The Role of CO2 in Carbonate Acidizing at the Field Scale – A Multi-Phase Perspective

H. Kumar, Sajjaat Muhemmed, H. Nasr-El-Din
{"title":"The Role of CO2 in Carbonate Acidizing at the Field Scale – A Multi-Phase Perspective","authors":"H. Kumar, Sajjaat Muhemmed, H. Nasr-El-Din","doi":"10.2118/206033-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Most lab-scale acidizing experiments are performed in core samples with 100% water saturation conditions and at pore pressures around 1100 psi. However, this is seldom the case on the field, where different saturation conditions exist with high temperature and pressure conditions. Carbon-di-Oxide (CO2), a by-product evolved during the acidizing process, is long thought to behave inertly during the acidizing process. Recent investigations reveal that the presence of CO2 dynamically changes the behavior of wormhole patterns and acid efficiency.\n A compositional simulation technique was adopted to understand the process thoroughly. A validated compositional numerical model capable of replicating acidizing experiments at the core-scale level, in fully aqueous environments described in published literature was utilized in this study. The numerical model was extended to a three-phase environment and applied at the field scale level to monitor and evaluate the impacts of evolved CO2 during the carbonate acidizing processes. Lessons learned from the lab-scale were tested at the field-scale scenario via a numerical model with radial coordinates.\n Contrary to popular belief, high pore pressures of 1,000 psi and above are not sufficient to keep all the evolved CO2 in solution. The presence of CO2 as a separate phase hinders acid efficiency. The reach or extent of the evolved CO2 is shown to exist only near the damage zone and seldom penetrates the reservoir matrix. Based on the field scale model's predictions, this study warrants conducting acidizing experiments at the laboratory level, at precisely similar pressure, temperature, and salinity conditions faced in the near-wellbore region, and urges the application of compositional modeling techniques to account for CO2 evolution, while studying and predicting matrix acidizing jobs.","PeriodicalId":10928,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Wed, September 22, 2021","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Wed, September 22, 2021","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/206033-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Most lab-scale acidizing experiments are performed in core samples with 100% water saturation conditions and at pore pressures around 1100 psi. However, this is seldom the case on the field, where different saturation conditions exist with high temperature and pressure conditions. Carbon-di-Oxide (CO2), a by-product evolved during the acidizing process, is long thought to behave inertly during the acidizing process. Recent investigations reveal that the presence of CO2 dynamically changes the behavior of wormhole patterns and acid efficiency. A compositional simulation technique was adopted to understand the process thoroughly. A validated compositional numerical model capable of replicating acidizing experiments at the core-scale level, in fully aqueous environments described in published literature was utilized in this study. The numerical model was extended to a three-phase environment and applied at the field scale level to monitor and evaluate the impacts of evolved CO2 during the carbonate acidizing processes. Lessons learned from the lab-scale were tested at the field-scale scenario via a numerical model with radial coordinates. Contrary to popular belief, high pore pressures of 1,000 psi and above are not sufficient to keep all the evolved CO2 in solution. The presence of CO2 as a separate phase hinders acid efficiency. The reach or extent of the evolved CO2 is shown to exist only near the damage zone and seldom penetrates the reservoir matrix. Based on the field scale model's predictions, this study warrants conducting acidizing experiments at the laboratory level, at precisely similar pressure, temperature, and salinity conditions faced in the near-wellbore region, and urges the application of compositional modeling techniques to account for CO2 evolution, while studying and predicting matrix acidizing jobs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
二氧化碳在油田酸化过程中的作用——多阶段视角
大多数实验室规模的酸化实验都是在岩心样品中进行的,水饱和度为100%,孔隙压力为1100 psi左右。然而,在高温高压条件下存在不同饱和度条件的油田中,这种情况很少出现。二氧化碳是酸化过程中产生的副产物,长期以来一直被认为在酸化过程中表现为惰性。最近的研究表明,CO2的存在动态地改变了虫孔模式和酸效率的行为。采用合成模拟技术对该过程进行了深入的了解。本研究使用了一个经过验证的成分数值模型,该模型能够在已发表的文献中描述的全水环境中复制核心尺度水平的酸化实验。将该数值模型扩展到三相环境,并应用于现场尺度,以监测和评价碳酸盐酸化过程中演化CO2的影响。通过具有径向坐标的数值模型,在现场规模情景中测试了实验室规模的经验教训。与人们普遍认为的相反,1000 psi及以上的高孔隙压力不足以将所有析出的二氧化碳保持在溶液中。CO2作为分离相的存在阻碍了酸的效率。演化出的CO2只存在于破坏带附近,很少穿透储层基质。基于现场规模模型的预测,本研究保证了在实验室水平上进行酸化实验,在近井区域面临的压力、温度和盐度条件完全相似,并敦促应用成分建模技术来考虑二氧化碳的演化,同时研究和预测基质酸化作业。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Dynamics of Wettability Alteration from Alkali/Nanoparticles/Polymer Flooding - Integrating Data of Imbibition, Contact Angle and Interfacial-Tension to Screen Injection Agents Benchmarking and Field-Testing of the Distributed Quasi-Newton Derivative-Free Optimization Method for Field Development Optimization Aplicability of an Innovative and Light Seismic Approach to Monitor SAGD Operations in Surmont: A Blind Test Four Simple Questions: Decision-Centered Risk and Project Management Gas Migration in Wellbores During Pressurized Mud Cap Drilling PMCD
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1