{"title":"Protection of gait data set for preserving its privacy in deep learning pipeline","authors":"Anubha Parashar, Rajveer Singh Shekhawat","doi":"10.1049/bme2.12093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Human gait is a biometric that is being used in security systems because it is unique for each individual and helps recognise one from a distance without any intervention. To develop such a system, one needs a comprehensive data set specific to the application. If this data set somehow falls in the hands of rogue elements, they can easily access the secured system developed based on the data set. Thus, the protection of the gait data set becomes essential. It has been learnt that systems using deep learning are easily prone to hacking. Hence, maintaining the privacy of gait data sets in the deep learning pipeline becomes more difficult due to adversarial attacks or unauthorised access to the data set. One of the popular techniques for stopping access to the data set is using anonymisation. A reversible gait anonymisation pipeline that modifies gait geometry by morphing the images, that is, texture modifications, is proposed. Such modified data prevent hackers from making use of the data set for adversarial attacks. Nine layers were proposedto effect geometrical modifications, and a fixed gait texture template is used for morphing. Both these modify the gait data set so that any authentic person cannot be identified while maintaining the naturalness of the gait. The proposed method is evaluated using the similarity index as well as the recognition rate. The impact of various geometrical and texture modifications on silhouettes have been investigated to identify the modifications. The crowdsourcing and machine learning experiments were performed on the silhouette for this purpose. The obtained results in both types of experiments showed that texture modification has a stronger impact on the level of privacy protection than geometry shape modifications. In these experiments, the similarity index achieved is above 99%. These findings open new research directions regarding the adversarial attacks and privacy protection related to gait recognition data sets.</p>","PeriodicalId":48821,"journal":{"name":"IET Biometrics","volume":"11 6","pages":"557-569"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ietresearch.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1049/bme2.12093","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IET Biometrics","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1049/bme2.12093","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Human gait is a biometric that is being used in security systems because it is unique for each individual and helps recognise one from a distance without any intervention. To develop such a system, one needs a comprehensive data set specific to the application. If this data set somehow falls in the hands of rogue elements, they can easily access the secured system developed based on the data set. Thus, the protection of the gait data set becomes essential. It has been learnt that systems using deep learning are easily prone to hacking. Hence, maintaining the privacy of gait data sets in the deep learning pipeline becomes more difficult due to adversarial attacks or unauthorised access to the data set. One of the popular techniques for stopping access to the data set is using anonymisation. A reversible gait anonymisation pipeline that modifies gait geometry by morphing the images, that is, texture modifications, is proposed. Such modified data prevent hackers from making use of the data set for adversarial attacks. Nine layers were proposedto effect geometrical modifications, and a fixed gait texture template is used for morphing. Both these modify the gait data set so that any authentic person cannot be identified while maintaining the naturalness of the gait. The proposed method is evaluated using the similarity index as well as the recognition rate. The impact of various geometrical and texture modifications on silhouettes have been investigated to identify the modifications. The crowdsourcing and machine learning experiments were performed on the silhouette for this purpose. The obtained results in both types of experiments showed that texture modification has a stronger impact on the level of privacy protection than geometry shape modifications. In these experiments, the similarity index achieved is above 99%. These findings open new research directions regarding the adversarial attacks and privacy protection related to gait recognition data sets.
IET BiometricsCOMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
33 weeks
期刊介绍:
The field of biometric recognition - automated recognition of individuals based on their behavioural and biological characteristics - has now reached a level of maturity where viable practical applications are both possible and increasingly available. The biometrics field is characterised especially by its interdisciplinarity since, while focused primarily around a strong technological base, effective system design and implementation often requires a broad range of skills encompassing, for example, human factors, data security and database technologies, psychological and physiological awareness, and so on. Also, the technology focus itself embraces diversity, since the engineering of effective biometric systems requires integration of image analysis, pattern recognition, sensor technology, database engineering, security design and many other strands of understanding.
The scope of the journal is intentionally relatively wide. While focusing on core technological issues, it is recognised that these may be inherently diverse and in many cases may cross traditional disciplinary boundaries. The scope of the journal will therefore include any topics where it can be shown that a paper can increase our understanding of biometric systems, signal future developments and applications for biometrics, or promote greater practical uptake for relevant technologies:
Development and enhancement of individual biometric modalities including the established and traditional modalities (e.g. face, fingerprint, iris, signature and handwriting recognition) and also newer or emerging modalities (gait, ear-shape, neurological patterns, etc.)
Multibiometrics, theoretical and practical issues, implementation of practical systems, multiclassifier and multimodal approaches
Soft biometrics and information fusion for identification, verification and trait prediction
Human factors and the human-computer interface issues for biometric systems, exception handling strategies
Template construction and template management, ageing factors and their impact on biometric systems
Usability and user-oriented design, psychological and physiological principles and system integration
Sensors and sensor technologies for biometric processing
Database technologies to support biometric systems
Implementation of biometric systems, security engineering implications, smartcard and associated technologies in implementation, implementation platforms, system design and performance evaluation
Trust and privacy issues, security of biometric systems and supporting technological solutions, biometric template protection
Biometric cryptosystems, security and biometrics-linked encryption
Links with forensic processing and cross-disciplinary commonalities
Core underpinning technologies (e.g. image analysis, pattern recognition, computer vision, signal processing, etc.), where the specific relevance to biometric processing can be demonstrated
Applications and application-led considerations
Position papers on technology or on the industrial context of biometric system development
Adoption and promotion of standards in biometrics, improving technology acceptance, deployment and interoperability, avoiding cross-cultural and cross-sector restrictions
Relevant ethical and social issues