Machine learning and regression models to predict multiple tree stem volumes for teak

Ivaldo da Silva Tavares Júnior, Jianne Rafaela Mazzini de Souza, L. S. D. S. Lopes, L. Fardin, G. G. Casas, Ricardo Rodrigues de Oliveira Neto, R. Leite, H. Leite
{"title":"Machine learning and regression models to predict multiple tree stem volumes for teak","authors":"Ivaldo da Silva Tavares Júnior, Jianne Rafaela Mazzini de Souza, L. S. D. S. Lopes, L. Fardin, G. G. Casas, Ricardo Rodrigues de Oliveira Neto, R. Leite, H. Leite","doi":"10.2989/20702620.2021.1994345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The quantification of a stand’s wood stock is one of the most important procedures for Tectona spp. (teak) management. An optimal method for estimating tree volume must accommodate the variation of the data collected in the inventory. This study evaluated alternative methods to estimate the volume on stems of teak trees. We cut and measured the outside bark, inside bark, and heartwood diameters at heights of 0.1, 0.5, 1.5 m and every meter thereafter until the minimum outside bark diameter reached 3 cm, using 180 trees of ages 3 to 12 years. We tested two approaches (A1 and A2) to estimate stem volumes of the outside bark, inside bark, and heartwood (v ob, v ib and v hw, respectively): modelling the tree volume in A1, and the taper model in A2, with the techniques of regression, artificial neural network (ANN) and support vector regression (SVR). In addition, we obtained the percentages of heartwood, sapwood and bark in the stem. The accuracies of the estimates were evaluated using bias, correlation and root-mean-square error (RMSE). Validation was made for the outside bark, inside bark and heartwood volumes, and the outside bark, inside bark and heartwood diameters, from the taper models. In A1, the ANN technique more accurately predicted v ob and v ib, with RMSE% values of 18.88% and 18.54%, respectively; for v hw, the regression technique was more accurate, with RMSE% equal to 26.87%. In A2, the regression technique obtained the highest precision in the prediction of v ob, v ib and v hw, with RMSE% values of 13.99%, 13.31% and 26.50%, respectively. Approach A2 showed more accurate results compared with A1 for predicting the multiple volumes of teak trees with the three tested techniques.","PeriodicalId":21939,"journal":{"name":"Southern Forests: a Journal of Forest Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southern Forests: a Journal of Forest Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2989/20702620.2021.1994345","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The quantification of a stand’s wood stock is one of the most important procedures for Tectona spp. (teak) management. An optimal method for estimating tree volume must accommodate the variation of the data collected in the inventory. This study evaluated alternative methods to estimate the volume on stems of teak trees. We cut and measured the outside bark, inside bark, and heartwood diameters at heights of 0.1, 0.5, 1.5 m and every meter thereafter until the minimum outside bark diameter reached 3 cm, using 180 trees of ages 3 to 12 years. We tested two approaches (A1 and A2) to estimate stem volumes of the outside bark, inside bark, and heartwood (v ob, v ib and v hw, respectively): modelling the tree volume in A1, and the taper model in A2, with the techniques of regression, artificial neural network (ANN) and support vector regression (SVR). In addition, we obtained the percentages of heartwood, sapwood and bark in the stem. The accuracies of the estimates were evaluated using bias, correlation and root-mean-square error (RMSE). Validation was made for the outside bark, inside bark and heartwood volumes, and the outside bark, inside bark and heartwood diameters, from the taper models. In A1, the ANN technique more accurately predicted v ob and v ib, with RMSE% values of 18.88% and 18.54%, respectively; for v hw, the regression technique was more accurate, with RMSE% equal to 26.87%. In A2, the regression technique obtained the highest precision in the prediction of v ob, v ib and v hw, with RMSE% values of 13.99%, 13.31% and 26.50%, respectively. Approach A2 showed more accurate results compared with A1 for predicting the multiple volumes of teak trees with the three tested techniques.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用机器学习和回归模型预测柚木的多棵树干体积
林分木材存量的量化是柚木管理的重要环节之一。估算树木体积的最佳方法必须适应在库存中收集的数据的变化。本研究评估了几种估算柚木茎部体积的方法。我们选取了180棵3 ~ 12年树龄的树木,分别在0.1、0.5、1.5 m高度和之后每隔1米高度进行了外树皮、内树皮和心材直径的切割和测量,直到最小外树皮直径达到3 cm。我们测试了两种方法(A1和A2)来估计外树皮、内树皮和心材(分别为v ob、v ib和v hw)的茎体积:在A1中建模树木体积,在A2中使用回归、人工神经网络(ANN)和支持向量回归(SVR)技术建立锥度模型。此外,我们还得到了茎中心材、边材和树皮的百分比。使用偏倚、相关性和均方根误差(RMSE)评估估计的准确性。从锥度模型中验证了外部树皮、内部树皮和心材的体积,以及外部树皮、内部树皮和心材的直径。在A1中,人工神经网络技术更准确地预测了v ob和v ib, RMSE%值分别为18.88%和18.54%;对于vhw,回归技术更为准确,RMSE% = 26.87%。在A2中,回归技术对v ob、v ib和v hw的预测精度最高,RMSE%分别为13.99%、13.31%和26.50%。方法A2与方法A1相比,三种方法预测柚木的倍数体积的结果更为准确。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Changes in anatomical characteristics of Falcataria moluccana wood due to Uromycladium tepperianum infection Changes in protein expression in Acacia mearnsii De Wild (black wattle) as a result of exposure to frost-inducing temperatures Evidence-based global yield benchmarks in unthinned industrial plantation eucalypts Biomass production and nutritional efficiency in short rotation eucalypt clone plantations for energy in north-east Brazil Growth and adaptability of provenances and progenies of Pinus maximinoi H.E.Moore in northern Mozambique
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1