A comparison of various 3-D approaches for the analysis of laminated composite structures

A.E. Bogdanovich, C.M. Pastore, B.P. Deepak
{"title":"A comparison of various 3-D approaches for the analysis of laminated composite structures","authors":"A.E. Bogdanovich,&nbsp;C.M. Pastore,&nbsp;B.P. Deepak","doi":"10.1016/0961-9526(94)00080-S","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Three computational approaches for 3-D analysis of laminated composite plates are presented. These are displacement assumed approach, displacement assumed/equilibrium approach and mixed two-field approach. The fundamental concept in all of the three approaches is that “deficient” polynomials have to be used for the through-the-thickness displacement approximation. Bernstein polynomials, having discontinuous first derivatives at the interfaces, are used as approximation functions in the through-the-thickness direction. The examples of a double-sine distributed surface load on 3-ply, 9-ply, and sandwich plates examined by Pagano are solved. It is shown that the results obtained with all three present approaches agree excellently with the closed form solution, for the length-to-thickness aspect ratios ranging from 2–100. A comparison between the results obtained with the deficient and with the continuously differentiable displacement approximations is also presented. This reveals that polynomial approximations that are continuously differentiable through the whole thickness of a laminate, provide qualitatively incorrect transverse stresses at the interfaces. By increasing the degree of the polynomial, one gets two distinct <em>from the top</em> and <em>from the bottom</em> limits for any transverse stress component on the interfaces. On the contrary, when using deficient approximation functions one obtains the same <em>from the top</em> and <em>from the bottom</em> limits for the transverse stresses on the interfaces.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100298,"journal":{"name":"Composites Engineering","volume":"5 9","pages":"Pages 1105-1126"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0961-9526(94)00080-S","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Composites Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/096195269400080S","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Three computational approaches for 3-D analysis of laminated composite plates are presented. These are displacement assumed approach, displacement assumed/equilibrium approach and mixed two-field approach. The fundamental concept in all of the three approaches is that “deficient” polynomials have to be used for the through-the-thickness displacement approximation. Bernstein polynomials, having discontinuous first derivatives at the interfaces, are used as approximation functions in the through-the-thickness direction. The examples of a double-sine distributed surface load on 3-ply, 9-ply, and sandwich plates examined by Pagano are solved. It is shown that the results obtained with all three present approaches agree excellently with the closed form solution, for the length-to-thickness aspect ratios ranging from 2–100. A comparison between the results obtained with the deficient and with the continuously differentiable displacement approximations is also presented. This reveals that polynomial approximations that are continuously differentiable through the whole thickness of a laminate, provide qualitatively incorrect transverse stresses at the interfaces. By increasing the degree of the polynomial, one gets two distinct from the top and from the bottom limits for any transverse stress component on the interfaces. On the contrary, when using deficient approximation functions one obtains the same from the top and from the bottom limits for the transverse stresses on the interfaces.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
层合复合材料结构三维分析方法的比较
提出了复合材料层合板三维分析的三种计算方法。这些方法包括位移假设法、位移假设/平衡法和混合双场法。这三种方法的基本概念是,“缺陷”多项式必须用于贯穿厚度的位移近似。在界面处具有不连续一阶导数的伯恩斯坦多项式被用作沿厚度方向的近似函数。求解了Pagano检验的三层、九层和夹层板的双正弦分布表面荷载的实例。结果表明,当长厚比在2-100范围内时,三种方法得到的结果都与封闭形式解非常吻合。本文还比较了亏缺位移近似和连续可微位移近似的结果。这表明,在层压板的整个厚度上连续可微的多项式近似,在界面处提供定性不正确的横向应力。通过增加多项式的次数,可以得到两个不同于界面上任何横向应力分量的上限和下限。相反,当使用缺陷近似函数时,从界面上的横向应力的上下限可以得到相同的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Announcement Editorial Board Announcement Announcement Foreword
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1