“Occasional extinction or more likely occultation”

IF 0.3 0 LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM Samuel Beckett Today/Aujourd''hui Pub Date : 2019-04-11 DOI:10.1163/18757405-03101007
W. Davies
{"title":"“Occasional extinction or more likely occultation”","authors":"W. Davies","doi":"10.1163/18757405-03101007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This article analyses Samuel Beckett’s unpublished prose piece “Long Observation of the Ray” (UoR MS 2909; 1975–1976) and considers the formal, thematic, and intertextual aspects of the text in order to reflect on its ‘abandoned’ status. By drawing attention to possible sources for the linguistic and descriptive choices that Beckett makes throughout the manuscript, the article argues that the text represents a partial return to the author’s abiding interest in calculations of light and distance first prompted by his study of astronomy, a return which he uses to further his experimentation with form and structure in “Long Observation of the Ray” and beyond.","PeriodicalId":53231,"journal":{"name":"Samuel Beckett Today/Aujourd''hui","volume":"64 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Samuel Beckett Today/Aujourd''hui","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/18757405-03101007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This article analyses Samuel Beckett’s unpublished prose piece “Long Observation of the Ray” (UoR MS 2909; 1975–1976) and considers the formal, thematic, and intertextual aspects of the text in order to reflect on its ‘abandoned’ status. By drawing attention to possible sources for the linguistic and descriptive choices that Beckett makes throughout the manuscript, the article argues that the text represents a partial return to the author’s abiding interest in calculations of light and distance first prompted by his study of astronomy, a return which he uses to further his experimentation with form and structure in “Long Observation of the Ray” and beyond.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“偶尔消失或更可能是掩星”
本文分析了塞缪尔·贝克特未发表的散文《对光线的长期观察》(UoR MS 2909;1975-1976),并考虑文本的形式、主题和互文方面,以反映其“被抛弃”的状态。通过关注贝克特在整个手稿中所做的语言和描述选择的可能来源,文章认为,文本代表了作者对光和距离计算的持久兴趣的部分回归,这首先是由他对天文学的研究引起的,他利用这种回归来进一步他在“光线的长期观察”中对形式和结构的实验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
期刊最新文献
Beckett’s Prose Fiction and Waiting for Godot En attendant… l’innommable Reimagining Godot The Good-for-Nothing En attendant Godot (1952) de Samuel Beckett et Gerry (2002) de Gus Van Sant au prisme de Gilles Deleuze
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1