How We Express Ourselves Freely: Censorship, Self-censorship, and Anti-censorship on a Chinese Social Media

Xiangxi Chen, Jiamu Xie, Zixin Wang, Bohui Shen, Zhixuan Zhou
{"title":"How We Express Ourselves Freely: Censorship, Self-censorship, and Anti-censorship on a Chinese Social Media","authors":"Xiangxi Chen, Jiamu Xie, Zixin Wang, Bohui Shen, Zhixuan Zhou","doi":"10.48550/arXiv.2211.13748","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Censorship, anti-censorship, and self-censorship in an authoritarian regime have been extensively studies, yet the relationship between these intertwined factors is not well understood. In this paper, we report results of a large-scale survey study (N = 526) with Sina Weibo users toward bridging this research gap. Through descriptive statistics, correlation analysis, and regression analysis, we uncover how users are being censored, how and why they conduct self-censorship on different topics and in different scenarios (i.e., post, repost, and comment), and their various anti-censorship strategies. We further identify the metrics of censorship and self-censorship, find the influence factors, and construct a mediation model to measure their relationship. Based on these findings, we discuss implications for democratic social media design and future censorship research.","PeriodicalId":93543,"journal":{"name":"Diversity, divergence, dialogue : 16th international conference, iConference 2021, Beijing, China, March 17-31, 2021 : proceedings. iConference (Conference) (16th : 2021 : Online)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diversity, divergence, dialogue : 16th international conference, iConference 2021, Beijing, China, March 17-31, 2021 : proceedings. iConference (Conference) (16th : 2021 : Online)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2211.13748","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Censorship, anti-censorship, and self-censorship in an authoritarian regime have been extensively studies, yet the relationship between these intertwined factors is not well understood. In this paper, we report results of a large-scale survey study (N = 526) with Sina Weibo users toward bridging this research gap. Through descriptive statistics, correlation analysis, and regression analysis, we uncover how users are being censored, how and why they conduct self-censorship on different topics and in different scenarios (i.e., post, repost, and comment), and their various anti-censorship strategies. We further identify the metrics of censorship and self-censorship, find the influence factors, and construct a mediation model to measure their relationship. Based on these findings, we discuss implications for democratic social media design and future censorship research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
我们如何自由表达自己:中国社交媒体上的审查、自我审查和反审查
专制政权中的审查、反审查和自我审查已被广泛研究,但这些相互交织的因素之间的关系尚未得到很好的理解。在本文中,我们报告了一项针对新浪微博用户的大规模调查研究(N = 526)的结果,以弥合这一研究差距。通过描述性统计、相关分析和回归分析,我们揭示了用户是如何被审查的,他们如何以及为什么在不同的主题和不同的场景下(即,发布、转发和评论)进行自我审查,以及他们的各种反审查策略。我们进一步确定审查和自我审查的度量标准,找出影响因素,并构建中介模型来衡量它们之间的关系。基于这些发现,我们讨论了民主社交媒体设计和未来审查研究的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An Analysis of Classification Approaches for Hit Song Prediction using Engineered Metadata Features with Lyrics and Audio Features Towards a Useful Chinese Annotation Tool: An Examination of Annotators' Practice and Needs How Much Context Do Users Provide in App Reviews? Implications for Requirements Elicitation Text Mining and Visualization of Political Party Programs Using Keyword Extraction Methods: The Case of Portuguese Legislative Elections Investigating Factors Influencing Open Government from a Country's Perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1