Care transition from rehabilitation to home: A QI project using the RED Toolkit to decrease readmission rates

J. Bernard, E. Creel, Rhonda K. Pecoraro
{"title":"Care transition from rehabilitation to home: A QI project using the RED Toolkit to decrease readmission rates","authors":"J. Bernard, E. Creel, Rhonda K. Pecoraro","doi":"10.5430/JHA.V10N1P46","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This quality improvement (QI) project’s aim was to lower 30-day healthcare reutilization for patients aged 50 or older with hip fracture using an evidence-based discharge process method, the Re-Engineered Discharge (RED) Toolkit.Methods: The QI project of a revised patient discharge process to lower healthcare reutilization of Baton Rouge Rehabilitation Hospital (BRRH) hip fracture patients was implemented as an evidence-based quality improvement initiative. Inpatient and outpatient discharge process revisions were implemented at an inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF) based on Re-Engineered Discharge (RED) Toolkit recommendations. Inpatient revisions included patient barrier identification with associated documentation changes to the IRF interdisciplinary team form. Outpatient modifications consisted of an After-Hospital Care Plan (AHCP), and two post-discharge Telephone Follow-Up (TFU) calls.Results: Healthcare reutilization and thirty-day hospital readmission for this project were measured at 8.5% and 5.7%, respectively. A decrease in healthcare reutilization of at least 1.6% was observed for the IRF. Most participants scored at a high level (88.6%) of “patient knowledge of self-management” post intervention. Out of participants who did not attend their first Primary Care Provider (PCP) appointment, 33.3% experienced healthcare reutilization. This result emphasized the importance of seeing one’s PCP post-discharge. Patient satisfaction increased by 5% and 6.73%, measured by Hospital Consumer Assessment of HealthCare Providers and Systems (HCAHP) scores for nursing care and physician care, respectively.Conclusions: Implementation of a RED Toolkit-based discharge process at an IRF positively impacted all three study outcomes and associated healthcare costs in lowering preventable readmissions.","PeriodicalId":15872,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hospital Administration","volume":"246 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hospital Administration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5430/JHA.V10N1P46","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This quality improvement (QI) project’s aim was to lower 30-day healthcare reutilization for patients aged 50 or older with hip fracture using an evidence-based discharge process method, the Re-Engineered Discharge (RED) Toolkit.Methods: The QI project of a revised patient discharge process to lower healthcare reutilization of Baton Rouge Rehabilitation Hospital (BRRH) hip fracture patients was implemented as an evidence-based quality improvement initiative. Inpatient and outpatient discharge process revisions were implemented at an inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF) based on Re-Engineered Discharge (RED) Toolkit recommendations. Inpatient revisions included patient barrier identification with associated documentation changes to the IRF interdisciplinary team form. Outpatient modifications consisted of an After-Hospital Care Plan (AHCP), and two post-discharge Telephone Follow-Up (TFU) calls.Results: Healthcare reutilization and thirty-day hospital readmission for this project were measured at 8.5% and 5.7%, respectively. A decrease in healthcare reutilization of at least 1.6% was observed for the IRF. Most participants scored at a high level (88.6%) of “patient knowledge of self-management” post intervention. Out of participants who did not attend their first Primary Care Provider (PCP) appointment, 33.3% experienced healthcare reutilization. This result emphasized the importance of seeing one’s PCP post-discharge. Patient satisfaction increased by 5% and 6.73%, measured by Hospital Consumer Assessment of HealthCare Providers and Systems (HCAHP) scores for nursing care and physician care, respectively.Conclusions: Implementation of a RED Toolkit-based discharge process at an IRF positively impacted all three study outcomes and associated healthcare costs in lowering preventable readmissions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从康复到家庭的护理过渡:一个使用RED工具包降低再入院率的QI项目
目的:本质量改进(QI)项目的目的是使用循证出院流程方法,即重新设计出院(RED)工具包,降低50岁及以上髋部骨折患者30天的医疗保健重复使用。方法:将巴吞鲁日康复医院(BRRH)髋部骨折患者出院流程修订的QI项目作为循证质量改进倡议实施。根据重新设计出院(RED)工具包的建议,在住院康复设施(IRF)实施住院和门诊出院流程修订。住院患者的修订包括患者障碍识别,以及对IRF跨学科团队表格的相关文档更改。门诊修改包括一个出院后护理计划(AHCP)和两个出院后电话随访(TFU)电话。结果:该项目的医疗服务再利用率和30天住院率分别为8.5%和5.7%。观察到,IRF的医疗保健再利用率至少下降了1.6%。大多数参与者在干预后的“患者自我管理知识”得分较高(88.6%)。在没有第一次参加初级保健提供者(PCP)预约的参与者中,33.3%的人经历了医疗保健再利用。这个结果强调了出院后看PCP的重要性。通过医院消费者医疗服务提供者和系统评估(HCAHP)对护理和医生护理的评分,患者满意度分别提高了5%和6.73%。结论:在IRF实施基于RED工具包的出院流程对所有三项研究结果和降低可预防再入院的相关医疗成本产生了积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The reality of patient bodily waste management: Nurse perceptions of current practice & staff safety Facilitators and barriers for high-reliability training in medical centers Quality of care and emergency department throughput during the COVID-19 pandemic in a community health system Pandemic in a Community Health System Comparison of nursing staffing ratio in selected safety net and non-safety net hospitals in the United States Challenges and opportunities in achieving secure hospital clinical mobility management: An illustrative use case
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1