Perception of cuts in different editing styles

IF 2.6 4区 管理学 Q1 COMMUNICATION Profesional De La Informacion Pub Date : 2021-03-06 DOI:10.3145/EPI.2021.MAR.06
Celia Andreu-Sánchez, M. Martín-Pascual
{"title":"Perception of cuts in different editing styles","authors":"Celia Andreu-Sánchez, M. Martín-Pascual","doi":"10.3145/EPI.2021.MAR.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The goal of this work is to explain how the cuts and their insertion in different editing styles influence the attention of viewers. The starting hypothesis is that viewers’ response to cuts varies depending on whether they watch a movie with a classical versus a messy or chaotic editing style. To undertake this investigation, we created three videos with the same narrative content and duration but different editing styles. One video was a fixed one-shot movie. Another video followed a classical editing style, based on the rules of classic Hollywood movies, according to David Bordwell’s studies. The other video used a chaotic style, beyond post-classic, which broke the classical rules of continuity and was inspired by music video clips. We showed these stimuli to 40 subjects while recording their brain activity using the electroencephalography (EEG) technique. The results showed that cuts reduce the eyeblink frequency during the second after they are seen. Since blinking is a well-known attention marker, we propose that cuts increase viewers’ attention. Cuts initiate a flow of electrical activity from the visual cortex to the cognitive processing zone in the prefrontal area. We also found that the different editing styles in which cuts are inserted affected perception, confirming the initial hypothesis. These results could be of great interest and utility for creators of audiovisual content and the management of attention in their work.","PeriodicalId":20684,"journal":{"name":"Profesional De La Informacion","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Profesional De La Informacion","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3145/EPI.2021.MAR.06","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The goal of this work is to explain how the cuts and their insertion in different editing styles influence the attention of viewers. The starting hypothesis is that viewers’ response to cuts varies depending on whether they watch a movie with a classical versus a messy or chaotic editing style. To undertake this investigation, we created three videos with the same narrative content and duration but different editing styles. One video was a fixed one-shot movie. Another video followed a classical editing style, based on the rules of classic Hollywood movies, according to David Bordwell’s studies. The other video used a chaotic style, beyond post-classic, which broke the classical rules of continuity and was inspired by music video clips. We showed these stimuli to 40 subjects while recording their brain activity using the electroencephalography (EEG) technique. The results showed that cuts reduce the eyeblink frequency during the second after they are seen. Since blinking is a well-known attention marker, we propose that cuts increase viewers’ attention. Cuts initiate a flow of electrical activity from the visual cortex to the cognitive processing zone in the prefrontal area. We also found that the different editing styles in which cuts are inserted affected perception, confirming the initial hypothesis. These results could be of great interest and utility for creators of audiovisual content and the management of attention in their work.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
感知不同编辑风格的剪辑
这项工作的目的是解释在不同的编辑风格中,剪辑和插入是如何影响观众的注意力的。最初的假设是,观众对剪辑的反应取决于他们观看的是经典剪辑还是凌乱或混乱剪辑。为了进行这次调查,我们制作了三个叙事内容和时长相同,但编辑风格不同的视频。一个视频是固定的单镜头电影。根据David Bordwell的研究,另一个视频采用了经典的剪辑风格,基于经典好莱坞电影的规则。另一个视频使用了一种混乱的风格,超越了后古典,打破了古典的连续性规则,灵感来自音乐视频剪辑。我们向40名受试者展示这些刺激,同时使用脑电图(EEG)技术记录他们的大脑活动。结果表明,伤口在被看到后的一秒钟内减少了眨眼频率。因为眨眼是一种众所周知的注意力标记,所以我们认为切镜头会增加观众的注意力。割伤会引发从视觉皮层到前额叶认知处理区的电活动流。我们还发现,插入剪辑的不同剪辑风格会影响感知,证实了最初的假设。这些结果对视听内容的创作者和他们工作中的注意力管理具有极大的兴趣和实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
9.50%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: El profesional de la información es una revista sobre información, bibliotecas y nuevas tecnologías de la información. Primera revista española de Biblioteconomía y Documentación indexada por las dos bases de datos bibliográficas internacionales más importantes: ISI Social Science Citation Index y Scopus
期刊最新文献
Perceptions of online education among 16-18-year-olds: Differences and similarities in their interests and preferred formats according to where they live Informal learning of Spanish in a Chinese music fan community Social responsibility of Spanish universities for sustainable relationships Political polarization and politainment: Methodology for analyzing crypto hate speech on TikTok Political polarization and emotion rhetoric in the US presidential transition: A comparative study of Trump and Biden on Twitter and the post-election impact on the public
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1