Critical velocity estimates running velocity in a 10-km running race in recreational runners

H. Corrêa, H. Ribeiro, V. A. Cunha, V. Baiao, Wallace Muniz de Melo, Renato N. Braga Ferreira, T. H. Viana, R. Neves, A. Ferreira
{"title":"Critical velocity estimates running velocity in a 10-km running race in recreational runners","authors":"H. Corrêa, H. Ribeiro, V. A. Cunha, V. Baiao, Wallace Muniz de Melo, Renato N. Braga Ferreira, T. H. Viana, R. Neves, A. Ferreira","doi":"10.1590/1980-0037.2020v22e59852","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The aim of this study was to compare the estimated running velocity in a critical velocity (CV) test with the real running velocity in a 10-km race. This is a cross-sectional study with a convenience sample of 34 runners, 20 males and 14 females (42,4 ± 11,0). The participants attended two days of testing and one day to participate in an official 10-km race. During the visits, the following tests were performed: i) 400-meter running track test and ii) 2000 meter running track test. They were randomly selected and held in official athletics track with at least 48 hours rest between them. The athletes were instructed to participate in the study properly recovered, fed and hydrated. The CV was calculated as the linear relation between distance and race time, corresponding to the slope of the linear regression line. Both tests occurred in similar climatic situations. We found good agreement between the velocities estimated through the CV test and the real running velocity of a 10-km race. Although there was a difference in velocities estimated by the CV test and the real 10-km race, the variation delta was low. Thus, these data indicate that the CV test seems to be a good tool for estimating the velocity of a 10-km race. The CV determined in the field with two fixed distances 400 and 2000 meter was valid to estimate the running velocity of a 10-km race.","PeriodicalId":38989,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humano","volume":"59 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humano","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-0037.2020v22e59852","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract The aim of this study was to compare the estimated running velocity in a critical velocity (CV) test with the real running velocity in a 10-km race. This is a cross-sectional study with a convenience sample of 34 runners, 20 males and 14 females (42,4 ± 11,0). The participants attended two days of testing and one day to participate in an official 10-km race. During the visits, the following tests were performed: i) 400-meter running track test and ii) 2000 meter running track test. They were randomly selected and held in official athletics track with at least 48 hours rest between them. The athletes were instructed to participate in the study properly recovered, fed and hydrated. The CV was calculated as the linear relation between distance and race time, corresponding to the slope of the linear regression line. Both tests occurred in similar climatic situations. We found good agreement between the velocities estimated through the CV test and the real running velocity of a 10-km race. Although there was a difference in velocities estimated by the CV test and the real 10-km race, the variation delta was low. Thus, these data indicate that the CV test seems to be a good tool for estimating the velocity of a 10-km race. The CV determined in the field with two fixed distances 400 and 2000 meter was valid to estimate the running velocity of a 10-km race.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
临界速度是指休闲运动员在10公里赛跑中奔跑的速度
摘要本研究的目的是比较临界速度(CV)测试中估计的跑步速度与10公里比赛中的实际跑步速度。这是一项横断面研究,有34名跑步者,20名男性和14名女性(42,4±11,0)。参与者参加了两天的测试和一天的正式10公里比赛。参观期间进行了以下试验:1)400米跑道试验和2)2000米跑道试验。他们被随机挑选,并被安排在官方田径跑道上,其间至少休息48小时。参与研究的运动员被要求适当地恢复、进食和补水。CV计算为距离与比赛时间的线性关系,对应线性回归线的斜率。两项试验都是在类似的气候条件下进行的。我们发现通过CV测试估计的速度与10公里比赛的实际跑步速度之间有很好的一致性。虽然CV测试估计的速度与实际10公里比赛的速度存在差异,但变化增量很低。因此,这些数据表明CV测试似乎是估计10公里比赛速度的好工具。在400米和2000米两个固定距离的场地上测定的CV可以有效地估计10公里比赛的跑步速度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: The Brazilian Journal of Kinanthropometry and Human Performance is a journal of Physical Education, Kinesiology, Sport and related areas, whose focus is human movement, being reviewed by an international panel of peers, with emphasis on the measurement of the man in its morphological and functional aspects, as well as conditioning factors of physical performance. Given the multidisciplinary nature of the journal, these areas of study are approached in several contexts, with interactions with social, behavioral, health and environmental aspects. The journal publishes original articles as well as relevant Review/Update articles and Points of View.
期刊最新文献
Talent identification and development in Olympic triathlon: a perspective from Brazilian coaches Factors associated with the practice of physical activity among university students in social isolation during the covid-19 pandemic Association of sex and training phase with physical activity and sedentary behavior in nursing students Influence of walking and running on patellofemoral pain The applicability of the Visceral Adiposity Index (VAI) for predicting visceral fat
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1