Does the Use of Personal Protection Equipment for the Medical Staff Working with Patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019 Need to be Revised

Ahmadshah Farhat, A. Mohamadzadeh, R. Saeidi, Negar Yeganeh Khorasani
{"title":"Does the Use of Personal Protection Equipment for the Medical Staff Working with Patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019 Need to be Revised","authors":"Ahmadshah Farhat, A. Mohamadzadeh, R. Saeidi, Negar Yeganeh Khorasani","doi":"10.22038/IJN.2021.51449.1910","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Personal protective equipment (PPE) is one of the protective equipment that health workers can use to protect themselves against coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19); however, it is accompanied by some problems for medical staff. Since severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is not transmitted through healthy skin, the hypothesis was examined as to whether the cotton gown could be used instead of PPE. Methods: The medical staff of the Neonatal Care Unit took care of 51 patients with 1180 shifts. During the first and a half months, the medical personnel used a special PPE package for providing care of  patients, which included an air-impermeable plastic gown with a head-to-toe cover, an N95 mask, gloves, and a face shield. However, from the beginning of the epidemic, doctors used cotton surgical gowns instead of the ones in the package. Following that, the nursing team gradually replaced the air-impermeable plastic gowns with cotton surgical gowns, and finally, all the staff used the cotton gowns.  Results: After three months, all medical staff was evaluated for clinical signs of COVID-19, such as fever, cough, nausea, and headache. During these three months, no symptoms or absence due to illness were observed in the staff. It should be mentioned that the antibody titer was not evaluated at the end of the study. Conclusion: A retrospective review of the staff showed that the cotton surgical gown protected the staff against COVID-19. Accordingly, the cotton surgical gown can be used in medical centers to replace PPE sets containing an air-impermeable plastic gown with a head-to-toe cover. The result of this study can improve some of the problems of the medical staff.","PeriodicalId":14584,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Neonatology IJN","volume":"42 1","pages":"102-104"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Neonatology IJN","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22038/IJN.2021.51449.1910","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Personal protective equipment (PPE) is one of the protective equipment that health workers can use to protect themselves against coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19); however, it is accompanied by some problems for medical staff. Since severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is not transmitted through healthy skin, the hypothesis was examined as to whether the cotton gown could be used instead of PPE. Methods: The medical staff of the Neonatal Care Unit took care of 51 patients with 1180 shifts. During the first and a half months, the medical personnel used a special PPE package for providing care of  patients, which included an air-impermeable plastic gown with a head-to-toe cover, an N95 mask, gloves, and a face shield. However, from the beginning of the epidemic, doctors used cotton surgical gowns instead of the ones in the package. Following that, the nursing team gradually replaced the air-impermeable plastic gowns with cotton surgical gowns, and finally, all the staff used the cotton gowns.  Results: After three months, all medical staff was evaluated for clinical signs of COVID-19, such as fever, cough, nausea, and headache. During these three months, no symptoms or absence due to illness were observed in the staff. It should be mentioned that the antibody titer was not evaluated at the end of the study. Conclusion: A retrospective review of the staff showed that the cotton surgical gown protected the staff against COVID-19. Accordingly, the cotton surgical gown can be used in medical centers to replace PPE sets containing an air-impermeable plastic gown with a head-to-toe cover. The result of this study can improve some of the problems of the medical staff.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与2019冠状病毒病患者接触的医务人员个人防护装备的使用是否需要修改
背景:个人防护装备(PPE)是卫生工作者可以用来保护自己免受2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)感染的防护装备之一;然而,这也给医务人员带来了一些问题。由于严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2型(SARS-CoV-2)不会通过健康的皮肤传播,因此对是否可以使用棉衣代替个人防护装备的假设进行了检验。方法:新生儿监护室医护人员对51例患者进行1180次轮班护理。在最初的一个半月里,医务人员使用了一套特殊的个人防护装备来为患者提供护理,其中包括一件从头到脚都覆盖着的不透气塑料长袍、N95口罩、手套和面罩。然而,从疫情开始,医生就使用棉质手术服,而不是包装里的。随后,护理团队逐渐将不透气的塑料手术衣换成了棉质手术衣,最终所有工作人员都使用了棉质手术衣。结果:3个月后,对所有医务人员进行了COVID-19临床体征评估,如发烧、咳嗽、恶心、头痛等。在这三个月期间,没有观察到工作人员出现任何症状或因病缺勤。应该提到的是,在研究结束时没有评估抗体滴度。结论:对医护人员的回顾性调查显示,棉质手术衣对医护人员的COVID-19有一定的保护作用。因此,棉质手术服可在医疗中心使用,以取代含有从头到脚覆盖的不透气塑料罩衣的个人防护装备。本研究的结果可以改善医务人员的一些问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Radiofrequency Ablation of Umbilical Cord for Reduction of Twin Reversed Arterial Perfusion Sequence: A Case Series Early-Onset Neonatal Sepsis: A Retrospective Study among 1,119 Moroccan Newborns Admitted to the National Reference Center in Neonatology and Nutrition, Rabat, Morocco Association of Neuregulin Levels and Neuregulin-1 Polymorphism with Short-term Morbidities in Preterm Neonates Caudal regression syndrome: A case report and literature of review Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on health of preterm infants in Iran
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1