Difficulties in Understanding Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction

Anqi Ni, Wei-hua Yu
{"title":"Difficulties in Understanding Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction","authors":"Anqi Ni, Wei-hua Yu","doi":"10.24015/JAPM.2017.0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim of review: Firstly brought up by Bedford in 1955, postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) has been given increasing attention due to the increase of the elderly population. Although many researches have been conducted on POCD, the understanding of this clinical syndrome is still limited. There are currently many disputes regarding almost every aspects of POCD, even the term itself has not been included in the MeSH Database. This review aims to discuss the major disputes about POCD that hinder research consistency and provide possible perspectives for future research.Method: Recent articles and literatures about POCD were searched and reviewed. First, basic knowledge of POCD, including characteristics and incidence, risk factors, mechanisms, prevention and intervention are introduced. Second, the major obstacles of investigating POCD are discussed. Then two major problems are proposed: 1) Does the POCD in patients really start postoperatively? 2) Is POCD only related to old age? Finally, the never-ending argument regarding the role of anesthesia on POCD is discussed.Recent findings: Recent researches regarding POCD focused on the surgery-related neuroinflammation mechanism, and efforts have been made to find some biomarkers of POCD. In terms of POCD, there are many fundamental concepts and in urgent need of consensus. First, unifying the terms used among studies will benefit the communication of knowledge. Second, questions like whether POCD should be defined as a general cognitive decline that include other forms such as postoperative delirium, or they should be considered as separate unique illnesses, and whether or not young patients should be included when POCD is discussed, need to be answered. Only after answering these questions, will the study of POCD be less disputable. Third but not the least, efforts should be made trying to make \"golden-standard\" in regard of the testing methods of POCD both clinically and pre-clinically.Summary: Although lots of researches have been conducted on POCD, the understanding of this clinical syndrome is still very limited. There are currently many disputes regarding almost every aspect of POCD. It's time for clinicians and scholars to strike some fundamental consensus for the better investigation of POCD. How to find a way to increase the rigor of experimental design is an important question that still seeks answers. Citation:  Ni An, Wei-Feng Yu. Difficulties in understanding postoperative cognitive dysfunction. J Anesth Perioper Med 2017; 4: 87-94. doi: 10.24015/JAPM.2017.0010This is an open-access article, published by Evidence Based Communications (EBC). This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format for any lawful purpose. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.","PeriodicalId":15018,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine","volume":"19 1","pages":"87-94"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24015/JAPM.2017.0010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Aim of review: Firstly brought up by Bedford in 1955, postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) has been given increasing attention due to the increase of the elderly population. Although many researches have been conducted on POCD, the understanding of this clinical syndrome is still limited. There are currently many disputes regarding almost every aspects of POCD, even the term itself has not been included in the MeSH Database. This review aims to discuss the major disputes about POCD that hinder research consistency and provide possible perspectives for future research.Method: Recent articles and literatures about POCD were searched and reviewed. First, basic knowledge of POCD, including characteristics and incidence, risk factors, mechanisms, prevention and intervention are introduced. Second, the major obstacles of investigating POCD are discussed. Then two major problems are proposed: 1) Does the POCD in patients really start postoperatively? 2) Is POCD only related to old age? Finally, the never-ending argument regarding the role of anesthesia on POCD is discussed.Recent findings: Recent researches regarding POCD focused on the surgery-related neuroinflammation mechanism, and efforts have been made to find some biomarkers of POCD. In terms of POCD, there are many fundamental concepts and in urgent need of consensus. First, unifying the terms used among studies will benefit the communication of knowledge. Second, questions like whether POCD should be defined as a general cognitive decline that include other forms such as postoperative delirium, or they should be considered as separate unique illnesses, and whether or not young patients should be included when POCD is discussed, need to be answered. Only after answering these questions, will the study of POCD be less disputable. Third but not the least, efforts should be made trying to make "golden-standard" in regard of the testing methods of POCD both clinically and pre-clinically.Summary: Although lots of researches have been conducted on POCD, the understanding of this clinical syndrome is still very limited. There are currently many disputes regarding almost every aspect of POCD. It's time for clinicians and scholars to strike some fundamental consensus for the better investigation of POCD. How to find a way to increase the rigor of experimental design is an important question that still seeks answers. Citation:  Ni An, Wei-Feng Yu. Difficulties in understanding postoperative cognitive dysfunction. J Anesth Perioper Med 2017; 4: 87-94. doi: 10.24015/JAPM.2017.0010This is an open-access article, published by Evidence Based Communications (EBC). This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format for any lawful purpose. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
理解术后认知功能障碍的困难
摘要:术后认知功能障碍(POCD)最早由Bedford于1955年提出,随着老年人口的增加,该问题越来越受到人们的重视。虽然对POCD进行了很多研究,但对这一临床综合征的认识仍然有限。目前,关于POCD的几乎所有方面都存在许多争议,甚至该术语本身也没有被纳入MeSH数据库。本文旨在探讨影响POCD研究一致性的主要争议,并为未来的研究提供可能的视角。首先,介绍了POCD的基本知识,包括POCD的特点、发病率、危险因素、发病机制、预防和干预措施。其次,讨论了研究POCD的主要障碍。然后提出了两个主要问题:1)患者的POCD真的是从术后开始的吗?2) POCD只与老年有关吗?最后,讨论了关于麻醉在POCD中的作用的无休止的争论。近期发现:近期关于POCD的研究主要集中在与手术相关的神经炎症机制上,并努力寻找POCD的一些生物标志物。在POCD方面,有许多基本概念,迫切需要达成共识。首先,统一研究中使用的术语将有利于知识的交流。其次,POCD是否应该被定义为包括术后谵妄等其他形式的一般认知能力下降,或者它们应该被视为单独的独特疾病,以及在讨论POCD时是否应该包括年轻患者等问题需要回答。只有回答了这些问题,POCD的研究才会少一些争议。第三,努力建立POCD临床和临床前检测方法的“金标准”。摘要:虽然对POCD进行了大量的研究,但对这一临床综合征的认识仍然非常有限。目前,关于POCD的各个方面都存在许多争议。现在是临床医生和学者为更好地研究POCD达成一些基本共识的时候了。如何找到一种方法来增加实验设计的严谨性是一个仍在寻求答案的重要问题。引用本文:倪安,余卫峰。难以理解术后认知功能障碍。中华外科杂志2017;4: 87 - 94。doi: 10.24015/ japm .2017.0010这是一篇开放获取的文章,由Evidence Based Communications (EBC)发表。本作品遵循知识共享署名4.0国际许可协议,允许以任何媒介或格式出于任何合法目的不受限制地使用、分发和复制。要查看此许可证的副本,请访问http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reopen JAPM: Make a difference Altered Expression of 5-HT Receptor Subtypes in the Spinal Cord After Cardiac Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury Anesthesia for Percutaneous Fetal Pulmonary Valvuloplasty: A Single Center Experience in Five Cases Epinephrine on Continuous Epidural Pain Relief in Labor Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Parturients Undergoing Intrapartum Cesarean Delivery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1