Suburban Densification in Oslo through the Lens of Social and Cultural Sustainability

Q3 Social Sciences Articulo - Journal of Urban Research Pub Date : 2014-10-13 DOI:10.4000/ARTICULO.2958
Rikke Stenbro, A. Skorupka, Kirsten Østensjø Kørte, E. B. Lunke, Hege Hellvik
{"title":"Suburban Densification in Oslo through the Lens of Social and Cultural Sustainability","authors":"Rikke Stenbro, A. Skorupka, Kirsten Østensjø Kørte, E. B. Lunke, Hege Hellvik","doi":"10.4000/ARTICULO.2958","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Contemporary Oslo has an annual population growth of circa 2% and viewed in a Norwegian perspective, it is growing faster than any other city. In this article we investigate whether social and cultural sustainability are taken in to account in the densification policy and practices taking place here. We start with an overview of research on socio-cultural sustainability and in particular how it has been addressed in the Norwegian context. After setting a theoretical and conceptual framework we investigate densification and social and cultural sustainability at different scales. Our analysis focuses on the policy level. We conduct a text analysis of the new municipal plan. Then, to provide a bottom-up perspective, we zoom in on one of the suburban areas, pointed out in the plan as a densification site. We combine survey with a mapping of the area and a description of its historical development to get an understanding of what the densification that has already taken place there, means for the residents. Our findings indicate that social and cultural resources are place specific. Additionally, what residents consider as resources valuable of being handed over for future generations is not always the same as what experts identify as worth preserving.","PeriodicalId":38124,"journal":{"name":"Articulo - Journal of Urban Research","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Articulo - Journal of Urban Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4000/ARTICULO.2958","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Contemporary Oslo has an annual population growth of circa 2% and viewed in a Norwegian perspective, it is growing faster than any other city. In this article we investigate whether social and cultural sustainability are taken in to account in the densification policy and practices taking place here. We start with an overview of research on socio-cultural sustainability and in particular how it has been addressed in the Norwegian context. After setting a theoretical and conceptual framework we investigate densification and social and cultural sustainability at different scales. Our analysis focuses on the policy level. We conduct a text analysis of the new municipal plan. Then, to provide a bottom-up perspective, we zoom in on one of the suburban areas, pointed out in the plan as a densification site. We combine survey with a mapping of the area and a description of its historical development to get an understanding of what the densification that has already taken place there, means for the residents. Our findings indicate that social and cultural resources are place specific. Additionally, what residents consider as resources valuable of being handed over for future generations is not always the same as what experts identify as worth preserving.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社会和文化可持续性视角下的奥斯陆郊区致密化
当代奥斯陆的人口年增长率约为2%,从挪威人的角度来看,它的增长速度比其他任何城市都要快。在这篇文章中,我们调查在这里发生的致密化政策和实践中是否考虑了社会和文化的可持续性。我们首先概述了社会文化可持续性的研究,特别是在挪威的背景下是如何解决的。在建立了理论和概念框架之后,我们在不同的尺度上研究了致密化以及社会和文化的可持续性。我们的分析主要集中在政策层面。我们对新的市政计划进行了文本分析。然后,为了提供一个自下而上的视角,我们放大了一个郊区,在规划中被指出是一个密集的地点。我们将调查与该地区的地图和对其历史发展的描述相结合,以了解已经发生的致密化对居民意味着什么。我们的研究结果表明,社会和文化资源是地方特有的。此外,居民认为值得留给后代的宝贵资源与专家认为值得保留的资源并不总是相同的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Articulo - Journal of Urban Research
Articulo - Journal of Urban Research Social Sciences-Urban Studies
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
The production of maquiladora space in Motul, Mexico: from henequen municipality to industrial city Second-hand shoe circulations in Tunis Globalizing urban research, grounding global production networks Urbanism as Myth and Ceremony Small commodities, big infrastructure
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1