Exploring young child feeding practices & perceptions in Tower Hamlets, with a focus on sugar

R. Keith, C. Baker, Lauren Senior, A. Adegboye
{"title":"Exploring young child feeding practices & perceptions in Tower Hamlets, with a focus on sugar","authors":"R. Keith, C. Baker, Lauren Senior, A. Adegboye","doi":"10.26596/wn.202213188-107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The aim of this qualitative research was to gain a greater understanding of the factors that influence young child feeding perceptions and practices in families with children under the age of five years old in London Borough of Tower Hamlets, in the context of rising childhood obesity levels in England. \nMethodology: The target group were mothers with children under five, mother in laws, service providers and carers. The participants were selected using purposeful, convenience and snowball sampling methods. Data were collected from 21 key informant interviews, 2 direct observations of health promotion sessions and 18 focus groups. The focus group discussions included 119 participants: 95 women who were mothers, 3 mother in laws and 21 service providers. A thematic analysis was used to identify four themes: knowledge not leading to changes, communication challenges, barriers to improving family healthy eating practices, and the lack of public health nutrition services. \nFindings:  Knowledge had not led to behaviour change: Participants demonstrated high levels of knowledge on what constitutes healthy eating such as increasing the amount of fruit and vegetables their children eat while reducing sugar, salt and fat intake. Information was sought mainly from the internet, friends and family, but participants would prefer a one-to-one session with a health worker. \nCommunication challenges: Misleading messages negatively affected food choices. Participants raised the problem of mixed messages regarding what was a healthy snack, as many food labels targeting young children carry misleading health claims such as “two of your five a day” or “organic,” despite having extremely high levels of sugar.   \nBarriers to improving family healthy eating practices: The challenges experienced when trying to improve their children’s eating habits included the cost of healthy food options, the lack of time to buy and prepare healthy options, unhealthy treats given by family and friends, and the unhealthy takeaway food environment. \nLack of public health nutrition services and support: There was a lack of clarity regarding who mothers and service providers should refer to regarding nutrition problems such as fussy eating, portion sizes, and diet diversity. Half of the early years’ service providers that were interviewed had no training on healthy eating guidelines, although training had been planned. Parents did not think the sugar tax would have a significant impact on the consumption of sugar or on childhood obesity levels.","PeriodicalId":23779,"journal":{"name":"World review of nutrition and dietetics","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World review of nutrition and dietetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26596/wn.202213188-107","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this qualitative research was to gain a greater understanding of the factors that influence young child feeding perceptions and practices in families with children under the age of five years old in London Borough of Tower Hamlets, in the context of rising childhood obesity levels in England. Methodology: The target group were mothers with children under five, mother in laws, service providers and carers. The participants were selected using purposeful, convenience and snowball sampling methods. Data were collected from 21 key informant interviews, 2 direct observations of health promotion sessions and 18 focus groups. The focus group discussions included 119 participants: 95 women who were mothers, 3 mother in laws and 21 service providers. A thematic analysis was used to identify four themes: knowledge not leading to changes, communication challenges, barriers to improving family healthy eating practices, and the lack of public health nutrition services. Findings:  Knowledge had not led to behaviour change: Participants demonstrated high levels of knowledge on what constitutes healthy eating such as increasing the amount of fruit and vegetables their children eat while reducing sugar, salt and fat intake. Information was sought mainly from the internet, friends and family, but participants would prefer a one-to-one session with a health worker. Communication challenges: Misleading messages negatively affected food choices. Participants raised the problem of mixed messages regarding what was a healthy snack, as many food labels targeting young children carry misleading health claims such as “two of your five a day” or “organic,” despite having extremely high levels of sugar.   Barriers to improving family healthy eating practices: The challenges experienced when trying to improve their children’s eating habits included the cost of healthy food options, the lack of time to buy and prepare healthy options, unhealthy treats given by family and friends, and the unhealthy takeaway food environment. Lack of public health nutrition services and support: There was a lack of clarity regarding who mothers and service providers should refer to regarding nutrition problems such as fussy eating, portion sizes, and diet diversity. Half of the early years’ service providers that were interviewed had no training on healthy eating guidelines, although training had been planned. Parents did not think the sugar tax would have a significant impact on the consumption of sugar or on childhood obesity levels.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索陶尔哈姆莱茨的幼儿喂养实践和观念,重点是糖
简介:本定性研究的目的是在英国儿童肥胖水平上升的背景下,更深入地了解影响伦敦陶尔哈姆莱茨区5岁以下儿童家庭喂养观念和做法的因素。方法:调查对象为有5岁以下儿童的母亲、婆婆、服务提供者和护理人员。参与者的选择采用目的性、便捷性和滚雪球抽样法。数据收集自21个关键信息提供者访谈、2个健康促进会议的直接观察和18个焦点小组。焦点小组讨论包括119名参与者:95名母亲、3名婆婆和21名服务提供者。专题分析确定了四个主题:知识不能带来变化、沟通方面的挑战、改善家庭健康饮食习惯的障碍以及缺乏公共卫生营养服务。研究发现:知识并没有导致行为的改变:参与者对健康饮食的构成有很高的认识,比如增加孩子吃的水果和蔬菜的量,同时减少糖、盐和脂肪的摄入量。信息主要来自互联网、朋友和家人,但参与者更愿意与卫生工作者进行一对一的交流。沟通挑战:误导性信息对食物选择产生负面影响。参与者提出了关于什么是健康零食的混淆信息的问题,因为许多针对幼儿的食品标签带有误导性的健康声明,如“每天五份中的两份”或“有机”,尽管含糖量极高。改善家庭健康饮食习惯的障碍:在试图改善孩子的饮食习惯时遇到的挑战包括健康食品选择的成本,没有时间购买和准备健康食品,家人和朋友给予不健康的食物,以及不健康的外卖食品环境。缺乏公共卫生营养服务和支持:关于挑食、份量和饮食多样性等营养问题,母亲和服务提供者应向谁咨询,目前尚不明确。在接受采访的早期服务提供者中,有一半没有接受过健康饮食指南方面的培训,尽管培训是有计划的。家长们并不认为糖税会对糖的消费量或儿童肥胖水平产生重大影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
World review of nutrition and dietetics
World review of nutrition and dietetics Nursing-Nutrition and Dietetics
自引率
0.00%
发文量
114
期刊介绍: Volumes in this series consist of exceptionally thorough reviews on topics selected as either fundamental to improved understanding of human and animal nutrition, useful in resolving present controversies, or relevant to problems of social and preventive medicine that depend for their solution on progress in nutrition. Many of the individual articles have been judged as among the most comprehensive reviews ever published on the given topic. Since the first volume appeared in 1959, the series has earned repeated praise for the quality of its scholarship and the reputation of its authors.
期刊最新文献
Cognition. Early Nutrition and Its Effect on Growth, Body Composition, and Later Obesity. Epigenetic DNA Methylation, Nutrition, and Growth. Malnutrition and Catch-Up Growth During Childhood and Puberty. Nutrition and Growth in Chronic Diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1