Comparing time to intensification between insulin degludec/insulin aspart and insulin glargine: A single-center experience from India

R. Kovil
{"title":"Comparing time to intensification between insulin degludec/insulin aspart and insulin glargine: A single-center experience from India","authors":"R. Kovil","doi":"10.4103/jod.jod_20_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Aims: The objective of the study was to compare the percent of patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) requiring dose intensification and the time to dose intensification in patients on insulin degludec/insulin aspart (IDegAsp) versus those on basal insulin. Materials and Methods: Data were collected through retrospective chart review of patients with T2D being treated with insulin at a single center in India. The increase from once daily (OD) to twice daily dose or the addition of prandial insulin was considered as dose intensification. Chi-square test was conducted to compare the groups. Results: In the IDegAsp group (n = 515), 455 patients continued on the OD dose, and 60 patients (11.6%) were intensified. In the insulin glargine (IGlar) group (n = 173), 143 patients remained on the initial dose and 30 patients (17.34%) were intensified. Fewer patients on IDegAsp required treatment intensification than those on IGlar (P = 0.05). The time to treatment intensification (±standard deviation) was 11.98 ± 7.81 months in the IDegAsp group and 6.71 ± 6.86 months in the IGlar group. The time to treatment intensification was significantly longer in the IDegAsp than in the IGlar group (P = 0.0023). Conclusions: The study shows that significantly fewer patients on IDegAsp required dose intensification than those on IGlar. Additionally, the time to dose intensification was significantly delayed in patients on IDegAsp as compared to IGlar. However, HbA1c reduction with IGlar (nonintensified) was significant only at 6 months and failed to reach significance at 12 months, thereby pointing toward an early need for treatment intensification.","PeriodicalId":15627,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Diabetology","volume":"24 1","pages":"171 - 176"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Diabetology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jod.jod_20_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Aims: The objective of the study was to compare the percent of patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) requiring dose intensification and the time to dose intensification in patients on insulin degludec/insulin aspart (IDegAsp) versus those on basal insulin. Materials and Methods: Data were collected through retrospective chart review of patients with T2D being treated with insulin at a single center in India. The increase from once daily (OD) to twice daily dose or the addition of prandial insulin was considered as dose intensification. Chi-square test was conducted to compare the groups. Results: In the IDegAsp group (n = 515), 455 patients continued on the OD dose, and 60 patients (11.6%) were intensified. In the insulin glargine (IGlar) group (n = 173), 143 patients remained on the initial dose and 30 patients (17.34%) were intensified. Fewer patients on IDegAsp required treatment intensification than those on IGlar (P = 0.05). The time to treatment intensification (±standard deviation) was 11.98 ± 7.81 months in the IDegAsp group and 6.71 ± 6.86 months in the IGlar group. The time to treatment intensification was significantly longer in the IDegAsp than in the IGlar group (P = 0.0023). Conclusions: The study shows that significantly fewer patients on IDegAsp required dose intensification than those on IGlar. Additionally, the time to dose intensification was significantly delayed in patients on IDegAsp as compared to IGlar. However, HbA1c reduction with IGlar (nonintensified) was significant only at 6 months and failed to reach significance at 12 months, thereby pointing toward an early need for treatment intensification.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较降糖糖胰岛素/分离胰岛素和甘精胰岛素的强化时间:来自印度的单中心经验
背景和目的:本研究的目的是比较2型糖尿病(T2D)患者需要剂量强化的百分比,以及使用degludec/insulin aspart (IDegAsp)与使用基础胰岛素的患者需要剂量强化的时间。材料和方法:通过回顾性图表分析在印度单一中心接受胰岛素治疗的T2D患者的数据。从每日1次剂量增加到每日2次剂量或添加膳食胰岛素被认为是剂量强化。组间比较采用卡方检验。结果:IDegAsp组(n = 515)中,455例患者继续给予OD剂量,60例患者(11.6%)强化用药。在甘精胰岛素(IGlar)组(n = 173), 143例患者保持初始剂量,30例患者(17.34%)加强。IDegAsp组需要强化治疗的患者少于IGlar组(P = 0.05)。IDegAsp组到治疗强化时间(±标准差)为11.98±7.81个月,IGlar组为6.71±6.86个月。IDegAsp组治疗强化时间明显长于IGlar组(P = 0.0023)。结论:研究表明,使用IDegAsp的患者需要剂量强化的人数明显少于使用IGlar的患者。此外,与IGlar相比,IDegAsp患者到剂量强化的时间显着延迟。然而,IGlar(非强化)的HbA1c降低仅在6个月时显著,在12个月时未达到显著性,因此提示早期需要强化治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Emerging glucagon-based therapies in diabetes mellitus: Toward a better future in diabetes care Eating disorders and type 1 diabetes as a significant problem An update on the role of antihyperglycemic agents in diabetoporosis Effect of combination of Curcuma longa with Emblica officinalis in females with polycystic ovarian syndrome: An open-label, randomized active-controlled, exploratory clinical study Maternally inherited diabetes mellitus and deafness (MIDD): A case report and review of literature
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1