Detection of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli in meat foods using DNA probes, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and polymerase chain reaction.

M. Alexandre, V. Prado, M. Ulloa, C. Arellano, M. Ríos
{"title":"Detection of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli in meat foods using DNA probes, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and polymerase chain reaction.","authors":"M. Alexandre, V. Prado, M. Ulloa, C. Arellano, M. Ríos","doi":"10.1046/J.1439-0450.2001.00452.X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli (EHEC) is an important cause of diarrhoea with blood and haemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) in children and elderly people. Infections with EHEC are a world-wide public health problem, related to consumption of contaminated ground beef. The aim of this study was to establish whether different meat foods sold in Santiago, Chile pose an infection risk by EHEC and to evaluate three different diagnostic techniques in foods, to determine which is most applicable for use in Chile. A parallel analysis was performed on 64 samples of meat foods (23 refrigerated ground meat, 23 refrigerated long pork sausages and 18 frozen hamburgers) sold in Santiago, Chile using DNA probes, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Twenty-four samples (24 of 64 = 37.5%) were positive by DNA probes, ELISA or PCR. The positive and negative predictive values, sensitivity and specificity of ELISA were 26.7, 81.6, 30.8 and 78.4%, respectively. The positive and negative predictive values, sensitivity and specificity of PCR were 91.7, 96.2, 84.6 and 98%, respectively. The EHEC serogroups most frequently isolated were O158, O157, O119, O125 and O114. These results show that, although molecular techniques such as enzyme immunoassays are useful for EHEC detection in meat foods, PCR has advantages in terms of sensitivity, specificity, cost and ease of implementation in Chile.","PeriodicalId":17659,"journal":{"name":"Journal of veterinary medicine. B, Infectious diseases and veterinary public health","volume":"16 1","pages":"321-30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of veterinary medicine. B, Infectious diseases and veterinary public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1046/J.1439-0450.2001.00452.X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli (EHEC) is an important cause of diarrhoea with blood and haemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) in children and elderly people. Infections with EHEC are a world-wide public health problem, related to consumption of contaminated ground beef. The aim of this study was to establish whether different meat foods sold in Santiago, Chile pose an infection risk by EHEC and to evaluate three different diagnostic techniques in foods, to determine which is most applicable for use in Chile. A parallel analysis was performed on 64 samples of meat foods (23 refrigerated ground meat, 23 refrigerated long pork sausages and 18 frozen hamburgers) sold in Santiago, Chile using DNA probes, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Twenty-four samples (24 of 64 = 37.5%) were positive by DNA probes, ELISA or PCR. The positive and negative predictive values, sensitivity and specificity of ELISA were 26.7, 81.6, 30.8 and 78.4%, respectively. The positive and negative predictive values, sensitivity and specificity of PCR were 91.7, 96.2, 84.6 and 98%, respectively. The EHEC serogroups most frequently isolated were O158, O157, O119, O125 and O114. These results show that, although molecular techniques such as enzyme immunoassays are useful for EHEC detection in meat foods, PCR has advantages in terms of sensitivity, specificity, cost and ease of implementation in Chile.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用DNA探针、酶联免疫吸附试验和聚合酶链反应检测肉类食品中的肠出血性大肠杆菌。
肠出血性大肠杆菌(EHEC)是儿童和老年人伴血性腹泻和溶血性尿毒症综合征(HUS)的一个重要原因。肠出血性大肠杆菌感染是一个世界性的公共卫生问题,与食用受污染的碎牛肉有关。本研究的目的是确定在智利圣地亚哥销售的不同肉类食品是否存在肠出血性大肠杆菌感染的风险,并评估食品中三种不同的诊断技术,以确定哪一种最适用于智利。采用DNA探针、酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)和聚合酶链反应(PCR)对智利圣地亚哥市销售的64种肉类食品(23种冷冻碎肉、23种冷冻长猪肉香肠和18种冷冻汉堡)进行平行分析。24例(24 / 64)经DNA探针、ELISA或PCR检测呈阳性,占37.5%。ELISA阳性预测值为26.7%,阴性预测值为81.6%,敏感性为30.8%,特异性为78.4%。PCR阳性预测值、阴性预测值、敏感性和特异性分别为91.7、96.2、84.6和98%。最常分离出肠出血性大肠杆菌的血清群为O158、O157、O119、O125和O114。这些结果表明,尽管酶免疫测定等分子技术可用于肉类食品中的肠出血性大肠杆菌检测,但在智利,PCR在敏感性、特异性、成本和易于实施方面具有优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Keratoconjunctivitis and periorbital papillomatosis associated with heavy periorbital infestation by the tail louse Haematopinus quadripertusus in heifers. Comparative study of PCR as a direct assay and ELISA and AGID as indirect assays for the detection of bovine leukaemia virus. Histopathological and immunohistochemical study of lambs experimentally infected with Fasciola hepatica and Schistosoma bovis. Use of polymerase chain reaction to identify Brucella abortus strain RB51 among Brucella field isolates from cattle in Italy. Use of monoclonal antibodies in blocking ELISA detection of transmissible gastroenteritis virus in faeces of piglets.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1