Local consultations on public space management: between political legitimation and citizen empowerment

IF 2.2 Q2 GEOGRAPHY SPACE AND POLITY Pub Date : 2020-05-22 DOI:10.1080/13562576.2020.1768061
Xavier Casademont Falguera, Òscar Prieto-Flores, Quim Brugué Torruella
{"title":"Local consultations on public space management: between political legitimation and citizen empowerment","authors":"Xavier Casademont Falguera, Òscar Prieto-Flores, Quim Brugué Torruella","doi":"10.1080/13562576.2020.1768061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In the last few years the number of local consultations has increased considerably in Catalonia. This formula was extended, from 2014 onwards, not only due to the knock-on effect of the self-determination referendums but also in order to resolve contentious issues related to the symbolic and urban management of public spaces. In this article we present the result of the analysis of four case studies, from which we can conclude that the consultations, in some cases, have served as an instrument for resolving internal conflicts between parties and avoiding electoral costs in the face of certain decisions.","PeriodicalId":46632,"journal":{"name":"SPACE AND POLITY","volume":"6 1","pages":"57 - 74"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SPACE AND POLITY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13562576.2020.1768061","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT In the last few years the number of local consultations has increased considerably in Catalonia. This formula was extended, from 2014 onwards, not only due to the knock-on effect of the self-determination referendums but also in order to resolve contentious issues related to the symbolic and urban management of public spaces. In this article we present the result of the analysis of four case studies, from which we can conclude that the consultations, in some cases, have served as an instrument for resolving internal conflicts between parties and avoiding electoral costs in the face of certain decisions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公共空间管理的地方协商:在政治合法化与公民赋权之间
在过去的几年里,加泰罗尼亚当地咨询的数量大幅增加。从2014年开始,这一公式得到了扩展,不仅是由于自决公投的连锁效应,也是为了解决与公共空间的象征性和城市管理相关的争议问题。在本文中,我们提出了对四个案例研究的分析结果,从中我们可以得出结论,在某些情况下,协商已成为解决各方之间内部冲突和在面对某些决定时避免选举费用的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
SPACE AND POLITY
SPACE AND POLITY GEOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: Space & Polity is a fully refereed scholarly international journal devoted to the theoretical and empirical understanding of the changing relationships between the state, and regional and local forms of governance. The journal provides a forum aimed particularly at bringing together social scientists currently working in a variety of disciplines, including geography, political science, sociology, economics, anthropology and development studies and who have a common interest in the relationships between space, place and politics in less developed as well as the advanced economies.
期刊最新文献
Political and public engagement as topological boundary-making: a critique of ‘Deficit’ approaches in post-communist CEE On purpose: solidarity by accident or design and the generative ambiguity in between Introduction to the special issue on the geographies of populism and populist geographies Sectarian, recreational, or anti-social? Interpreting juvenile violence in post-conflict Belfast Stuck between the EU ‘rock’ and UK ‘hard place’? Northern Ireland as a liminal space after Brexit
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1