B. Schmidt, S. Bordignon, S. Tohoku, Shaojie Chen, F. Bologna, L. Urbanek, F. Pansera, Matthias Ernst, K. J. Chun
{"title":"5S Study: Safe and Simple Single Shot Pulmonary Vein Isolation With Pulsed Field Ablation Using Sedation","authors":"B. Schmidt, S. Bordignon, S. Tohoku, Shaojie Chen, F. Bologna, L. Urbanek, F. Pansera, Matthias Ernst, K. J. Chun","doi":"10.1161/CIRCEP.121.010817","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Pulsed field ablation represents an energy source specific for ablation of cardiac arrhythmias including atrial fibrillation. The aim of the study was to describe the adoption and the process of streamlining procedures with a new ablation technology. Methods: All-comer atrial fibrillation patients (n=191; mean age 69±12 years) underwent catheter ablation with a pulsed field ablation ablation device exclusively using analog-sedation. In the validation phase (n=25), device electrogram quality was compared with a circular mapping catheter to assess pulmonary vein isolation and esophageal temperature monitoring was used. In the streamline phase (n=166), a single-catheter approach was implemented. Postprocedural cerebral magnetic resonance imaging was performed in 53 patients. In 52 patients, esophageal endoscopy was performed at day 1 after the procedure. Follow-up was performed using 72 hours Holter ECGs. Results: On a pulmonary vein basis, pulmonary vein isolation rate was 100% including a single shot isolation rate of 99.5%. The electrogram information of the pulsed field ablation catheter and the circular mapping catheter were 100% congruent. Neither esophageal temperature rises nor esophageal thermal injury were observed. Two minor strokes occurred, presumable due to air embolism during catheter exchanges through the large bore sheath (13.8 F ID). In the streamline phase, reduced procedure times (46±14 versus 38±13 minutes, P=0.004), no further strokes and a low incidence of silent cerebral injury (10/53 patients; 19%) were noted. During short-term follow-up, 17/191 patients (9%) had a atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence. Conclusions: The pulsed field ablation device allows for simple and safe simple single shot pulmonary vein isolation using standard sedation protocols. Procedural speed and efficacy are remarkable and streamlining measures have added safety.","PeriodicalId":10167,"journal":{"name":"Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology","volume":"12 1","pages":"e010817"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"30","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.121.010817","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 30
Abstract
Background: Pulsed field ablation represents an energy source specific for ablation of cardiac arrhythmias including atrial fibrillation. The aim of the study was to describe the adoption and the process of streamlining procedures with a new ablation technology. Methods: All-comer atrial fibrillation patients (n=191; mean age 69±12 years) underwent catheter ablation with a pulsed field ablation ablation device exclusively using analog-sedation. In the validation phase (n=25), device electrogram quality was compared with a circular mapping catheter to assess pulmonary vein isolation and esophageal temperature monitoring was used. In the streamline phase (n=166), a single-catheter approach was implemented. Postprocedural cerebral magnetic resonance imaging was performed in 53 patients. In 52 patients, esophageal endoscopy was performed at day 1 after the procedure. Follow-up was performed using 72 hours Holter ECGs. Results: On a pulmonary vein basis, pulmonary vein isolation rate was 100% including a single shot isolation rate of 99.5%. The electrogram information of the pulsed field ablation catheter and the circular mapping catheter were 100% congruent. Neither esophageal temperature rises nor esophageal thermal injury were observed. Two minor strokes occurred, presumable due to air embolism during catheter exchanges through the large bore sheath (13.8 F ID). In the streamline phase, reduced procedure times (46±14 versus 38±13 minutes, P=0.004), no further strokes and a low incidence of silent cerebral injury (10/53 patients; 19%) were noted. During short-term follow-up, 17/191 patients (9%) had a atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence. Conclusions: The pulsed field ablation device allows for simple and safe simple single shot pulmonary vein isolation using standard sedation protocols. Procedural speed and efficacy are remarkable and streamlining measures have added safety.
背景:脉冲场消融是包括心房颤动在内的心律失常消融的一种特殊能量来源。本研究的目的是描述一种新的消融技术的采用和简化程序的过程。方法:全角性心房颤动患者191例;平均年龄69±12岁)采用脉冲场消融术进行导管消融术。在验证阶段(n=25),将设备电图质量与圆形测图导管进行比较,以评估肺静脉隔离,并使用食管温度监测。流线期(n=166)采用单导管入路。对53例患者行术后脑磁共振成像。52例患者在术后第1天进行食管内镜检查。随访采用72小时动态心电图。结果:以肺静脉为基础,肺静脉分离率100%,其中单针分离率99.5%。脉冲场消融导管与圆形测图导管的电图信息100%一致。未见食管温度升高,也未见食管热损伤。发生了两例轻微中风,可能是由于在通过大口径护套交换导管时发生空气栓塞(13.8 F ID)。在流线期,手术时间缩短(46±14分钟vs 38±13分钟,P=0.004),无进一步卒中,无症状脑损伤发生率低(10/53例;19%)。在短期随访中,191例患者中有17例(9%)再次发生房性心动过速。结论:脉冲场消融术装置允许使用标准镇静方案进行简单、安全的单次肺静脉隔离。程序速度和效率显著,精简措施增加了安全性。