Disparities and Patterns of Pain Management, Pharmacologic Therapies, and Surgical Treatments for Leiomyomas in the 2017–2019 National Survey of Family Growth [ID: 1380252]

C. Rennie, Sanela Andelija, Barbara Prol
{"title":"Disparities and Patterns of Pain Management, Pharmacologic Therapies, and Surgical Treatments for Leiomyomas in the 2017–2019 National Survey of Family Growth [ID: 1380252]","authors":"C. Rennie, Sanela Andelija, Barbara Prol","doi":"10.1097/01.aog.0000929888.98115.b5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION: Leiomyomas affect most women throughout their lifetime with an incidence of roughly 80%. Approximately 30% of these women develop symptomology that warrants intervention. With such a large prevalence, it is important to highlight patterns in treatment modalities to guide effective management for all women with this condition. METHODS: We utilized weighted survey results from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s 2017–2019 National Survey of Family Growth. After isolating data to those who reported a leiomyoma diagnosis, we performed a test of equal proportions (P<.05) among the nine listed therapies compared to the following socioeconomic factors: race, age, education, and insurance status. RESULTS: The incidence of leiomyomas was 7.3% (449/6,141). Hispanic women and those with state-sponsored or uninsured status were more likely to report receiving none of the listed treatments (P=.05 and .02). Women who marked “Other” were most likely to seek alternative medicine (P=.03). Hysterectomy was most likely for Black, White, and 40- to 49-year-old women (P=.02 and P<.001). Nonhysterectomy procedures were most seen with government-sponsored health care, private insurance, and women with graduate degrees (P<.001 and P=.02). Pharmacologically, White women were more likely to receive progesterone-releasing intrauterine devices (P=.02), women 19–29 were more likely to use hormonal medicine (P<.001), and those with government insurance were more likely to receive narcotics (P=.006). CONCLUSION: All socioeconomic factors held significant inconsistencies in the utilization of various leiomyoma treatments. As this condition will affect most women, this analysis highlights the need for future standardization to ensure optimal treatment implementation and patient outcomes.","PeriodicalId":19405,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obstetrics & Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aog.0000929888.98115.b5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Leiomyomas affect most women throughout their lifetime with an incidence of roughly 80%. Approximately 30% of these women develop symptomology that warrants intervention. With such a large prevalence, it is important to highlight patterns in treatment modalities to guide effective management for all women with this condition. METHODS: We utilized weighted survey results from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s 2017–2019 National Survey of Family Growth. After isolating data to those who reported a leiomyoma diagnosis, we performed a test of equal proportions (P<.05) among the nine listed therapies compared to the following socioeconomic factors: race, age, education, and insurance status. RESULTS: The incidence of leiomyomas was 7.3% (449/6,141). Hispanic women and those with state-sponsored or uninsured status were more likely to report receiving none of the listed treatments (P=.05 and .02). Women who marked “Other” were most likely to seek alternative medicine (P=.03). Hysterectomy was most likely for Black, White, and 40- to 49-year-old women (P=.02 and P<.001). Nonhysterectomy procedures were most seen with government-sponsored health care, private insurance, and women with graduate degrees (P<.001 and P=.02). Pharmacologically, White women were more likely to receive progesterone-releasing intrauterine devices (P=.02), women 19–29 were more likely to use hormonal medicine (P<.001), and those with government insurance were more likely to receive narcotics (P=.006). CONCLUSION: All socioeconomic factors held significant inconsistencies in the utilization of various leiomyoma treatments. As this condition will affect most women, this analysis highlights the need for future standardization to ensure optimal treatment implementation and patient outcomes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2017-2019年全国家庭生长调查中平滑肌瘤疼痛管理、药物治疗和手术治疗的差异和模式[j]
简介:平滑肌瘤影响大多数女性一生,发病率约为80%。这些妇女中约有30%出现了需要干预的症状。由于患病率如此之高,强调治疗方式的模式以指导所有患有此病的妇女的有效管理是很重要的。方法:我们利用了美国疾病控制与预防中心2017-2019年全国家庭增长调查的加权调查结果。在对报告平滑肌瘤诊断的患者进行数据隔离后,我们对列出的九种治疗方法与以下社会经济因素(种族、年龄、教育程度和保险状况)进行了同等比例的检验(P< 0.05)。结果:平滑肌瘤的发生率为7.3%(449/ 6141)。西班牙裔妇女和那些有国家资助或没有保险的人更有可能报告没有接受任何列出的治疗(P=。0.05和0.02)。标记为“其他”的女性最有可能寻求替代医学(P=.03)。子宫切除术最有可能发生在黑人、白人和40- 49岁的女性(P=。2和P< 0.001)。非子宫切除手术在政府资助的医疗保健、私人保险和具有研究生学位的妇女中最常见(P< 0.05)。0.001和P=.02)。药理学上,白人女性更倾向于使用释放黄体酮的宫内节育器(P= 0.02), 19-29岁的女性更倾向于使用激素药物(P< 0.001),有政府保险的女性更倾向于使用麻醉品(P= 0.006)。结论:所有社会经济因素在各种平滑肌瘤治疗的使用中具有显著的不一致性。由于这种情况会影响大多数女性,因此该分析强调了未来标准化的必要性,以确保最佳治疗实施和患者预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Author Agreement. A Prospective Study to Assess for Histologic Changes on Vulvar Biopsies in Postmenopausal Women With Lichen Sclerosus Treated With Fractionated CO2 Laser Therapy [ID: 1339895] Prescribing Patterns for Postpartum Contraception Among Breastfeeding Patients Insured Under Medicaid [ID: 1375071] Evaluation of Perioperative Factors Contributing to Organ Space Surgical Site Infection After Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy [ID: 1374862] Delays in Diagnosis and Treatment of Appendicitis in Females [ID: 1375790]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1