Effectiveness of Small-Group Learning Pedagogies in Engineering and Technology Education: A Meta-Analysis

Q3 Social Sciences Journal of Technology Education Pub Date : 2018-06-08 DOI:10.21061/JTE.V29I2.A.2
Sema A. Kalaian, Rafa M. Kasim, Julia K. Nims
{"title":"Effectiveness of Small-Group Learning Pedagogies in Engineering and Technology Education: A Meta-Analysis","authors":"Sema A. Kalaian, Rafa M. Kasim, Julia K. Nims","doi":"10.21061/JTE.V29I2.A.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study reports the results of a meta-analysis synthesizing the available literature on the effectiveness of various forms of small-group learning methods on the academic achievement of college students in undergraduate engineering and technology classrooms. The meta-analytic results showed that cooperative learning, collaborative learning, problem-based learning, and peer-led team learning pedagogies were studied in college technology and engineering classrooms. The results also revealed that most of the primary studies supported the effectiveness of the small-group learning methods in improving students’ academic achievement with an overall positive weighted average effect size of 0.45 in standard deviation units favoring small-group learning methods. The findings might help engineering and technology instructors and educators by providing guidance in identifying the conditions under which various forms of innovative small-group pedagogies are more effective than the traditional lecture-based teaching and individualized instruction.","PeriodicalId":39755,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Technology Education","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"25","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Technology Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21061/JTE.V29I2.A.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

Abstract

This study reports the results of a meta-analysis synthesizing the available literature on the effectiveness of various forms of small-group learning methods on the academic achievement of college students in undergraduate engineering and technology classrooms. The meta-analytic results showed that cooperative learning, collaborative learning, problem-based learning, and peer-led team learning pedagogies were studied in college technology and engineering classrooms. The results also revealed that most of the primary studies supported the effectiveness of the small-group learning methods in improving students’ academic achievement with an overall positive weighted average effect size of 0.45 in standard deviation units favoring small-group learning methods. The findings might help engineering and technology instructors and educators by providing guidance in identifying the conditions under which various forms of innovative small-group pedagogies are more effective than the traditional lecture-based teaching and individualized instruction.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
小组学习教学法在工程技术教育中的有效性:一项元分析
本研究报告了一项综合现有文献的荟萃分析结果,研究了各种形式的小组学习方法对本科工程和技术课堂上大学生学业成绩的有效性。元分析结果显示,合作学习、协作学习、基于问题的学习和同伴领导的团队学习教学法在大学技术与工程课堂中被研究。结果还显示,大多数初步研究支持小组学习方法在提高学生学业成绩方面的有效性,总体正加权平均效应量为0.45(标准差单位),有利于小组学习方法。研究结果可能有助于工程技术教师和教育工作者,为确定各种形式的创新小组教学法比传统的基于讲座的教学和个性化教学更有效的条件提供指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Technology Education
Journal of Technology Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
34 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Technology Education provides a forum for scholarly discussion on topics relating to technology education. Manuscripts should focus on technology education research, philosophy, and theory. In addition, the Journal publishes book reviews, editorials, guest articles, comprehensive literature reviews, and reactions to previously published articles.
期刊最新文献
Changes in Students’ Design-Thinking Mindsets after Design-Based Learning with Respect to Gender and Prior Experiences in Design&nbsp; 33 Years of the <em>JTE</em>: Visioning Forward Embracing Computational Thinking as an Impetus for Artificial Intelligence in Integrated STEM Disciplines through Engineering and Technology Education&nbsp; Miscellany Embedding Safety in Integrative STEM Teaching Methods Courses for Pre-Service Elementary Teachers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1