What’s in the Cloud? - An examination of the impact of cloud storage usage on the browser cache

IF 0.6 Q4 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Journal of Digital Forensics Security and Law Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.15394/JDFSL.2020.1592
G. Horsman
{"title":"What’s in the Cloud? - An examination of the impact of cloud storage usage on the browser cache","authors":"G. Horsman","doi":"10.15394/JDFSL.2020.1592","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cloud storage is now a well established and popular service adopted by many individuals and organizations, often at a scaled cost, with free accounts also available. It provides users with the ability to store content on a cloud service provider’s infrastructure, offering the benefit of redundancy, reliability, security, the flexibility of access, and the potential assumed the liability of the provider for data loss within the contexts of a licensing agreement. Consequently, this form of remote storage provides a regulatory challenge as content which once resided upon a seized digital exhibit, available for scrutiny during a digital forensic investigatory, may no longer be present where attempting to acquire access to it creates costing and juridical difficulties. This article offers a digital forensic examination of trace-evidence left in the Internet browser cache following cloud storage account usage and interaction. Following interactions with Dropbox and Google Drive in the Chrome browser, testing demonstrates the possibility to recover data capable of facilitating a partial reconstruction of a user’s cloud storage account, with results offered and contextualized.","PeriodicalId":43224,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Digital Forensics Security and Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Digital Forensics Security and Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15394/JDFSL.2020.1592","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Cloud storage is now a well established and popular service adopted by many individuals and organizations, often at a scaled cost, with free accounts also available. It provides users with the ability to store content on a cloud service provider’s infrastructure, offering the benefit of redundancy, reliability, security, the flexibility of access, and the potential assumed the liability of the provider for data loss within the contexts of a licensing agreement. Consequently, this form of remote storage provides a regulatory challenge as content which once resided upon a seized digital exhibit, available for scrutiny during a digital forensic investigatory, may no longer be present where attempting to acquire access to it creates costing and juridical difficulties. This article offers a digital forensic examination of trace-evidence left in the Internet browser cache following cloud storage account usage and interaction. Following interactions with Dropbox and Google Drive in the Chrome browser, testing demonstrates the possibility to recover data capable of facilitating a partial reconstruction of a user’s cloud storage account, with results offered and contextualized.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
云里有什么?-检查云存储使用对浏览器缓存的影响
云存储现在是一种成熟且受欢迎的服务,被许多个人和组织采用,通常需要一定的成本,也可以使用免费帐户。它使用户能够将内容存储在云服务提供商的基础设施上,从而提供冗余、可靠性、安全性、访问灵活性等好处,并且在许可协议的背景下,提供商可能会承担数据丢失的责任。因此,这种形式的远程存储带来了监管挑战,因为曾经驻留在被查获的数字证物上的内容,在数字法医调查期间可以进行审查,可能不再存在,因为试图获取它会产生成本和司法困难。本文提供了在云存储帐户使用和交互后留在互联网浏览器缓存中的痕迹证据的数字法医检查。在Chrome浏览器中与Dropbox和Google Drive进行交互后,测试证明了恢复数据的可能性,这些数据能够促进用户云存储帐户的部分重建,并提供结果和上下文。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Digital Forensics Security and Law
Journal of Digital Forensics Security and Law COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
A CRITICAL COMPARISON OF BRAVE BROWSER AND GOOGLE CHROME FORENSIC ARTEFACTS Fault Lines In The Application Of International Humanitarian Law To Cyberwarfare To License or Not to License Reexamined: An Updated Report on Licensing of Digital Examiners Under State Private Investigator Statutes Forensic Discoverability of iOS Vault Applications A Combined Approach For Private Indexing Mechanism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1