Artificial Insemination: Coverage and Constraints in Central High Land of Ethiopia

T. K., A. Y., Habtamu A.
{"title":"Artificial Insemination: Coverage and Constraints in Central High Land of Ethiopia","authors":"T. K., A. Y., Habtamu A.","doi":"10.11648/j.avs.20210905.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": A cross-sectional and retrospective investigation was conducted from November, 2017 to April, 2018 with objective of assessing service coverage and constraints that were affecting Artificial Insemination (AI), success rate in Welmera District, special Zone of Oromiya Regional State. Semi-structured questionnaires were pretested and administered to 395 respondents that were composed of a group small-holder dairy farmers (n=384), animal health and production professionals (AHPPs) (n=8) and artificial inseminations technicians (AITs) (n=3). Additionally retrospective data from 2011 to 2017 was considered to evaluate the previous situation of AI services in study site. The survey result showed that from 384 interviewed farmers; majority of them 71.1%, (273) didn’t use AI, 18.8% (72) used both AI and natural breeding, while 10.2% (39) used solely AI services to breed their cows. The distribution of AI services between small-holders located in urban, per-urban and rural localities in the study area was 78.95%, 46.25% and 12.88% respectively, with statistically significant difference (p<0.05). Many farmers (273) solely depended on natural breeding than using artificial insemination due to lack of awareness (27.7%), unfitness of their dairy cows for AI breeding (26.4%), long distance from AI center (24.4%), insufficient capital (13.3%) and shortage of feed (8.1%) to keep dairy cows. The major constraints among AI users were shortage of inputs 7.1%, unavailability of AI technicians 13.4% and conception failure 50.9%. In Wolemera district many farmers 73.3% used to take their cows to AI station for services while 26.7% call-up to technicians to have them at their farm gate for AI services. Generally from this study it was concluded that AI service coverage was inadequate with unequal distributions between small-holders in urban, peri- urban and rural localities. Therefore, AI service in the district requires serious attention so that appropriate solutions be given to alleviate the prevailing constraints.","PeriodicalId":7842,"journal":{"name":"Animal and Veterinary Sciences","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal and Veterinary Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11648/j.avs.20210905.15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

: A cross-sectional and retrospective investigation was conducted from November, 2017 to April, 2018 with objective of assessing service coverage and constraints that were affecting Artificial Insemination (AI), success rate in Welmera District, special Zone of Oromiya Regional State. Semi-structured questionnaires were pretested and administered to 395 respondents that were composed of a group small-holder dairy farmers (n=384), animal health and production professionals (AHPPs) (n=8) and artificial inseminations technicians (AITs) (n=3). Additionally retrospective data from 2011 to 2017 was considered to evaluate the previous situation of AI services in study site. The survey result showed that from 384 interviewed farmers; majority of them 71.1%, (273) didn’t use AI, 18.8% (72) used both AI and natural breeding, while 10.2% (39) used solely AI services to breed their cows. The distribution of AI services between small-holders located in urban, per-urban and rural localities in the study area was 78.95%, 46.25% and 12.88% respectively, with statistically significant difference (p<0.05). Many farmers (273) solely depended on natural breeding than using artificial insemination due to lack of awareness (27.7%), unfitness of their dairy cows for AI breeding (26.4%), long distance from AI center (24.4%), insufficient capital (13.3%) and shortage of feed (8.1%) to keep dairy cows. The major constraints among AI users were shortage of inputs 7.1%, unavailability of AI technicians 13.4% and conception failure 50.9%. In Wolemera district many farmers 73.3% used to take their cows to AI station for services while 26.7% call-up to technicians to have them at their farm gate for AI services. Generally from this study it was concluded that AI service coverage was inadequate with unequal distributions between small-holders in urban, peri- urban and rural localities. Therefore, AI service in the district requires serious attention so that appropriate solutions be given to alleviate the prevailing constraints.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人工授精:在埃塞俄比亚中部高地的覆盖和限制
2017年11月至2018年4月,对奥罗米亚州特区Welmera区的人工授精服务覆盖率及影响人工授精成功率的制约因素进行了横断面和回顾性调查。对395名受访者进行了半结构化问卷预测和管理,其中包括小农奶农(384人)、动物卫生和生产专业人员(AHPPs)(8人)和人工授精技术人员(ait)(3人)。此外,还考虑了2011年至2017年的回顾性数据,以评估研究地点人工智能服务的既往情况。调查结果显示,384名受访农民;其中71.1%(273家)没有使用人工智能,18.8%(72家)同时使用人工智能和自然育种,10.2%(39家)仅使用人工智能服务来繁殖奶牛。研究区城市小农、城市小农和农村小农的人工智能服务分布分别为78.95%、46.25%和12.88%,差异有统计学意义(p<0.05)。由于缺乏对人工智能育种的认识(27.7%)、奶牛不适合人工智能育种(26.4%)、距离人工智能中心较远(24.4%)、资金不足(13.3%)和饲料短缺(8.1%),许多农民(273)完全依赖自然育种而不是人工授精。人工智能用户的主要制约因素是投入不足(7.1%)、无法获得人工智能技术人员(13.4%)和受孕失败(50.9%)。在Wolemera地区,73.3%的农民过去常常把他们的奶牛带到人工智能站接受服务,而26.7%的农民打电话给技术人员,让他们在农场门口接受人工智能服务。总的来说,从这项研究中得出的结论是,人工智能服务覆盖率不足,城市、城郊和农村地区的小农之间分布不均。因此,该地区的人工智能服务需要高度重视,以便提供适当的解决方案,以缓解当前的制约因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Husbandry Practices of Indigenous Goats Types in South West Shewa Zone, Oromia, Ethiopia Antimicrobials Use by Smallholder Dairy Farmers in Peri-Urban Area of Nakuru Kenya: Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices Effect of Diets Containing Dried Cashew Apple Pulp (Anarcadium occidentale) on Local Pigs Health Status via Biochemical and Hematological Parameters in South’s Senegal Honey Physiochemical Properties and Factors Associated with Honey Quality in Ethiopia: A Review Effects of Guanidinoacetic Acid (GAA) Supplementation on Zootechnical Performance and Biochemical Parameters of Broiler Chickens in Dakar Region, Senegal
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1