CROATIAN AND GERMAN ACCOUNTING – A GUIDING OVERVIEW OF REGULATIONS AGAINST THE BACKGROUND OF THE ACCOUNTING DIRECTIVE 2013/34/EU

Q3 Social Sciences InterEULawEast Pub Date : 2019-12-01 DOI:10.22598/iele.2019.6.2.6
I. Sačer, Gunther Meeh-Bunse, Katja Luer
{"title":"CROATIAN AND GERMAN ACCOUNTING – A GUIDING OVERVIEW OF REGULATIONS AGAINST THE BACKGROUND OF THE ACCOUNTING DIRECTIVE 2013/34/EU","authors":"I. Sačer, Gunther Meeh-Bunse, Katja Luer","doi":"10.22598/iele.2019.6.2.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Accounting Directive 2013/34/EU has impacted all the EU Member States due to their obligation to transpose it into the national legal acts. The paper deals with the Croatian and German regulations against the Accounting Directive. Since the Directive offers several alternatives for which national regulators should decide what to include in the legal framework, there are certain differences among the EU Member states. The goal of the paper is to analyze the case of Croatian and German accounting in the light of regulations and standards. The selected countries are important strategic and trading partners and the number of subsidiaries in Croatia formed by German entities increases. The methodology includes the analysis of accounting legal framework in the observed countries in the light of the Accounting Directive implementation, the role of Companies act and the financial reporting standards in prescribing accounting principles and the interrelation between financial and tax accounting. Although both countries have implemented the Directive, our research results indicate that there is a difference between the accounting systems. German accounting principles are defined through the German Companies Act whereas the Croatian Accounting Act represents the top act in charge of accounting in Croatia supplemented with the CFRS and IFRS. As a consequence, the difference is also found in the interdependence between financial and tax accounting. However, there * Full professor at Faculty of Economics and Business University of Zagreb; imamic@efzg.hr. ** Full professor, Hochschule Osnabrück, Lingen Campus; G.Meeh-Bunse@hs-osnabrueck.de. *** Research Assistant, Hochschule Osnabrück, Lingen Campus; K.Luer@hs-osnabrueck.de. Intereulaweast, Vol. VI (2) 2019 116 are some similarities indicated, as the commercial balance sheet should be adjusted for the purpose of taxation in both countries.","PeriodicalId":52280,"journal":{"name":"InterEULawEast","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"InterEULawEast","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22598/iele.2019.6.2.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The Accounting Directive 2013/34/EU has impacted all the EU Member States due to their obligation to transpose it into the national legal acts. The paper deals with the Croatian and German regulations against the Accounting Directive. Since the Directive offers several alternatives for which national regulators should decide what to include in the legal framework, there are certain differences among the EU Member states. The goal of the paper is to analyze the case of Croatian and German accounting in the light of regulations and standards. The selected countries are important strategic and trading partners and the number of subsidiaries in Croatia formed by German entities increases. The methodology includes the analysis of accounting legal framework in the observed countries in the light of the Accounting Directive implementation, the role of Companies act and the financial reporting standards in prescribing accounting principles and the interrelation between financial and tax accounting. Although both countries have implemented the Directive, our research results indicate that there is a difference between the accounting systems. German accounting principles are defined through the German Companies Act whereas the Croatian Accounting Act represents the top act in charge of accounting in Croatia supplemented with the CFRS and IFRS. As a consequence, the difference is also found in the interdependence between financial and tax accounting. However, there * Full professor at Faculty of Economics and Business University of Zagreb; imamic@efzg.hr. ** Full professor, Hochschule Osnabrück, Lingen Campus; G.Meeh-Bunse@hs-osnabrueck.de. *** Research Assistant, Hochschule Osnabrück, Lingen Campus; K.Luer@hs-osnabrueck.de. Intereulaweast, Vol. VI (2) 2019 116 are some similarities indicated, as the commercial balance sheet should be adjusted for the purpose of taxation in both countries.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
克罗地亚和德国会计-在会计指令2013/34/ eu背景下的法规指导概述
会计指令2013/34/EU影响了所有欧盟成员国,因为它们有义务将其转化为国家法律行为。本文讨论了克罗地亚和德国对会计指令的规定。由于该指令提供了几种可供各国监管机构决定将哪些内容纳入法律框架的替代方案,因此欧盟成员国之间存在一定的差异。本文的目的是分析克罗地亚和德国会计在法规和标准方面的情况。所选国家是重要的战略和贸易伙伴,德国实体在克罗地亚设立的附属公司数目也有所增加。该方法包括根据会计指令实施,公司法和财务报告标准在规定会计原则中的作用以及财务会计和税务会计之间的相互关系,对所观察国家的会计法律框架进行分析。虽然两国都实施了该指令,但我们的研究结果表明,会计制度之间存在差异。德国的会计原则是通过《德国公司法》确定的,而克罗地亚的《会计法》代表了克罗地亚负责会计的最高法案,并补充了CFRS和IFRS。因此,财务会计和税务会计之间的相互依赖也存在差异。然而,萨格勒布大学经济与商业学院正教授;imamic@efzg.hr。**奥斯纳布尔大学林根校区正教授;G.Meeh-Bunse@hs-osnabrueck.de。***奥斯纳布尔大学林根校区研究助理;K.Luer@hs-osnabrueck.de。Intereulaweast, Vol. VI(2) 2019 116指出了一些相似之处,因为商业资产负债表应根据两国的税收目的进行调整。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
InterEULawEast
InterEULawEast Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊最新文献
DYNAMIC INDUSTRIES REQUIRE A DYNAMIC APPROACH TO LAW? ON THE ILLUMINAGRAIL TAKEOVER THE DIGITAL ECONOMY AND LEGAL CHALLENGES DIGITAL RIGHTS IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS SYSTEM REMITTANCES ARE THE MAIN INDICATORS OF ECONOMIC GROWTH IN THE WESTERN BALKANS THE IMPACT OF THE ASSOCIATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE EUROPEAN UNION AND UKRAINE ON MUTUAL TRADE AND UKRAINIAN PORTS CARGO
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1