Care Research & Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1463423615000572","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Objectives People with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) are living longer lives and like many other patients, need a health system better adapted for the management of complex chronic conditions. A key element of system transformation is measuring and reporting on system performance indicators relevant to the different stakeholders. Our objective was to produce a performance measurement framework for assessing the quality of comprehensive community-based primary healthcare for people with HIV. Methods Semi-structured interviews were performed with HIV providers, advocates, and policy-makers to obtain input on a draft performance framework, constructed using existing HIV-specific indicators, as well as the use of performance data in improving care for people with HIV. Results Stakeholders were overwhelmingly supportive of the framework’s comprehensiveness. Many noted the absence of indicators addressing social determinants of health and had mixed opinions on the importance of indicators addressing access to after-hours care and the frequency of routine screening for behavioural risk factors. The draft framework was modified to reflect stakeholder input, triangulated against expert opinion and recently released HIV care guidelines, and finalized at 79 indicators. The resources and infrastructure to collect and use performance data will have to be improved for performance measurement to contribute to improving care for people with HIV. Conclusions This framework presents a comprehensive though not exhaustive tool to support performance measurement and improvement in the care for people with HIV. However, advances in data collection and use across the system will be needed to support performance measurement driving quality improvement.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
制定绩效框架,以衡量为艾滋病毒感染者提供的全面、基于社区的初级保健服务
人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)感染者的寿命越来越长,与许多其他患者一样,需要一个更适合管理复杂慢性疾病的卫生系统。系统转换的一个关键要素是测量和报告与不同涉众相关的系统性能指标。我们的目标是制定一个绩效衡量框架,以评估艾滋病毒感染者社区综合初级保健的质量。方法对艾滋病毒服务提供者、倡导者和政策制定者进行半结构化访谈,以获取对绩效框架草案的投入,该框架使用现有的艾滋病毒特定指标构建,并使用绩效数据改善对艾滋病毒感染者的护理。利益相关者压倒性地支持该框架的全面性。许多人注意到缺乏涉及健康的社会决定因素的指标,并对涉及获得下班后护理机会的指标的重要性和对行为风险因素进行例行筛查的频率的问题持不同意见。对框架草案进行了修改,以反映利益攸关方的意见,根据专家意见和最近发布的艾滋病毒护理指南进行了三角测量,并最终确定了79项指标。必须改善收集和使用绩效数据的资源和基础设施,以便对绩效进行衡量,从而有助于改善对艾滋病毒感染者的护理。该框架提供了一个全面但不详尽的工具,以支持对艾滋病毒感染者护理的绩效衡量和改进。然而,需要在整个系统的数据收集和使用方面取得进展,以支持绩效衡量驱动质量改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Health risk appraisal in older people 7: long-acting benzodiazepine use in community-dwelling older adults in London: is it related to physical or psychological factors? Collaborative Care model in mental health. Scope and experiences after three years of activity in Mexico City Health team for the elderly: a feasibility study for preventive home visits Primary care and the public’s health: evidence from service development initiatives Perception of measures for dealing with Ebola disease in primary care
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1