Comparison of efficacy between 27G and 25G vitrectomy for proliferative diabetic retinopathy

Yan Gao, Li-li Yuan, Dong-chang Zhang, Dongping Li
{"title":"Comparison of efficacy between 27G and 25G vitrectomy for proliferative diabetic retinopathy","authors":"Yan Gao, Li-li Yuan, Dong-chang Zhang, Dongping Li","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.2095-1477.2019.10.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo compare the efficacy between 27G and 25G vitrectomy for the treatment of proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). \n \n \nMethods \nThe data of 185 eyes of 185 cases of PDR who received vitrectomy in this hospital from Jan. 2017 to Dec. 2017 were analyzed retrospectively. All cases were divided into two groups. There were 64 eyes in the 27G vitrectomy group and 121 eyes in the 25G vitrectomy group. \n \n \nResults \nThere was no significant difference in the preoperative baseline data between the two groups (P>0.05). The difference of postoperative score of symptoms, operation time, intraocular pressure, reoperation rate because of retinal detachment and vitreous hemorrhage were all not statistically significant between the two groups(P=0.070, 0.367, 0.503, 0.667). \n \n \nConclusion \n27G and 25G are equally safe and effective in the treatment of diabetic retinopathy. \n \n \nKey words: \nRetinopathy, diabetic, proliferative; Vitrectomy, 25G, 27G; Visual acuity","PeriodicalId":10126,"journal":{"name":"中华眼外伤职业眼病杂志","volume":"22 1","pages":"740-743"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华眼外伤职业眼病杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.2095-1477.2019.10.005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective To compare the efficacy between 27G and 25G vitrectomy for the treatment of proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). Methods The data of 185 eyes of 185 cases of PDR who received vitrectomy in this hospital from Jan. 2017 to Dec. 2017 were analyzed retrospectively. All cases were divided into two groups. There were 64 eyes in the 27G vitrectomy group and 121 eyes in the 25G vitrectomy group. Results There was no significant difference in the preoperative baseline data between the two groups (P>0.05). The difference of postoperative score of symptoms, operation time, intraocular pressure, reoperation rate because of retinal detachment and vitreous hemorrhage were all not statistically significant between the two groups(P=0.070, 0.367, 0.503, 0.667). Conclusion 27G and 25G are equally safe and effective in the treatment of diabetic retinopathy. Key words: Retinopathy, diabetic, proliferative; Vitrectomy, 25G, 27G; Visual acuity
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
27G与25G玻璃体切除术治疗增殖性糖尿病视网膜病变的疗效比较
目的比较27G玻璃体切除术与25G玻璃体切除术治疗增殖性糖尿病视网膜病变(PDR)的疗效。方法回顾性分析我院2017年1月至2017年12月行玻璃体切除术的185例PDR患者185只眼的资料。所有病例分为两组。27G玻璃体切除术组64眼,25G玻璃体切除术组121眼。结果两组术前基线资料比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组患者术后症状评分、手术时间、眼压、视网膜脱离、玻璃体出血再手术率差异均无统计学意义(P=0.070、0.367、0.503、0.667)。结论27G与25G治疗糖尿病视网膜病变安全有效。关键词:视网膜病变,糖尿病,增生性;玻璃体切除术,25G, 27G;视敏度
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8728
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
Orbital Foreign Bodies Severe Ocular Chemical Injury Traumatic Aniridia Ocular Laser Burns Intraocular Hemorrhage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1