Biopsia renal seriada en nefropatía lúpica: ¿es necesaria?

Nasser Abdel Polanco Flores , María Virgilia Soto Abraham , Francisco Eugenio Rodríguez Castellanos
{"title":"Biopsia renal seriada en nefropatía lúpica: ¿es necesaria?","authors":"Nasser Abdel Polanco Flores ,&nbsp;María Virgilia Soto Abraham ,&nbsp;Francisco Eugenio Rodríguez Castellanos","doi":"10.1016/j.dialis.2013.08.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction and objectives</h3><p>Lupus nephritis continues to be the most common cause of renal failure of autoimmune origin that requires dialysis in our region. There is limited information available on the role of serial biopsies in lupus nephritis. Our objective was to compare the renal function of patients with lupus nephritis with a repeated renal biopsy at one year, with patients without a repeated biopsy.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A longitudinal, retrospective, observational and comparative analysis study was conducted on patients with lupus nephritis with at least one renal biopsy between January 2004 and January 2012.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 100 patients included with lupus nephritis, 57 of them had a repeated biopsy, and 43 had no repeated biopsy. The group without a repeated biopsy had a higher percentage of patients with declining renal function (58.1% vs. 41.9%) and a higher percentage of patients on dialysis after a one year follow up, in comparison to the group with repeated biopsies (90% vs. 10%, <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.002). Eighty percent of the patients with a repeated biopsy had a modification in their immunosuppressive treatment as a result of the serial biopsy. In this group, 57.9% of the patients received a more aggressive immunosuppressive treatment or a new treatment strategy.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Repeated renal biopsies in lupus nephritis allow an early modification of the immunosuppressive strategy, prevent progressive decline in renal function, and limit the use of dialysis in this group of patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100373,"journal":{"name":"Diálisis y Trasplante","volume":"35 3","pages":"Pages 90-97"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.dialis.2013.08.004","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diálisis y Trasplante","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S188628451300115X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction and objectives

Lupus nephritis continues to be the most common cause of renal failure of autoimmune origin that requires dialysis in our region. There is limited information available on the role of serial biopsies in lupus nephritis. Our objective was to compare the renal function of patients with lupus nephritis with a repeated renal biopsy at one year, with patients without a repeated biopsy.

Methods

A longitudinal, retrospective, observational and comparative analysis study was conducted on patients with lupus nephritis with at least one renal biopsy between January 2004 and January 2012.

Results

Of the 100 patients included with lupus nephritis, 57 of them had a repeated biopsy, and 43 had no repeated biopsy. The group without a repeated biopsy had a higher percentage of patients with declining renal function (58.1% vs. 41.9%) and a higher percentage of patients on dialysis after a one year follow up, in comparison to the group with repeated biopsies (90% vs. 10%, P = .002). Eighty percent of the patients with a repeated biopsy had a modification in their immunosuppressive treatment as a result of the serial biopsy. In this group, 57.9% of the patients received a more aggressive immunosuppressive treatment or a new treatment strategy.

Conclusions

Repeated renal biopsies in lupus nephritis allow an early modification of the immunosuppressive strategy, prevent progressive decline in renal function, and limit the use of dialysis in this group of patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
狼疮肾病的连续肾活检:有必要吗?
简介和目的狼疮肾炎仍然是最常见的自身免疫性肾衰竭的原因,需要透析在我们的地区。有有限的信息,可用于在狼疮性肾炎系列活检的作用。我们的目的是比较狼疮性肾炎患者在一年内反复进行肾活检和未进行反复活检的患者的肾功能。方法对2004年1月至2012年1月间至少进行一次肾活检的狼疮性肾炎患者进行纵向、回顾性、观察和比较分析。结果100例狼疮性肾炎患者中,57例重复活检,43例未重复活检。与重复活检组相比,未重复活检组有更高比例的患者肾功能下降(58.1%对41.9%),并且在一年随访后透析患者的比例更高(90%对10%,P = 0.002)。80%重复活检的患者由于连续活检而改变了他们的免疫抑制治疗。在该组中,57.9%的患者接受了更积极的免疫抑制治疗或新的治疗策略。结论:在狼疮性肾炎患者中,反复肾活检可以早期修改免疫抑制策略,防止肾功能进行性下降,并限制透析的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Condiciones de vivienda y el desarrollo de la primera peritonitis en pacientes que iniciaron diálisis peritoneal en el periodo 2002-2011 en un hospital de Lima Deficiencia funcional de hierro en pacientes de hemodiálisis. Utilidad de la hemoglobina reticulocitaria y recuento de reticulocitos inmaduros Infección de catéteres venosos centrales para hemodiálisis Estudio prospectivo controlado aleatorizado sobre el uso precoz de espironolactona o losartán en la regresión de la HVI postrasplante renal [XXXVII SEDYT 2015] Implantación de la pauta de hemodiálisis incremental (2 sesiones a la semana) en pacientes que inician tratamiento renal sustitutivo. Experiencia de un centro
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1