Theories, constructs and contexts in responsible leadership: a future research agenda

IF 4.5 Q1 MANAGEMENT Benchmarking-An International Journal Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI:10.1108/bij-11-2022-0699
P. Pathak, S. Jha
{"title":"Theories, constructs and contexts in responsible leadership: a future research agenda","authors":"P. Pathak, S. Jha","doi":"10.1108/bij-11-2022-0699","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe study explores the current research trends within the responsible leadership (RL) domain and proposes a future research agenda by conducting an extensive review of past research. The study aims to understand recent developments in theories, constructs and contexts in RL literature.Design/methodology/approachScopus database is used for the data collection on RL and patterns from 1998–2022. In total, 138 articles were covered for a systematic literature review (SLR) of RL behaviors. Further, the search was extended, and 109 more articles were included for bibliometric analysis of RL using R software. In total, 247 papers were reviewed.FindingsThe results present the consequences and antecedents of RL behaviors with external and internal stakeholders. Literature also indicates that researchers are more attentive to empirical studies with internal stakeholders, such as responsible leaders' impact on employee outcomes. Among theories, stakeholder theory's normative integrative and instrumental perspectives are used with RL.Research limitations/implicationsThe first limitation of the study is that this study collected data only from the Scopus database and the choice of language was English. Future studies may use other databases, languages and keywords. Instrumental and integrative RL behavioral styles would help balance organizations' financial and social goals.Originality/valueThis research enhances the literature on RL by combining content and bibliometric analysis to develop a more systematic and comprehensive understanding of integrative and instrumental leadership behaviors.","PeriodicalId":48029,"journal":{"name":"Benchmarking-An International Journal","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Benchmarking-An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/bij-11-2022-0699","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThe study explores the current research trends within the responsible leadership (RL) domain and proposes a future research agenda by conducting an extensive review of past research. The study aims to understand recent developments in theories, constructs and contexts in RL literature.Design/methodology/approachScopus database is used for the data collection on RL and patterns from 1998–2022. In total, 138 articles were covered for a systematic literature review (SLR) of RL behaviors. Further, the search was extended, and 109 more articles were included for bibliometric analysis of RL using R software. In total, 247 papers were reviewed.FindingsThe results present the consequences and antecedents of RL behaviors with external and internal stakeholders. Literature also indicates that researchers are more attentive to empirical studies with internal stakeholders, such as responsible leaders' impact on employee outcomes. Among theories, stakeholder theory's normative integrative and instrumental perspectives are used with RL.Research limitations/implicationsThe first limitation of the study is that this study collected data only from the Scopus database and the choice of language was English. Future studies may use other databases, languages and keywords. Instrumental and integrative RL behavioral styles would help balance organizations' financial and social goals.Originality/valueThis research enhances the literature on RL by combining content and bibliometric analysis to develop a more systematic and comprehensive understanding of integrative and instrumental leadership behaviors.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
负责任领导的理论、结构和背景:未来的研究议程
本研究探讨了责任领导(RL)领域的当前研究趋势,并通过对过去研究的广泛回顾,提出了未来的研究议程。本研究旨在了解强化学习文学的理论、结构和语境的最新发展。设计/方法/方法使用scopus数据库收集1998-2022年RL和模式的数据。系统文献综述(SLR)共收录了138篇关于强化学习行为的文章。进一步扩大检索范围,采用R软件对109篇文献进行文献计量学分析。共评审论文247篇。研究结果显示了与外部和内部利益相关者的强化学习行为的后果和前因。文献还表明,研究人员更关注内部利益相关者的实证研究,如负责任的领导者对员工结果的影响。在理论中,利益相关者理论的规范整合和工具视角被用于强化学习。研究局限性/启示本研究的第一个局限性是本研究仅从Scopus数据库中收集数据,并且选择的语言是英语。未来的研究可能会使用其他数据库、语言和关键词。工具性和综合性RL行为风格将有助于平衡组织的财务和社会目标。原创性/价值本研究通过内容分析和文献计量分析相结合的方法,加强了关于强化学习的文献,从而对整合型和工具性领导行为有了更系统和全面的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
16.10%
发文量
154
期刊介绍: Benchmarking is big news for companies committed to total quality programmes. Its enthusiastic reception by many prominent business figures has created high levels of interest in a technique which promises big rewards for co-operating partners. Yet, like total quality itself, it must be understood in its proper context, and implemented single mindedly if it is to be effective - this journal helps companies to decide if benchmarking is right for them, and shows them how to go about it successfully.
期刊最新文献
E-waste supply chain risk management: a framework considering omnichannel and circular economy The importance of warehouses in logistics outsourcing: benchmarking the perspectives of 3PL providers and shippers Finding the sweet spot in Industry 4.0 transformation: an exploration of the drivers, challenges and readiness of the Thai sugar industry The moderating effect of environmental performance on the relationship between sustainability assurance quality and firm value: a simultaneous equations approach Examining the relationships between big data analytics capability, entrepreneurial orientation and sustainable supply chain performance: moderating role of trust
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1