Apophanies or Epiphanies? How Crawlers Impact Our Understanding of the Web

Syed Suleman Ahmad, Muhammad Daniyal Dar, Muhammad Fareed Zaffar, N. Vallina-Rodriguez, Rishab Nithyanand
{"title":"Apophanies or Epiphanies? How Crawlers Impact Our Understanding of the Web","authors":"Syed Suleman Ahmad, Muhammad Daniyal Dar, Muhammad Fareed Zaffar, N. Vallina-Rodriguez, Rishab Nithyanand","doi":"10.1145/3366423.3380113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Data generated by web crawlers has formed the basis for much of our current understanding of the Internet. However, not all crawlers are created equal and crawlers generally find themselves trading off between computational overhead, developer effort, data accuracy, and completeness. Therefore, the choice of crawler has a critical impact on the data generated and knowledge inferred from it. In this paper, we conduct a systematic study of the trade-offs presented by different crawlers and the impact that these can have on various types of measurement studies. We make the following contributions: First, we conduct a survey of all research published since 2015 in the premier security and Internet measurement venues to identify and verify the repeatability of crawling methodologies deployed for different problem domains and publication venues. Next, we conduct a qualitative evaluation of a subset of all crawling tools identified in our survey. This evaluation allows us to draw conclusions about the suitability of each tool for specific types of data gathering. Finally, we present a methodology and a measurement framework to empirically highlight the differences between crawlers and how the choice of crawler can impact our understanding of the web.","PeriodicalId":20754,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of The Web Conference 2020","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of The Web Conference 2020","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3366423.3380113","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

Data generated by web crawlers has formed the basis for much of our current understanding of the Internet. However, not all crawlers are created equal and crawlers generally find themselves trading off between computational overhead, developer effort, data accuracy, and completeness. Therefore, the choice of crawler has a critical impact on the data generated and knowledge inferred from it. In this paper, we conduct a systematic study of the trade-offs presented by different crawlers and the impact that these can have on various types of measurement studies. We make the following contributions: First, we conduct a survey of all research published since 2015 in the premier security and Internet measurement venues to identify and verify the repeatability of crawling methodologies deployed for different problem domains and publication venues. Next, we conduct a qualitative evaluation of a subset of all crawling tools identified in our survey. This evaluation allows us to draw conclusions about the suitability of each tool for specific types of data gathering. Finally, we present a methodology and a measurement framework to empirically highlight the differences between crawlers and how the choice of crawler can impact our understanding of the web.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
灵光乍现还是顿悟?爬虫如何影响我们对网络的理解
网络爬虫生成的数据构成了我们目前对互联网理解的基础。然而,并不是所有的爬虫都是平等的,爬虫通常会在计算开销、开发人员工作、数据准确性和完整性之间进行权衡。因此,爬虫的选择对生成的数据和从中推断出的知识有着至关重要的影响。在本文中,我们对不同爬虫所提供的权衡进行了系统研究,并对这些可能对各种类型的测量研究产生的影响进行了研究。我们做出了以下贡献:首先,我们对自2015年以来在主要安全和互联网测量场所发表的所有研究进行了调查,以确定和验证针对不同问题领域和出版场所部署的爬行方法的可重复性。接下来,我们对调查中确定的所有爬行工具的一个子集进行定性评估。这种评估使我们能够得出关于每种工具对特定类型数据收集的适用性的结论。最后,我们提出了一种方法和测量框架,以经验强调爬虫之间的差异,以及选择爬虫如何影响我们对网络的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Gone, Gone, but Not Really, and Gone, But Not forgotten: A Typology of Website Recoverability Those who are left behind: A chronicle of internet access in Cuba Towards Automated Technologies in the Referencing Quality of Wikidata Companion of The Web Conference 2022, Virtual Event / Lyon, France, April 25 - 29, 2022 WWW '21: The Web Conference 2021, Virtual Event / Ljubljana, Slovenia, April 19-23, 2021
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1