Reflections on the call centre — a reply to Glucksmann

IF 3.8 3区 管理学 Q1 ECONOMICS Work Employment and Society Pub Date : 2007-06-01 DOI:10.1177/0950017007076644
P. Taylor, P. Bain
{"title":"Reflections on the call centre — a reply to Glucksmann","authors":"P. Taylor, P. Bain","doi":"10.1177/0950017007076644","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The point of departure is the welcome contribution to Work, Employment and Society by Miriam Glucksmann (2004) to the call centre debate. The principal contention of Call Configurations is that the existing literature has provided only limited conceptualization. For, she argues, despite the 'wealth of empirical data detailing the inner workings of call centres, managerial strategies and labour process … and their conditions of employment', providing 'material for debates about \"surveillance and resistance\", work degradation and the relevance of the electronic panopticon', a 'shift of prism' is required. Through an analytical framework focusing on 'process', 'relationality' and 'division of labour', Glucksmann's intention is to situate call centres within a broader economic sociology and overcome the widespread tendency to treat them as 'selfstanding sites of work'. In so doing, she utilizes her 'total social organization of labour' (TSOL) perspective, developed fully in her historical study of women workers (2000). Applied to call centres, TSOL 'is broadened from a focus on work and labour to a wider concern with the various parts or phases of the process in which that labour is conducted' (2004: 798). This means considering call centres as intermediaries within the 'overall configuration of production/distribution/exchange/ consumption' and provides the means for understanding the differing forms and roles they take at the levels of organization and labour. Operators no longer appear as 'homogenous or self-contained' because of identifiable variability in call operating and the linkages to occupations 'presupposed' by the call.","PeriodicalId":48187,"journal":{"name":"Work Employment and Society","volume":"12 1","pages":"349 - 362"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2007-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"52","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Work Employment and Society","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017007076644","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 52

Abstract

The point of departure is the welcome contribution to Work, Employment and Society by Miriam Glucksmann (2004) to the call centre debate. The principal contention of Call Configurations is that the existing literature has provided only limited conceptualization. For, she argues, despite the 'wealth of empirical data detailing the inner workings of call centres, managerial strategies and labour process … and their conditions of employment', providing 'material for debates about "surveillance and resistance", work degradation and the relevance of the electronic panopticon', a 'shift of prism' is required. Through an analytical framework focusing on 'process', 'relationality' and 'division of labour', Glucksmann's intention is to situate call centres within a broader economic sociology and overcome the widespread tendency to treat them as 'selfstanding sites of work'. In so doing, she utilizes her 'total social organization of labour' (TSOL) perspective, developed fully in her historical study of women workers (2000). Applied to call centres, TSOL 'is broadened from a focus on work and labour to a wider concern with the various parts or phases of the process in which that labour is conducted' (2004: 798). This means considering call centres as intermediaries within the 'overall configuration of production/distribution/exchange/ consumption' and provides the means for understanding the differing forms and roles they take at the levels of organization and labour. Operators no longer appear as 'homogenous or self-contained' because of identifiable variability in call operating and the linkages to occupations 'presupposed' by the call.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对呼叫中心的反思——对格鲁克斯曼的回复
出发点是米里亚姆•格鲁克斯曼(Miriam Glucksmann, 2004)在《工作、就业与社会》(Work, Employment and Society)一书中对呼叫中心辩论的有益贡献。调用配置的主要论点是,现有的文献只提供了有限的概念化。因为,她认为,尽管“丰富的经验数据详细描述了呼叫中心的内部运作、管理策略和劳动过程……以及他们的就业条件”,为“关于‘监视和抵抗’、工作退化和电子全景监狱的相关性的辩论提供了材料”,但“棱镜的转变”是必要的。通过关注“过程”、“关系”和“劳动分工”的分析框架,Glucksmann的意图是将呼叫中心置于更广泛的经济社会学中,并克服将其视为“独立工作场所”的普遍倾向。在这样做的过程中,她运用了她的“劳动总社会组织”(TSOL)的观点,在她对女工的历史研究中得到了充分的发展(2000)。应用于呼叫中心,TSOL“从对工作和劳动的关注扩大到对劳动过程的各个部分或阶段的更广泛的关注”(2004:798)。这意味着将呼叫中心视为“生产/分配/交换/消费的整体配置”中的中介,并提供理解它们在组织和劳动力层面上的不同形式和角色的方法。由于呼叫操作中可识别的可变性以及与呼叫“预设”的职业的联系,操作员不再表现为“同质或自包含”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
13.50%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: Work, Employment and Society (WES) is a leading international peer reviewed journal of the British Sociological Association which publishes theoretically informed and original research on the sociology of work. Work, Employment and Society covers all aspects of work, employment and unemployment and their connections with wider social processes and social structures. The journal is sociologically orientated but welcomes contributions from other disciplines which addresses the issues in a way that informs less debated aspects of the journal"s remit, such as unpaid labour and the informal economy.
期刊最新文献
Social Class in the Post-Industrial Labour Market: Assessing the Contemporary Relevance of the Erikson–Goldthorpe–Portocarero Class Schema Enhancing Career Studies with Realist Social Theory Labour Governance of Platforms: Market-Making and Market-Shaping in Delivery and Care Sectors in Belgium The Labour Process under Worker Control: Organisational Tensions in Worker Cooperatives Agency through Informality: How Bangladeshi Restaurant Owners Navigate Structural Constraints in Times of Crisis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1