Machine Learning-Based Control for Fuel Cell Hybrid Buses: From Average Load Power Prediction to Energy Management

Hujun Peng, Jianxiang Li, Kai Deng, K. Hameyer
{"title":"Machine Learning-Based Control for Fuel Cell Hybrid Buses: From Average Load Power Prediction to Energy Management","authors":"Hujun Peng, Jianxiang Li, Kai Deng, K. Hameyer","doi":"10.3390/vehicles4040072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this work, a machine learning-based energy management system is developed using a long short-term memory (LSTM) network for fuel cell hybrid buses. The neural network implicitly learns the complex relationship between various factors and the optimal power control from massive data. The selection of the neural network inputs is inspired by the adaptive Pontryagin’s minimum principle (APMP) strategy. Since an estimated value of the global average fuel cell power is required in the machine learning-based energy management strategy (EMS), some global features of driving cycles are extracted and then applied in a feedforward neural network to predict the average fuel cell power appropriately. The effectiveness of the machine learning-based energy management, with the integration of the mechanism of estimating the average fuel cell power based on the forward neural network, is tested under two different driving cycles from the training environment, with comparisons to a commercially used rule-based strategy. Based on the simulation results, the learning-based strategy outperforms the rule-based strategy regarding the charge-sustaining mode conditions and fuel economy. Moreover, compared to the best offline hydrogen consumption, the machine learning-based strategy consumed 0.58% and 0.36% more than the best offline results for both driving cycles. In contrast, the rule-based strategy consumed 1.80% and 0.96% more than optimal offline results for the two driving cycles, respectively. Finally, simulations under battery and fuel cell aging conditions show that the fuel economy of the machine learning-based strategy experiences no performance degradation under components aging compared to offline strategies.","PeriodicalId":73282,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium. IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium. IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/vehicles4040072","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this work, a machine learning-based energy management system is developed using a long short-term memory (LSTM) network for fuel cell hybrid buses. The neural network implicitly learns the complex relationship between various factors and the optimal power control from massive data. The selection of the neural network inputs is inspired by the adaptive Pontryagin’s minimum principle (APMP) strategy. Since an estimated value of the global average fuel cell power is required in the machine learning-based energy management strategy (EMS), some global features of driving cycles are extracted and then applied in a feedforward neural network to predict the average fuel cell power appropriately. The effectiveness of the machine learning-based energy management, with the integration of the mechanism of estimating the average fuel cell power based on the forward neural network, is tested under two different driving cycles from the training environment, with comparisons to a commercially used rule-based strategy. Based on the simulation results, the learning-based strategy outperforms the rule-based strategy regarding the charge-sustaining mode conditions and fuel economy. Moreover, compared to the best offline hydrogen consumption, the machine learning-based strategy consumed 0.58% and 0.36% more than the best offline results for both driving cycles. In contrast, the rule-based strategy consumed 1.80% and 0.96% more than optimal offline results for the two driving cycles, respectively. Finally, simulations under battery and fuel cell aging conditions show that the fuel economy of the machine learning-based strategy experiences no performance degradation under components aging compared to offline strategies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于机器学习的燃料电池混合动力公共汽车控制:从平均负载功率预测到能量管理
在这项工作中,使用燃料电池混合动力公共汽车的长短期记忆(LSTM)网络开发了基于机器学习的能量管理系统。神经网络从海量数据中隐式学习各种因素之间的复杂关系,实现最优功率控制。神经网络输入的选择受到自适应庞特里亚金最小原则(APMP)策略的启发。由于基于机器学习的能量管理策略(EMS)需要燃料电池的全局平均功率估计值,因此提取了行驶周期的一些全局特征,并将其应用于前馈神经网络中,对燃料电池的平均功率进行了适当的预测。结合基于前向神经网络的燃料电池平均功率估计机制,在训练环境的两个不同驾驶循环下测试了基于机器学习的能量管理的有效性,并与商业使用的基于规则的策略进行了比较。仿真结果表明,基于学习的策略在电荷保持模式条件和燃油经济性方面优于基于规则的策略。此外,与最佳离线氢消耗相比,基于机器学习的策略在两种驾驶循环中都比最佳离线氢消耗多0.58%和0.36%。相比之下,在两个驾驶循环中,基于规则的策略分别比最优的离线结果多消耗1.80%和0.96%。最后,在电池和燃料电池老化条件下的仿真表明,与离线策略相比,基于机器学习的策略在组件老化下的燃油经济性没有性能下降。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Feedback Field-Weakening Techniques for Synchronous Machines with Permanent Magnets Synthetic Drivers’ Performance Measures Related to Vehicle Dynamics to Control Road Safety in Curves Diesel Particle Filter Requirements for Euro 7 Technology Continuously Regenerating Heavy-Duty Applications Hybridisation Concept of Light Vehicles Utilising an Electrified Planetary Gear Set A Co-Simulation Platform with Tire and Brake Thermal Model for the Analysis and Reproduction of Blanking
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1