Identification and Assessment of the Potential Error Causes in a Fertility and Infertility Center Using Pareto Analysis in Isfahan, Iran

A. Dehghan, S. Ehsanpour, Rouhollah Sheikh Abumasoudi
{"title":"Identification and Assessment of the Potential Error Causes in a Fertility and Infertility Center Using Pareto Analysis in Isfahan, Iran","authors":"A. Dehghan, S. Ehsanpour, Rouhollah Sheikh Abumasoudi","doi":"10.22038/PSJ.2020.44094.1252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Identifying errors and examining their causes in diagnostic and therapeutic processes is special conditions which has considerable impact on fertility medicine.  Porpuse: The purpose of this investigation is to identifying and assessing the causes of potential errors in the Isfahan Fertility and Infertility Center using Pareto analysis Materials and Methods: Data for this study were a Descriptive-analytic study approach was adopted to assess the management practice of twofold: 1. identification of errors in process of from admission to stimulate ovulation and 2. Evaluation of causes of errors in process by using Pareto analysis.  Results: Of the 5 proposed processes, 123 errors were identified. The result ,as shown in chart1, indicate that the most common causes of error in each of the 5 processes related to \"Mistake in entering the system information by personnel(13%), patient’s swarm(25%), Lack of knowledge(33%), Occupation of personnel(39%) and Doctor mistake in prescription(record, date and condition tests(45%).In fact, 80% of the causes of the error were in each of the 5 processes considered at 20% of them. Conclusion: Pareto chart seems to be a useful tool for identifying the main problem created by diagnostic and therapeutic processes and can identify the true cause of errors, including common errors.","PeriodicalId":16681,"journal":{"name":"Journal of patient safety and quality improvement","volume":"68 1","pages":"145-151"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of patient safety and quality improvement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22038/PSJ.2020.44094.1252","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Identifying errors and examining their causes in diagnostic and therapeutic processes is special conditions which has considerable impact on fertility medicine.  Porpuse: The purpose of this investigation is to identifying and assessing the causes of potential errors in the Isfahan Fertility and Infertility Center using Pareto analysis Materials and Methods: Data for this study were a Descriptive-analytic study approach was adopted to assess the management practice of twofold: 1. identification of errors in process of from admission to stimulate ovulation and 2. Evaluation of causes of errors in process by using Pareto analysis.  Results: Of the 5 proposed processes, 123 errors were identified. The result ,as shown in chart1, indicate that the most common causes of error in each of the 5 processes related to "Mistake in entering the system information by personnel(13%), patient’s swarm(25%), Lack of knowledge(33%), Occupation of personnel(39%) and Doctor mistake in prescription(record, date and condition tests(45%).In fact, 80% of the causes of the error were in each of the 5 processes considered at 20% of them. Conclusion: Pareto chart seems to be a useful tool for identifying the main problem created by diagnostic and therapeutic processes and can identify the true cause of errors, including common errors.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在伊朗伊斯法罕使用帕累托分析识别和评估生育和不孕症中心的潜在错误原因
在诊断和治疗过程中发现错误并检查其原因是对生育医学有相当大影响的特殊条件。目的:本研究的目的是利用帕累托分析来识别和评估伊斯法罕生育和不孕症中心潜在错误的原因。材料和方法:本研究的数据采用描述性分析研究方法来评估两方面的管理实践:1。2.从入院到促排卵过程中的错误识别。用帕累托分析法评价生产过程中错误的原因。结果:在5个提议的流程中,发现了123个错误。如图1所示,结果表明,在5个流程中,最常见的错误原因分别是“人员输入系统信息错误(13%)、患者群体(25%)、知识缺乏(33%)、人员职业(39%)和医生处方错误(记录、日期和条件测试)(45%)”。事实上,80%的错误原因是在5个过程中的每一个,其中20%被考虑。结论:帕累托图似乎是识别诊断和治疗过程中产生的主要问题的有用工具,可以识别错误的真正原因,包括常见错误。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Diagnosis of Lophomonas blattarum in bronchoalveolar lavage samples comparison of Social adjustment, school satisfaction and mental health in girls with and without precocious puberty A Critical Analysis Study of Pharmacological and Clinical Information Provided in Drug Package Inserts Based on Drugs and Cosmetics Rules Guidelines Evaluation of the Frequency of Stimulant and Opioid Abuse in the Poisoned Cases Referred To Hospitals in Ardabil, Iran Comparing Symptoms of Anxiety Disorders and Related Transdiagnostic Factors in Cancer Patients and Healthy Individuals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1