A Critical Review and Future Directions for Research: Personality and Social Entrepreneurial Success

S. Sahni, Shilpi Sharma, Shashi Aggarwal
{"title":"A Critical Review and Future Directions for Research: Personality and Social Entrepreneurial Success","authors":"S. Sahni, Shilpi Sharma, Shashi Aggarwal","doi":"10.23937/2572-4037.1510036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Probably millions of people across the world dream of starting their own business, a fraction of them may gather the courage and resources to pursue their ambitions, and still, even a smaller fraction of those may persevere through the challenges and inevitable disappointments, entrepreneurial process may present. FInally, a very small number of entrepreneurs succeed in achieving their objectives. What determines the difference in behaviours and attitudes of these individuals? Why some never seek available opportunities, while other dig out hidden potential in coal and convert it to gold? Why would some entrepreneurs give up half way in between; while others would overcome every obstacle, they may find in the way of achieving success. In addition to personality, which remains the largest area of psychological research in social entrepreneurship; recent research has also cited the significance of a personality attribute, matched to the specific tasks, each stage of an entrepreneurship might require, as a significant predictor of performance. In the current paper, we argue that just the trait approach to understanding underpinning personality dimensions to entrepreneurship is not sufficient. An understanding of the dynamic psychological functions and attitudes, as delineated by Jung will facilitate understanding of the strengths and weaknesses a potential entrepreneur may exhibit in any given situation. [4], as over 3.5 million new businesses are initiated each year in the United States; while Fortune 500 was reported to lose over 500 million jobs [5]. Conceptual and empirical predilections have been applied by academics as well as management experts [6] through hundreds of research studies, in an attempt to disentangle the complex, multi-dimensional process of entrepreneurship [7]. This is only a recent development as until 1980s, entrepreneurship was a peripheral perusal of individuals seeking their own source of income [8]; and the term ‘social entrepreneur’ was not coined until the year 1984 [9]. Despite numerous attempts over past two decades, there still exists a degree of scepticism in outlining the rudimentary elements for the concept of social entrepreneurship [10-13]. The number of self-employed enterprises is constantly rising, and they are at the peak of their success, recognition and glory than ever before in the human history. It has been widely acknowledged that only certain individuals with distinctive personality types may initiate and succeed in entrepreneurship initiatives [14]. Being able to predict the likelihood of someone succeeding in an entrepreneurship venture is of high significance to funding agencies as they receive millions of applications every year from potential entrepreneurs. They must ensure that their limited funding goes into the right hands and that they get some returns on their investment. Personality screening is thus of high relevance to the field of entrepreneurship. The key Review ARticle","PeriodicalId":91098,"journal":{"name":"International journal of psychology and psychoanalysis","volume":"2015 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of psychology and psychoanalysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23937/2572-4037.1510036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Probably millions of people across the world dream of starting their own business, a fraction of them may gather the courage and resources to pursue their ambitions, and still, even a smaller fraction of those may persevere through the challenges and inevitable disappointments, entrepreneurial process may present. FInally, a very small number of entrepreneurs succeed in achieving their objectives. What determines the difference in behaviours and attitudes of these individuals? Why some never seek available opportunities, while other dig out hidden potential in coal and convert it to gold? Why would some entrepreneurs give up half way in between; while others would overcome every obstacle, they may find in the way of achieving success. In addition to personality, which remains the largest area of psychological research in social entrepreneurship; recent research has also cited the significance of a personality attribute, matched to the specific tasks, each stage of an entrepreneurship might require, as a significant predictor of performance. In the current paper, we argue that just the trait approach to understanding underpinning personality dimensions to entrepreneurship is not sufficient. An understanding of the dynamic psychological functions and attitudes, as delineated by Jung will facilitate understanding of the strengths and weaknesses a potential entrepreneur may exhibit in any given situation. [4], as over 3.5 million new businesses are initiated each year in the United States; while Fortune 500 was reported to lose over 500 million jobs [5]. Conceptual and empirical predilections have been applied by academics as well as management experts [6] through hundreds of research studies, in an attempt to disentangle the complex, multi-dimensional process of entrepreneurship [7]. This is only a recent development as until 1980s, entrepreneurship was a peripheral perusal of individuals seeking their own source of income [8]; and the term ‘social entrepreneur’ was not coined until the year 1984 [9]. Despite numerous attempts over past two decades, there still exists a degree of scepticism in outlining the rudimentary elements for the concept of social entrepreneurship [10-13]. The number of self-employed enterprises is constantly rising, and they are at the peak of their success, recognition and glory than ever before in the human history. It has been widely acknowledged that only certain individuals with distinctive personality types may initiate and succeed in entrepreneurship initiatives [14]. Being able to predict the likelihood of someone succeeding in an entrepreneurship venture is of high significance to funding agencies as they receive millions of applications every year from potential entrepreneurs. They must ensure that their limited funding goes into the right hands and that they get some returns on their investment. Personality screening is thus of high relevance to the field of entrepreneurship. The key Review ARticle
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人格与社会创业成功:批判性回顾与未来研究方向
世界上可能有数以百万计的人梦想着自己创业,他们中的一小部分人可能会聚集勇气和资源来追求他们的雄心壮志,而且,甚至更小的一部分人可能会在创业过程中遇到挑战和不可避免的失望。最后,极少数企业家成功地实现了他们的目标。是什么决定了这些个体在行为和态度上的差异?为什么有些人从不寻找可利用的机会,而有些人则挖掘煤炭的潜在潜力,将其转化为黄金?为什么有些企业家会半途而废?而其他人会克服每一个障碍,他们可能会发现在取得成功的方式。除了人格,这仍然是社会创业心理学研究的最大领域;最近的研究还指出,与创业的每个阶段可能需要的具体任务相匹配的人格属性的重要性,是对业绩的重要预测。在本文中,我们认为仅仅用特质的方法来理解创业的基本人格维度是不够的。正如荣格所描述的,对动态心理功能和态度的理解将有助于理解潜在企业家在任何特定情况下可能表现出的优势和劣势。[4]因为美国每年有超过350万家新企业成立;而据报道,《财富》500强将失去超过5亿份工作[5]。学者和管理专家[6]已经通过数百项研究应用了概念和经验偏好,试图理清创业的复杂、多维过程[7]。这只是最近的发展,直到20世纪80年代,企业家精神是个人寻求自己的收入来源的外围阅读[8];“社会企业家”这个词直到1984年才被创造出来[9]。尽管在过去二十年中进行了多次尝试,但在概述社会创业概念的基本要素方面仍然存在一定程度的怀疑[10-13]。个体经营企业的数量不断增加,他们正处于人类历史上前所未有的成功、认可和荣耀的顶峰。人们普遍认为,只有某些具有独特人格类型的个体才能发起并成功开展创业活动[14]。能够预测某人在创业中成功的可能性对资助机构来说非常重要,因为他们每年都会收到来自潜在企业家的数百万份申请。他们必须确保他们有限的资金进入正确的人手中,并从他们的投资中获得一些回报。因此,人格筛选与创业领域高度相关。重点综述文章
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
ChatGPT (Generated Pre-Trained Transformer) As an Adjunct to Mental Health Interventions: A Commentary Sexuality in Endometriosis: Preliminary Data on Pain Malevolence and Illness Intrusiveness Psychological Consequences of Female Genital Mutilation - A Review The Relationship between Personality Traits and Effectiveness of Ethiopian Athletes in Long Distance Running The Predictive Effect of Cognitive Flexibility and Probability Knowledge on Probability Category Learning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1