Comparison of the Effect of Creatine and Ginseng Supplementations on the Aerobic Power, Anaerobic Power, and Muscle Strength of the Male Players of the Iran National Epee Team

Thrita Pub Date : 2022-09-16 DOI:10.5812/thrita-128754
T. Bagherpour, Ahmad Yaghobi, N. Nemati
{"title":"Comparison of the Effect of Creatine and Ginseng Supplementations on the Aerobic Power, Anaerobic Power, and Muscle Strength of the Male Players of the Iran National Epee Team","authors":"T. Bagherpour, Ahmad Yaghobi, N. Nemati","doi":"10.5812/thrita-128754","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Measuring physical fitness by studying aerobic metabolism, anaerobic metabolism, and muscular strength in most sports research is one of the important indicators of professional athletes. Objectives: The aim of the present study was to compare six weeks of creatine supplementation and ginseng on the aerobic and anaerobic strength and muscle strength of the male players of the Iran national epee fencing team. Methods: This quasi-experimental study with a pretest-posttest design was performed on two experimental groups of creatine and ginseng as a double-blind study. A total of 14 male players of the national epee fencing team were assigned to two groups’ creatine supplement and ginseng supplement. The statistical significant difference was determined at P ≥ 0.05, and ANCOVA test was used to assess the differences between groups. All data were analyzed by the SPSS software version 25. Results: The results showed that the mean aerobic power in the creatine supplement group was significantly different from the ginseng supplement group (P = 0.001). In addition, the mean anaerobic control within the creatine supplement group is significantly higher than the ginseng supplement group (P = 0.001). The mean muscle strength in the creatine supplement group is significantly different from the ginseng group (P = 0.001). Higher mean aerobic power, anaerobic power, and muscle strength in the creatine supplement group, compared to the ginseng group, showed the more significant role of this supplement in raising aerobic power. Conclusions: It can be concluded that the role of creatine supplements in improving aerobic and anaerobic power and muscle strength could be more remarkable than the ginseng supplement.","PeriodicalId":23167,"journal":{"name":"Thrita","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thrita","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/thrita-128754","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Measuring physical fitness by studying aerobic metabolism, anaerobic metabolism, and muscular strength in most sports research is one of the important indicators of professional athletes. Objectives: The aim of the present study was to compare six weeks of creatine supplementation and ginseng on the aerobic and anaerobic strength and muscle strength of the male players of the Iran national epee fencing team. Methods: This quasi-experimental study with a pretest-posttest design was performed on two experimental groups of creatine and ginseng as a double-blind study. A total of 14 male players of the national epee fencing team were assigned to two groups’ creatine supplement and ginseng supplement. The statistical significant difference was determined at P ≥ 0.05, and ANCOVA test was used to assess the differences between groups. All data were analyzed by the SPSS software version 25. Results: The results showed that the mean aerobic power in the creatine supplement group was significantly different from the ginseng supplement group (P = 0.001). In addition, the mean anaerobic control within the creatine supplement group is significantly higher than the ginseng supplement group (P = 0.001). The mean muscle strength in the creatine supplement group is significantly different from the ginseng group (P = 0.001). Higher mean aerobic power, anaerobic power, and muscle strength in the creatine supplement group, compared to the ginseng group, showed the more significant role of this supplement in raising aerobic power. Conclusions: It can be concluded that the role of creatine supplements in improving aerobic and anaerobic power and muscle strength could be more remarkable than the ginseng supplement.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
补充肌酸和人参对伊朗国家重剑男子运动员有氧、无氧力量和肌肉力量的影响比较
背景:在大多数体育研究中,通过研究有氧代谢、无氧代谢和肌肉力量来衡量身体素质是专业运动员的重要指标之一。目的:本研究的目的是比较六周补充肌酸和人参对伊朗国家重剑队男子运动员有氧和无氧力量和肌肉力量的影响。方法:采用准实验设计,采用前测后测设计,对肌酸和人参两个实验组进行双盲研究。将14名国家重剑男子运动员分为肌酸补充组和人参补充组。P≥0.05为差异有统计学意义,组间差异采用ANCOVA检验。所有数据均采用SPSS软件25版进行分析。结果:结果表明,肌酸补充组的平均有氧能力与人参补充组有显著差异(P = 0.001)。此外,肌酸补充组的平均无氧控制显著高于人参补充组(P = 0.001)。肌酸补充组的平均肌力与人参组有显著差异(P = 0.001)。与人参组相比,肌酸补充剂组的平均有氧能力、无氧能力和肌肉力量更高,表明这种补充剂在提高有氧能力方面的作用更显著。结论:补充肌酸对大鼠有氧、无氧能力和肌力的改善作用比人参更显著。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Characteristics and Manifestations of Patients with Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis and Factors Associated with Unfavorable Functional Outcomes Olfactory Ectomesenchymal Stem Cells as a Potential Source in Nerve Tissue Engineering: A Letter Direct and Indirect Factors Affecting the Forced Swim Test to Investigate the Level of Depression in Rodents The Effect of Aerobic Exercise on SREBP-1c Gene Expression in Skeletal Muscle in Obese Female Rats The Effect of Eight Weeks of Home Cardiorespiratory Rehabilitation Exercise on the Cardiac Performance of 40-60-Year-Old Patients with Heart Failure
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1