{"title":"Experimental Study on GPR Detection of Voids inside and behind Tunnel Linings","authors":"H. Qin, Xiongyao Xie, Yu Tang, Zhengzheng Wang","doi":"10.2113/JEEG18-085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ground penetrating radar (GPR) is considered an effective tool to detect tunnel lining voids. In this paper, an experimental study was carried out using a physical tunnel lining model to evaluate the performances of different antenna frequencies. We built a 4.2 m–long, 4.2 m–wide, and 2.0 m–high experimental model to simulate the secondary lining, initial lining, and surrounding rock of a tunnel structure. In the model, we created four categories of voids, which are voids in secondary and initial linings, a delamination between the secondary and initial linings, a delamination between the initial lining and sand, and a void buried in the sand, to simulate real cases in tunnel engineering. The GPR wave velocities in the sand and concrete of the model were measured using the reflection method for the calibration of void depth. We employed a commercial GPR system equipped with antennae of different centre frequencies to detect the voids. GPR data were processed using a conventional data processing flow, and the performances of different frequencies were examined. The results show that the 1000 MHz centre frequency GPR is capable of characterizing shallow buried voids in the secondary lining but is not able to penetrate into the initial lining. The 250 MHz centre frequency GPR system is not advised to detect voids in or behind tunnel linings due to its low resolving power for voids of centimetre sizes. The 500 MHz centre frequency GPR system is optimal for void detection because it demonstrated a balanced performance of resolving ability and investigation depth. The findings of this work could be useful references for antenna selection and data processing in real GPR applications.","PeriodicalId":15748,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics","volume":"28 1","pages":"65-74"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2113/JEEG18-085","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10
Abstract
Ground penetrating radar (GPR) is considered an effective tool to detect tunnel lining voids. In this paper, an experimental study was carried out using a physical tunnel lining model to evaluate the performances of different antenna frequencies. We built a 4.2 m–long, 4.2 m–wide, and 2.0 m–high experimental model to simulate the secondary lining, initial lining, and surrounding rock of a tunnel structure. In the model, we created four categories of voids, which are voids in secondary and initial linings, a delamination between the secondary and initial linings, a delamination between the initial lining and sand, and a void buried in the sand, to simulate real cases in tunnel engineering. The GPR wave velocities in the sand and concrete of the model were measured using the reflection method for the calibration of void depth. We employed a commercial GPR system equipped with antennae of different centre frequencies to detect the voids. GPR data were processed using a conventional data processing flow, and the performances of different frequencies were examined. The results show that the 1000 MHz centre frequency GPR is capable of characterizing shallow buried voids in the secondary lining but is not able to penetrate into the initial lining. The 250 MHz centre frequency GPR system is not advised to detect voids in or behind tunnel linings due to its low resolving power for voids of centimetre sizes. The 500 MHz centre frequency GPR system is optimal for void detection because it demonstrated a balanced performance of resolving ability and investigation depth. The findings of this work could be useful references for antenna selection and data processing in real GPR applications.
期刊介绍:
The JEEG (ISSN 1083-1363) is the peer-reviewed journal of the Environmental and Engineering Geophysical Society (EEGS). JEEG welcomes manuscripts on new developments in near-surface geophysics applied to environmental, engineering, and mining issues, as well as novel near-surface geophysics case histories and descriptions of new hardware aimed at the near-surface geophysics community.