Emily M. Boyd, M. Nguyen, Brian Gordon, Richard H. Lee
{"title":"A case of preeclampsia with severe features following septic shock and drug-induced acute kidney injury","authors":"Emily M. Boyd, M. Nguyen, Brian Gordon, Richard H. Lee","doi":"10.1515/crpm-2021-0093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objectives This article outlines a process for differentiating preeclampsia from other potential causes of end-organ damage in a critically ill patient. Case Presentation A patient in her early 30s, G2P1001 with intrauterine pregnancy at 12 weeks’ gestation was admitted seven months after delivering her first child due to new-onset psychosis and starvation ketosis. She was started on lithium for postpartum psychosis at 20 weeks’ gestation. She subsequently developed respiratory failure at 26 weeks’ gestation due to aspiration pneumonia in the setting of lithium toxicity, requiring admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) and intubation. She received antibiotics and vasopressors for suspected septic shock in addition to dialysis for lithium-induced acute kidney injury. One week after ICU admission, her sepsis resolved, her serum creatinine levels returned to normal, and her respiratory status improved. However, after vasopressors were discontinued, she suddenly developed persistently elevated blood pressures with proteinuria and elevated liver function tests (LFT’s). Due to concern for preeclampsia with severe features and rapidly increasing LFT’s, the patient underwent cesarean delivery at 27 weeks’ gestation. Conclusions In a critically ill patient with multiple comorbidities, it can be difficult to diagnose preeclampsia using the standard criteria. It is important to exclude other potential etiologies, as a misdiagnosis can have potentially devastating consequences.","PeriodicalId":9617,"journal":{"name":"Case Reports in Perinatal Medicine","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Case Reports in Perinatal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/crpm-2021-0093","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Abstract Objectives This article outlines a process for differentiating preeclampsia from other potential causes of end-organ damage in a critically ill patient. Case Presentation A patient in her early 30s, G2P1001 with intrauterine pregnancy at 12 weeks’ gestation was admitted seven months after delivering her first child due to new-onset psychosis and starvation ketosis. She was started on lithium for postpartum psychosis at 20 weeks’ gestation. She subsequently developed respiratory failure at 26 weeks’ gestation due to aspiration pneumonia in the setting of lithium toxicity, requiring admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) and intubation. She received antibiotics and vasopressors for suspected septic shock in addition to dialysis for lithium-induced acute kidney injury. One week after ICU admission, her sepsis resolved, her serum creatinine levels returned to normal, and her respiratory status improved. However, after vasopressors were discontinued, she suddenly developed persistently elevated blood pressures with proteinuria and elevated liver function tests (LFT’s). Due to concern for preeclampsia with severe features and rapidly increasing LFT’s, the patient underwent cesarean delivery at 27 weeks’ gestation. Conclusions In a critically ill patient with multiple comorbidities, it can be difficult to diagnose preeclampsia using the standard criteria. It is important to exclude other potential etiologies, as a misdiagnosis can have potentially devastating consequences.
期刊介绍:
Case Reports in Perinatal Medicine is a double-blind peer-reviewed journal. The objective of the new journal is very similar to that of JPM. In addition to evidence-based studies, practitioners in clinical practice esteem especially exemplary reports of cases that reveal specific manifestations of diseases, its progress or its treatment. We consider case reports and series to be brief reports describing an isolated clinical case or a small number of cases. They may describe new or uncommon diagnoses, unusual outcomes or prognosis, new or infrequently used therapies and side effects of therapy not usually discovered in clinical trials. They represent the basic concept of experiences for studies on representative groups for further evidence-based research. The potential roles of case reports and case series are: Recognition and description of new diseases Detection of drug side effects (adverse or beneficial) Study of mechanisms of disease Medical education and audit Recognition of rare manifestations of disease.