Gaps in the System

Sherri T Reynolds
{"title":"Gaps in the System","authors":"Sherri T Reynolds","doi":"10.29173/CMPLCT10020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Deborah Seltzer-Kelly et al, created a most interesting symposium which was the basis for the Feature Article in this issue, (Re)imagining teacher preparation for conjoint democratic inquiry in complex classroom ecologies. True to the heart of complexity and post-modern thought, the article has selected a series of perspectives that, while compatible, cannot really be resolved into a single meta-narrative. I find that a very Batesonian approach in that Gregory Bateson (2000) believed so strongly in what he called gappiness. Complex systems and complex ideas, by their nature, cannot be easily described except metaphorically and when we try to get too specific, when we try to eliminate the messiness, we flatten the system. Metaphor, for Bateson and perhaps for this SIG, is the heart of description for complex ideas and, like Bateson, we should perhaps refuse to explain our metaphors. There were two threads in the paper to which I would like to respond: the fault lines in systems related to schooling and some places we might look for remedy.","PeriodicalId":43228,"journal":{"name":"Complicity-An International Journal of Complexity and Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Complicity-An International Journal of Complexity and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29173/CMPLCT10020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Deborah Seltzer-Kelly et al, created a most interesting symposium which was the basis for the Feature Article in this issue, (Re)imagining teacher preparation for conjoint democratic inquiry in complex classroom ecologies. True to the heart of complexity and post-modern thought, the article has selected a series of perspectives that, while compatible, cannot really be resolved into a single meta-narrative. I find that a very Batesonian approach in that Gregory Bateson (2000) believed so strongly in what he called gappiness. Complex systems and complex ideas, by their nature, cannot be easily described except metaphorically and when we try to get too specific, when we try to eliminate the messiness, we flatten the system. Metaphor, for Bateson and perhaps for this SIG, is the heart of description for complex ideas and, like Bateson, we should perhaps refuse to explain our metaphors. There were two threads in the paper to which I would like to respond: the fault lines in systems related to schooling and some places we might look for remedy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
制度上的漏洞
Deborah Seltzer-Kelly等人创建了一个非常有趣的研讨会,这是本期专题文章的基础,(重新)想象教师在复杂的课堂生态中为联合民主探究做准备。这篇文章忠实于复杂性和后现代思想的核心,选择了一系列观点,这些观点虽然兼容,但不能真正解决为一个单一的元叙事。我发现了一个非常贝特森式的方法,格雷戈里·贝特森(2000)非常坚信他所谓的幸福。复杂的系统和复杂的思想,就其本质而言,不容易被描述,除非用隐喻来描述,当我们试图变得过于具体,当我们试图消除混乱时,我们就会使系统变得扁平化。隐喻,对贝特森来说,也许对SIG来说,是描述复杂思想的核心,像贝特森一样,我们也许应该拒绝解释我们的隐喻。我想对论文中的两条线索做出回应:与学校教育相关的系统中的断层线,以及我们可能寻求补救的一些地方。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Toward a Learning Progression of Complex Systems Understanding Exploring the Effects of Creating Small High Schools on Daily Attendance: A Statistical Case Study Design Considerations for Education Scholars Interested in Complex Systems Research Editorial Introduction: Proceedings of the Second Satellite Symposium on Complex Systems and Education, Held at the Conference on Complex Systems, Cancun, Mexico, September 20, 2017 NiCE Teacher Workshop: Engaging K-12 Teachers in the Development of Curricular Materials That Utilize Complex Networks Concepts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1