Infections néonatales à Enterococcus fæcalis : analyse de 29 observations

M.S Lahbabi , M Wafi , M Benbachir , S Benomar , C Nejjari
{"title":"Infections néonatales à Enterococcus fæcalis : analyse de 29 observations","authors":"M.S Lahbabi ,&nbsp;M Wafi ,&nbsp;M Benbachir ,&nbsp;S Benomar ,&nbsp;C Nejjari","doi":"10.1016/S1164-6756(00)90002-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><strong>Objective:</strong> Resistance of <em>Enterococcus fæcalis</em> to antibiotics has considerably increased and led to therapeutic difficulties. The purpose of our study is to specify the factors of risk of the <em>Enterococcus fæcalis</em> infection in a neonatal intensive care unit and to determine the sensitivity of isolate strains.</p><p><strong>Methods:</strong> We retrospectively analyzed 29 cases, collected during 1996 and 1997. Two groups were compared according to <em>χ</em><sup>2</sup> test: group 1 (acquisition of <em>Enterococcus fæcalis</em> infection), group 2 (asymptomatic bacteremia). The determination of isolate strains was based on the method of disks.</p><p><strong>Results:</strong> The dominant clinical picture was severe in 38% (<span><math><mtext>11</mtext><mtext>29</mtext></math></span>) of the cases. In 31% (<span><math><mtext>9</mtext><mtext>29</mtext></math></span>) of cases, neurologic symptomes were predominant, and in 28% (<span><math><mtext>8</mtext><mtext>29</mtext></math></span>) a respiratory distress was observed. The risk factors for acquiring an <em>Enterococcus fæcalis</em> infection were the administration of large spectrum antibiotics in <span><math><mtext>14</mtext><mtext>15</mtext></math></span> (93%) for group 1 vs <span><math><mtext>6</mtext><mtext>14</mtext></math></span> (43%) for group 2, and the frequent use of buccopharyngeal aspirations: <span><math><mtext>6</mtext><mtext>15</mtext></math></span> (40%) for group 1 vs <span><math><mtext>1</mtext><mtext>14</mtext></math></span> (7%) for group 2. <em>Enterococcus fæcalis</em> were resistant to penicillin G in 50%, to amoxicillin in 34%, and exhibited a high level of resistance to gentamicin in 87%; no case of resistance to vancomycin was observed. Mortality rate was 20% (<span><math><mtext>3</mtext><mtext>15</mtext></math></span>) in group 1 and 7% (<span><math><mtext>1</mtext><mtext>14</mtext></math></span>) in group 2.</p><p><strong>Conclusion:</strong> <em>Enterococcus fæcalis</em> is a frequent cause of septicemia in critically ill newborns. The prevention of nosocomial infection by using the hygiene measures and a rational prescription of the antibiotics is underlined.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101063,"journal":{"name":"Réanimation Urgences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1164-6756(00)90002-1","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Réanimation Urgences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1164675600900021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objective: Resistance of Enterococcus fæcalis to antibiotics has considerably increased and led to therapeutic difficulties. The purpose of our study is to specify the factors of risk of the Enterococcus fæcalis infection in a neonatal intensive care unit and to determine the sensitivity of isolate strains.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 29 cases, collected during 1996 and 1997. Two groups were compared according to χ2 test: group 1 (acquisition of Enterococcus fæcalis infection), group 2 (asymptomatic bacteremia). The determination of isolate strains was based on the method of disks.

Results: The dominant clinical picture was severe in 38% (1129) of the cases. In 31% (929) of cases, neurologic symptomes were predominant, and in 28% (829) a respiratory distress was observed. The risk factors for acquiring an Enterococcus fæcalis infection were the administration of large spectrum antibiotics in 1415 (93%) for group 1 vs 614 (43%) for group 2, and the frequent use of buccopharyngeal aspirations: 615 (40%) for group 1 vs 114 (7%) for group 2. Enterococcus fæcalis were resistant to penicillin G in 50%, to amoxicillin in 34%, and exhibited a high level of resistance to gentamicin in 87%; no case of resistance to vancomycin was observed. Mortality rate was 20% (315) in group 1 and 7% (114) in group 2.

Conclusion: Enterococcus fæcalis is a frequent cause of septicemia in critically ill newborns. The prevention of nosocomial infection by using the hygiene measures and a rational prescription of the antibiotics is underlined.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新生儿fæcalis肠球菌感染:29项观察结果的分析
目的:粪肠球菌对抗生素的耐药性明显增加,导致治疗困难。本研究的目的是明确新生儿重症监护病房中f型肠球菌感染的危险因素,并确定分离菌株的敏感性。方法对1996 ~ 1997年收治的29例病例进行回顾性分析。两组比较采用χ2检验:1组(获得f型肠球菌感染),2组(无症状菌血症)。分离菌株的测定采用纸片法。结果:1129例患者中有38%的临床表现以重症为主。31%(929)的病例以神经系统症状为主,28%(829)的病例出现呼吸窘迫。获得f型肠球菌感染的危险因素是1组1415例(93%)对2组614例(43%)使用大谱抗生素,以及1组615例(40%)对2组114例(7%)频繁使用咽咽吸痰。对青霉素G耐药的占50%,对阿莫西林耐药的占34%,对庆大霉素高耐药的占87%;未见万古霉素耐药病例。1组死亡率为20%(315),2组死亡率为7%(114)。结论:粪肠球菌是危重新生儿败血症的常见病因。强调应采取卫生措施,合理使用抗菌药物,预防院内感染。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Nutrition artificielle en réanimation ECMO Corticothérapie au cours du choc septique et du syndrome de détresse respiratoire aiguë Rôle des glucocorticoïdes dans la cascade inflammatoire Corticoïdes chez l'enfant dans le purpura fulminans et la dysplasie bronchopulmonaire
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1