Quantitative and Fiber-Selective Evaluation for Central Poststroke Pain

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine Neural Plasticity Pub Date : 2022-06-06 DOI:10.1155/2022/1507291
Jian-Min Chen, Qing-Fa Chen, Zhi-Yong Wang, Guo-Xin Ni
{"title":"Quantitative and Fiber-Selective Evaluation for Central Poststroke Pain","authors":"Jian-Min Chen, Qing-Fa Chen, Zhi-Yong Wang, Guo-Xin Ni","doi":"10.1155/2022/1507291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The electrophysiological recording can be used to quantify the clinical features of central poststroke pain (CPSP) caused by different lesion locations. We aimed to explore the relationship between clinical features and lesion location in patients with CPSP using the current perception threshold (CPT) approach. Here, patients underwent the standardized CPT measure at five detection sites on both the contralesional and ipsilesional sides, using a constant alternating-current sinusoid waveform stimulus at three frequencies: 2000 Hz, 250 Hz, and 5 Hz. 57 CPSP patients were recruited in this cross-sectional study, including 13 patients with thalamic lesions and 44 patients with internal capsule lesions. Patients with a thalamic lesion had more frequent abnormal Aδ and C fibers than those with an internal capsule lesion (69.2% versus 36.4%, p value = 0.038; 53.8% versus 63.6%, p value = 0.038). The patients with internal capsule lesions had more frequent abnormal Aβ fibers than those with thalamic lesions (53.8% versus 63.6%, p value < 0.001). The sensory dysfunction in the patients with thalamic lesions was more likely to occur in the upper limbs (i.e., the shoulder (p value = 0.027) and the finger (p value = 0.040)). The lower limbs (i.e., the knee (p value = 0.040) and the toe (p value = 0.005)) were more likely to experience sensory dysfunction in the patients with internal capsule lesions. Hyperesthesia was more likely to occur in the thalamic patients, and hypoesthesia was more likely to occur in the patients with internal capsule lesions (p value < 0.001). In patients with thalamic lesions, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) had a positive correlation with 5 Hz CPT on the shoulder (r = 0.010, p value = 0.005), 250 Hz CPT on the finger (r = 0.690, p value = 0.009) from the contralesional side, and 2000 Hz CPT on the knee (r = 0.690, p value = 0.009). In patients with internal capsule lesions, VAS had a positive correlation with 2000 Hz CPT on the knee (r = 0.312, p value = 0.039) and foot (r = 0.538, p value < 0.001). In conclusion, the abnormal fiber types, sensory dysfunction territory, and clinical signs of CPSP in thalamic stroke differ from those in internal capsule stroke. Implementation of the portable and convenient CPT protocol may help clarify the locations of different stroke lesions in various clinical settings.","PeriodicalId":19122,"journal":{"name":"Neural Plasticity","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neural Plasticity","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1507291","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The electrophysiological recording can be used to quantify the clinical features of central poststroke pain (CPSP) caused by different lesion locations. We aimed to explore the relationship between clinical features and lesion location in patients with CPSP using the current perception threshold (CPT) approach. Here, patients underwent the standardized CPT measure at five detection sites on both the contralesional and ipsilesional sides, using a constant alternating-current sinusoid waveform stimulus at three frequencies: 2000 Hz, 250 Hz, and 5 Hz. 57 CPSP patients were recruited in this cross-sectional study, including 13 patients with thalamic lesions and 44 patients with internal capsule lesions. Patients with a thalamic lesion had more frequent abnormal Aδ and C fibers than those with an internal capsule lesion (69.2% versus 36.4%, p value = 0.038; 53.8% versus 63.6%, p value = 0.038). The patients with internal capsule lesions had more frequent abnormal Aβ fibers than those with thalamic lesions (53.8% versus 63.6%, p value < 0.001). The sensory dysfunction in the patients with thalamic lesions was more likely to occur in the upper limbs (i.e., the shoulder (p value = 0.027) and the finger (p value = 0.040)). The lower limbs (i.e., the knee (p value = 0.040) and the toe (p value = 0.005)) were more likely to experience sensory dysfunction in the patients with internal capsule lesions. Hyperesthesia was more likely to occur in the thalamic patients, and hypoesthesia was more likely to occur in the patients with internal capsule lesions (p value < 0.001). In patients with thalamic lesions, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) had a positive correlation with 5 Hz CPT on the shoulder (r = 0.010, p value = 0.005), 250 Hz CPT on the finger (r = 0.690, p value = 0.009) from the contralesional side, and 2000 Hz CPT on the knee (r = 0.690, p value = 0.009). In patients with internal capsule lesions, VAS had a positive correlation with 2000 Hz CPT on the knee (r = 0.312, p value = 0.039) and foot (r = 0.538, p value < 0.001). In conclusion, the abnormal fiber types, sensory dysfunction territory, and clinical signs of CPSP in thalamic stroke differ from those in internal capsule stroke. Implementation of the portable and convenient CPT protocol may help clarify the locations of different stroke lesions in various clinical settings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中枢性脑卒中后疼痛的定量和纤维选择性评估
电生理记录可量化不同部位引起的中枢性脑卒中后疼痛(CPSP)的临床特征。我们的目的是利用当前感知阈值(CPT)方法探讨CPSP患者的临床特征与病变位置之间的关系。在这里,患者在对侧和同侧的五个检测点进行了标准化的CPT测量,使用恒定的交流正弦波形刺激,频率为2000hz, 250hz和5hz。本横断面研究共招募了57例CPSP患者,其中丘脑病变13例,内囊病变44例。丘脑病变患者的a δ和C纤维异常发生率高于内囊病变患者(69.2%比36.4%,p值= 0.038;53.8% vs . 63.6%, p值= 0.038)。内囊病变患者Aβ纤维异常发生率高于丘脑病变患者(53.8%比63.6%,p值< 0.001)。丘脑病变患者感觉功能障碍多发生在上肢(即肩部(p值= 0.027)和手指(p值= 0.040))。内囊病变患者下肢(即膝关节(p值= 0.040)和脚趾(p值= 0.005))更容易出现感觉功能障碍。丘脑区患者更容易出现感觉亢进,内包膜病变患者更容易出现感觉低下(p值< 0.001)。丘脑病变患者视觉模拟评分(VAS)与肩部5hz CPT (r = 0.010, p值= 0.005)、对侧手指250hz CPT (r = 0.690, p值= 0.009)、膝关节2000hz CPT (r = 0.690, p值= 0.009)呈正相关。在有内囊病变的患者中,VAS评分与膝关节(r = 0.312, p值= 0.039)和足部(r = 0.538, p值< 0.001)2000 Hz CPT均呈正相关。综上所述,丘脑卒中的CPSP异常纤维类型、感觉功能障碍范围和临床体征与内囊卒中不同。实施便携方便的CPT方案可能有助于明确不同临床环境中不同脑卒中病变的位置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neural Plasticity
Neural Plasticity Neuroscience-Neurology
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Neural Plasticity is an international, interdisciplinary journal dedicated to the publication of articles related to all aspects of neural plasticity, with special emphasis on its functional significance as reflected in behavior and in psychopathology. Neural Plasticity publishes research and review articles from the entire range of relevant disciplines, including basic neuroscience, behavioral neuroscience, cognitive neuroscience, biological psychology, and biological psychiatry.
期刊最新文献
Modulation of High-Frequency rTMS on Reward Circuitry in Individuals with Nicotine Dependence: A Preliminary fMRI Study. Identifying ADHD-Related Abnormal Functional Connectivity with a Graph Convolutional Neural Network The Application of tDCS to Treat Pain and Psychocognitive Symptoms in Cancer Patients: A Scoping Review Clinical Comparison between HD-tDCS and tDCS for Improving Upper Limb Motor Function: A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Sham-Controlled Trial The Alterations in the Brain Corresponding to Low Back Pain: Recent Insights and Advances
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1