Single-Leg Stance Times in a Diverse Group of Survivors of Cancer and the Relationship to History of Recent Falls

IF 1 Q4 ONCOLOGY Rehabilitation Oncology Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1097/01.REO.0000000000000243
Ryan J. Marker, R. Kakar, Jared J. Scorsone, J. Peters, W. Purcell
{"title":"Single-Leg Stance Times in a Diverse Group of Survivors of Cancer and the Relationship to History of Recent Falls","authors":"Ryan J. Marker, R. Kakar, Jared J. Scorsone, J. Peters, W. Purcell","doi":"10.1097/01.REO.0000000000000243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Balance impairments are present in cancer survivors for many reasons and increase risk of falls, though specific investigation of these impairments, and assessments to identify them, is not widely reported. Objective: Describe the performance of a large diverse cancer survivor population on a single-leg stance (SLS) test and assess relationships between this test and clinical and patient characteristics, including recent falls. Methods: This was a retrospective cross-sectional study. Data were collected from baseline assessments of 412 cancer survivors joining a clinical exercise program. Measurements: The primary outcome was an SLS test, performed with eyes opened and closed. Clinical and patient characteristics included age, body mass index (BMI), gender, cancer diagnosis and treatment, quality of life (QOL), and a recent history of falls (within the past 6 weeks). Results: Approximately one-third of the population was unable to reach 30 seconds on at least one leg with eyes open. Age and BMI had a negative influence on SLS with eyes open, while only age had a negative influence with eyes closed, in participants impaired in these conditions (N = 137 and N = 254, respectively). QOL was not related to SLS. SLS identified participants with a recent history of falls (sensitivity = 0.83; specificity = 0.58). Limitations: This population was biased, determined by provider referral or participant choice to join. The population was diverse in cancer diagnoses and treatment, limiting subgroup observations. Conclusions: Cancer survivors demonstrate a wide range of performance on the SLS test, which may show promise as a screen for fall risk.","PeriodicalId":54153,"journal":{"name":"Rehabilitation Oncology","volume":"15 1","pages":"23 - 30"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rehabilitation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.REO.0000000000000243","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: Balance impairments are present in cancer survivors for many reasons and increase risk of falls, though specific investigation of these impairments, and assessments to identify them, is not widely reported. Objective: Describe the performance of a large diverse cancer survivor population on a single-leg stance (SLS) test and assess relationships between this test and clinical and patient characteristics, including recent falls. Methods: This was a retrospective cross-sectional study. Data were collected from baseline assessments of 412 cancer survivors joining a clinical exercise program. Measurements: The primary outcome was an SLS test, performed with eyes opened and closed. Clinical and patient characteristics included age, body mass index (BMI), gender, cancer diagnosis and treatment, quality of life (QOL), and a recent history of falls (within the past 6 weeks). Results: Approximately one-third of the population was unable to reach 30 seconds on at least one leg with eyes open. Age and BMI had a negative influence on SLS with eyes open, while only age had a negative influence with eyes closed, in participants impaired in these conditions (N = 137 and N = 254, respectively). QOL was not related to SLS. SLS identified participants with a recent history of falls (sensitivity = 0.83; specificity = 0.58). Limitations: This population was biased, determined by provider referral or participant choice to join. The population was diverse in cancer diagnoses and treatment, limiting subgroup observations. Conclusions: Cancer survivors demonstrate a wide range of performance on the SLS test, which may show promise as a screen for fall risk.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同癌症幸存者的单腿站立时间及其与近期跌倒史的关系
背景:由于多种原因,平衡障碍存在于癌症幸存者中,并增加了跌倒的风险,尽管对这些障碍的具体调查和评估并没有广泛报道。目的:描述大量不同癌症幸存者在单腿站立(SLS)测试中的表现,并评估该测试与临床和患者特征(包括最近跌倒)之间的关系。方法:回顾性横断面研究。数据是从412名参加临床锻炼项目的癌症幸存者的基线评估中收集的。测量:主要结果是SLS测试,在睁眼和闭眼的情况下进行。临床和患者特征包括年龄、体重指数(BMI)、性别、癌症诊断和治疗、生活质量(QOL)和近期跌倒史(过去6周内)。结果:大约三分之一的人在睁开眼睛的情况下,至少有一条腿无法达到30秒。在这些条件下受损的参与者中,年龄和BMI对睁眼时的SLS有负面影响,而只有年龄对闭眼时的SLS有负面影响(N = 137和N = 254)。生活质量与SLS无关。SLS识别出近期有跌倒史的参与者(敏感性= 0.83;特异性= 0.58)。局限性:这个人群是有偏见的,由提供者推荐或参与者选择加入。人群在癌症诊断和治疗方面存在差异,限制了亚组观察。结论:癌症幸存者在SLS测试中表现出广泛的表现,这可能显示出作为跌倒风险筛查的希望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
22.20%
发文量
48
期刊最新文献
Assessment of rehabilitation practices during hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in the United States: a survey. Indocyanine Green Lymphography in Conservative Lymphedema Therapy: A Scoping Review A Review of Late Effects in Pediatric Cancer: Implications for Rehabilitation The Psychological and Biological Benefits of Mind-Body Therapy Interventions for Informal Caregivers of Individuals With Cancer: A Systematic Review The Effect of Inspiratory Muscle Training in Patients With Lung Cancer After Surgery: A Systematic Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1