Impact of bambara seed residue biochar and NPK on soil fertility, aggregate carbon and nitrogen concentrations and yield of cucumber

C. B. Okebalama, K. C. Asogwa, I. M. Uzoh, B. Marschner
{"title":"Impact of bambara seed residue biochar and NPK on soil fertility, aggregate carbon and nitrogen concentrations and yield of cucumber","authors":"C. B. Okebalama, K. C. Asogwa, I. M. Uzoh, B. Marschner","doi":"10.4314/as.v21i2.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The mechanisms of biochar effects on soil and crop yield are still elusive. Assessing the influence of biochar on total carbon (TC) and total nitrogen (TN) concentrations in hierarchical soil aggregates could provide an explanation. In a randomized complete block design were control, bambara seed residue biochar (BSB), NPK and NPK + BSB treatments superimposed on a two-year bambara seed residue amended Ultisols, in a four-year continuous cucumber cultivation. The effects of the treatments on optimizing cucumber yield and soil sustainability parameters, particularly the aggregate- (4.75-2.00, 1.00-2.00, 0.25-1.00 and < 0.25 mm) associated TC and TN concentrations were studied. The BSB and NPK + BSB treatments significantly (p ≤ 0.05) increased the concentrations of TC by 113.79 and 104.60%; TN by 100 and 87.50%; and available P by 172% and 415%, respectively. Furthermore, both treatments significantly reduced exchangeable Al3+ but increased Mg2+ and soil moisture content 4-6 weeks after planting. Exchangeable K+ was significantly increased by BSB. The BSB and NPK + BSB significantly improved TC and TN in all aggregate fractions with minimal effect in the 0.25-1.00 mm fraction. However, the overall percentile TC and TN increase by these treatments was more in the macro- (4.75-0.25 mm) than in the micro (< 0.25 mm) aggregates. Application of BSB and NPK + BSB significantly improved cucumber fruit weight by 12- and 24-fold, respectively, compared to NPK treatment. The study demonstrated that BSB enhanced soil fertility, while NPK + BSB further improved cucumber productivity. In addition, these treatments have the potential to substantially sequester carbon and nitrogen more in macro- than micro- aggregates.","PeriodicalId":15011,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agro-environmental Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agro-environmental Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/as.v21i2.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The mechanisms of biochar effects on soil and crop yield are still elusive. Assessing the influence of biochar on total carbon (TC) and total nitrogen (TN) concentrations in hierarchical soil aggregates could provide an explanation. In a randomized complete block design were control, bambara seed residue biochar (BSB), NPK and NPK + BSB treatments superimposed on a two-year bambara seed residue amended Ultisols, in a four-year continuous cucumber cultivation. The effects of the treatments on optimizing cucumber yield and soil sustainability parameters, particularly the aggregate- (4.75-2.00, 1.00-2.00, 0.25-1.00 and < 0.25 mm) associated TC and TN concentrations were studied. The BSB and NPK + BSB treatments significantly (p ≤ 0.05) increased the concentrations of TC by 113.79 and 104.60%; TN by 100 and 87.50%; and available P by 172% and 415%, respectively. Furthermore, both treatments significantly reduced exchangeable Al3+ but increased Mg2+ and soil moisture content 4-6 weeks after planting. Exchangeable K+ was significantly increased by BSB. The BSB and NPK + BSB significantly improved TC and TN in all aggregate fractions with minimal effect in the 0.25-1.00 mm fraction. However, the overall percentile TC and TN increase by these treatments was more in the macro- (4.75-0.25 mm) than in the micro (< 0.25 mm) aggregates. Application of BSB and NPK + BSB significantly improved cucumber fruit weight by 12- and 24-fold, respectively, compared to NPK treatment. The study demonstrated that BSB enhanced soil fertility, while NPK + BSB further improved cucumber productivity. In addition, these treatments have the potential to substantially sequester carbon and nitrogen more in macro- than micro- aggregates.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
竹籽渣生物炭和氮磷钾对土壤肥力、团聚碳氮浓度和黄瓜产量的影响
生物炭对土壤和作物产量的影响机制尚不清楚。评估生物炭对分层土壤团聚体中总碳(TC)和总氮(TN)浓度的影响可以提供一个解释。在连续栽培4年的黄瓜试验中,采用完全随机区组设计,将对照、班巴拉籽渣生物炭(BSB)、氮磷钾(NPK)和NPK + BSB处理在2年班巴拉籽渣改性Ultisols上进行。研究了不同处理对黄瓜产量和土壤可持续性参数的影响,特别是团聚体-(4.75 ~ 2.00、1.00 ~ 2.00、0.25 ~ 1.00和< 0.25 mm)相关TC和TN浓度的影响。BSB和NPK + BSB处理显著(p≤0.05)提高了TC浓度113.79%和104.60%;TN分别下降100和87.50%;有效磷分别降低172%和415%。此外,两种处理在种植后4 ~ 6周显著降低了交换性Al3+,但增加了Mg2+和土壤含水量。BSB显著提高了可交换K+。BSB和NPK + BSB显著提高了团聚体各组分的总磷和总氮,在0.25 ~ 1.00 mm组分的影响最小。然而,这些处理增加的总百分位数TC和TN在宏观(4.75 ~ 0.25 mm)高于微观(< 0.25 mm)团聚体。与氮磷钾处理相比,施用BSB和NPK + BSB分别显著提高了黄瓜果实质量12倍和24倍。研究表明,BSB能提高土壤肥力,而NPK + BSB能进一步提高黄瓜产量。此外,这些处理有可能在宏观团聚体中比在微观团聚体中更有效地固碳和氮。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Growth and mitotic chromosomes of soybean (Glycine max L. Merril) plants as affected by spent engine oil in sandy-loam soils Determinants of youth participation in agribusiness activities in Ikwuano Local Government Area, Abia State, Nigeria Intensity of palm fruit processing technology-use among palm fruits’ processors in onicha local government area in Ebonyi State, Nigeria Cultural practices and post-harvest handling of selected neglected food crops in south-east and South-south Nigeria Tied ridging enhances soil water conservation and productivity of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1