Fluid optimisation using a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) following proximal femoral fracture: Lessons learnt from a feasibility study

Elizabeth Tutton B.Sc (Hons), M.Sc, PhD, RN ((Senior Research Fellow)) , Bridget Gray BA (Pall-Care) RGN ((Research Nurse))
{"title":"Fluid optimisation using a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) following proximal femoral fracture: Lessons learnt from a feasibility study","authors":"Elizabeth Tutton B.Sc (Hons), M.Sc, PhD, RN ((Senior Research Fellow)) ,&nbsp;Bridget Gray BA (Pall-Care) RGN ((Research Nurse))","doi":"10.1016/j.joon.2008.10.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The aim of this study was to test the feasibility of using peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) in older people to enable fluid optimisation. Fourteen patients were randomised to three groups: (i) usual care, insertion of short peripheral intravenous cannulae and normal fluid prescription; (ii) PICC insertion and normal fluid prescription; (iii) PICC insertion and guided fluid prescription based on measurements of central venous pressure (CVP). A range of outcome measures were undertaken, plus two focus groups with ward staff and an interview with the research nurse to ascertain views concerning the implementation of the study. Descriptive findings identified that PICC use in this group of patients was extremely difficult. The practical issues affecting the feasibility of this study were: (i) the physical and psychological frailty of the patients, proxy consent, difficulties measuring outcomes, unsuccessful PICC placement due to aged veins, intolerance to lines; (ii) staff concerns relating to patient vulnerability, competent use of new technology, limited resources and work capacity. Most aspects of the trial were made more difficult due to the frailty of the patient group.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100817,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.joon.2008.10.007","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1361311108000824","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The aim of this study was to test the feasibility of using peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) in older people to enable fluid optimisation. Fourteen patients were randomised to three groups: (i) usual care, insertion of short peripheral intravenous cannulae and normal fluid prescription; (ii) PICC insertion and normal fluid prescription; (iii) PICC insertion and guided fluid prescription based on measurements of central venous pressure (CVP). A range of outcome measures were undertaken, plus two focus groups with ward staff and an interview with the research nurse to ascertain views concerning the implementation of the study. Descriptive findings identified that PICC use in this group of patients was extremely difficult. The practical issues affecting the feasibility of this study were: (i) the physical and psychological frailty of the patients, proxy consent, difficulties measuring outcomes, unsuccessful PICC placement due to aged veins, intolerance to lines; (ii) staff concerns relating to patient vulnerability, competent use of new technology, limited resources and work capacity. Most aspects of the trial were made more difficult due to the frailty of the patient group.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
股骨近端骨折后采用外周插入中心导管(PICC)进行液体优化:来自可行性研究的经验教训
本研究的目的是测试在老年人中使用外周插入中心导管(PICCs)以实现液体优化的可行性。14例患者随机分为三组:(i)常规护理,插入短外周静脉插管和正常液体处方;(ii) PICC插入和正常液体处方;(iii)基于中心静脉压(CVP)测量的PICC插入和引导液体处方。进行了一系列的结果测量,加上与病房工作人员的两个焦点小组和与研究护士的访谈,以确定对研究实施的看法。描述性结果表明,在这组患者中使用PICC是非常困难的。影响本研究可行性的实际问题有:(i)患者的生理和心理脆弱,代理同意,难以测量结果,由于静脉老化导致PICC放置失败,对线条不耐受;(ii)工作人员对病人的脆弱性、新技术的有效使用、有限的资源和工作能力的关注。由于患者群体的脆弱,试验的大多数方面都变得更加困难。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Individualised care from the orthopaedic nurses’ point of view: A cross-cultural comparative survey (Concurrent) New oral anticoagulants to revolutionise venous thromboembolism (VTE) management A new low cost method for the assessment of patients with poor back posture and scoliosis: 3D Mapping of 100 Subjects (Poster) Getting evidence into practice – The PARIHS way (Workshop)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1