An approac h for adaptive model performance validation within digital twinning

Madhu Sudan Sapkota, E. Apeh, M. Hadfield, R. Haratian, R. Adey, J. Baynham
{"title":"An approac h for adaptive model performance validation within digital twinning","authors":"Madhu Sudan Sapkota, E. Apeh, M. Hadfield, R. Haratian, R. Adey, J. Baynham","doi":"10.2495/cmem-v9-n3-213-225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The validation of the operationality of models is considered a crucial step in the model development process. Recent developments in Digital Twinning (DT) enable the online availability of operational data from the physical asset required for operational validation. The benefits of DT in situations where operational validation has formed a basis for model adaptation has also been demonstrated. However, these benefits within DT have not been fully utilized due to the lack of an approach for benchmarking the required quantity, quality and diversity of validation data and performance metrics for online model validation and adaptation. Therefore, there is a need for a framework for benchmarking validation data and metrics requirements during model validation in different domains. An approach for benchmarking the required quantity, quality and variability of validation data and performance metric(s) for online model adaptation within DT is proposed. The approach is focused on addressing the problem of parameter(s) uncertainty of a predictive model within its uncertainty boundary. It involves generating virtual test models, a primary and another reference model for the performance evaluation of one compared to the another with the benchmarked validating data and metrics within DT. This process is repeated until the dataset and/or metric(s) are promising enough to validate primary model against the reference model. The proposed approach is demonstrated using BEASY – a simulator designed to predict protection provided by a cathodic protection system to an asset. In this case, a marine structure is the focus of the study, where the protection potentials to prevent corrosion are predicted over the life of the structure. The algorithm(s) for the approach are provided within a Scientific Software (MATLAB) and integrated to the simulator-based cathodic-protection model.","PeriodicalId":36958,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Computational Methods and Experimental Measurements","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Computational Methods and Experimental Measurements","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2495/cmem-v9-n3-213-225","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The validation of the operationality of models is considered a crucial step in the model development process. Recent developments in Digital Twinning (DT) enable the online availability of operational data from the physical asset required for operational validation. The benefits of DT in situations where operational validation has formed a basis for model adaptation has also been demonstrated. However, these benefits within DT have not been fully utilized due to the lack of an approach for benchmarking the required quantity, quality and diversity of validation data and performance metrics for online model validation and adaptation. Therefore, there is a need for a framework for benchmarking validation data and metrics requirements during model validation in different domains. An approach for benchmarking the required quantity, quality and variability of validation data and performance metric(s) for online model adaptation within DT is proposed. The approach is focused on addressing the problem of parameter(s) uncertainty of a predictive model within its uncertainty boundary. It involves generating virtual test models, a primary and another reference model for the performance evaluation of one compared to the another with the benchmarked validating data and metrics within DT. This process is repeated until the dataset and/or metric(s) are promising enough to validate primary model against the reference model. The proposed approach is demonstrated using BEASY – a simulator designed to predict protection provided by a cathodic protection system to an asset. In this case, a marine structure is the focus of the study, where the protection potentials to prevent corrosion are predicted over the life of the structure. The algorithm(s) for the approach are provided within a Scientific Software (MATLAB) and integrated to the simulator-based cathodic-protection model.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
数字孪生中自适应模型性能验证方法
模型可操作性的验证被认为是模型开发过程中的关键步骤。数字孪生(DT)的最新发展使操作验证所需的物理资产的操作数据能够在线可用。在操作验证已经形成模型适应基础的情况下,DT的好处也得到了证明。然而,由于缺乏对在线模型验证和适应所需的验证数据和性能指标的数量、质量和多样性进行基准测试的方法,DT中的这些优势尚未得到充分利用。因此,在不同领域的模型验证期间,需要一个框架来对验证数据和度量需求进行基准测试。提出了一种对DT内在线模型适应所需的验证数据和性能指标的数量、质量和可变性进行基准测试的方法。该方法主要解决预测模型在其不确定性边界内参数的不确定性问题。它包括生成虚拟测试模型,一个主要的和另一个参考模型,用于与DT内的基准验证数据和度量进行比较的性能评估。这个过程不断重复,直到数据集和/或度量足够有希望,可以根据参考模型验证主模型。该方法使用BEASY进行了演示,BEASY是一种用于预测阴极保护系统对资产提供保护的模拟器。在这种情况下,海洋结构是研究的重点,在结构的整个生命周期内预测防止腐蚀的保护潜力。该方法的算法在科学软件(MATLAB)中提供,并集成到基于模拟器的阴极保护模型中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
33 weeks
期刊最新文献
IndianFoodNet: Detecting Indian Food Items Using Deep Learning CFD Simulation of Premixed Flame in Counter Burner under the Influence of a Magnetic Field Chest Freezer Performance with Non-Condensable Gases Stress Distribution in Cantilever Beams with Different Hole Shapes: A Numerical Analysis Combined Impact of Joule Heating, Activation Energy, and Viscous Dissipation on Ternary Nanofluid Flow over Three Different Geometries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1