Understanding adaptogens: The action that evades us

Sophia Gerontakos, J. Wardle, D. Casteleijn
{"title":"Understanding adaptogens: The action that evades us","authors":"Sophia Gerontakos, J. Wardle, D. Casteleijn","doi":"10.33235/AJHNM.31.2.60-63","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Adaptogens are among the most common class of herbal medicines prescribed by herbalists today, and the term is rapidly disseminating into the wider community. Yet, despite the ubiquitous use of adaptogens in clinical practice, there is very little research available which clearly defines the mechanism of action. Although definitions have been proposed, no single definition has been agreed upon by researchers. It appears that the polyvalent action of adaptogens cannot be measured from a conventional pharmacological paradigm of single receptor-based perception of drug action, when adaptogens likely have a multi-targeted action on multiple receptor sites. The multi-target action has been a limiting factor in the progression of clinical trials as the most appropriate method to measure adaptogens remains unknown. Adaptogen is a key concept in Western herbal medicine, with roots spanning more than a century. Bridging the gap between clinical use of this concept and clinical data is long overdue. For this to happen, steps need to be taken to initiate the process of standardisation of the term, as is being seen with other traditional medicine concepts being formalised by the World Health Organization (WHO). This begins with consensus on the definition and a thorough examination of the mechanism of action from a broader pharmacological perspective.","PeriodicalId":8640,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Herbal and Naturopathic Medicine","volume":"108 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Herbal and Naturopathic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33235/AJHNM.31.2.60-63","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Adaptogens are among the most common class of herbal medicines prescribed by herbalists today, and the term is rapidly disseminating into the wider community. Yet, despite the ubiquitous use of adaptogens in clinical practice, there is very little research available which clearly defines the mechanism of action. Although definitions have been proposed, no single definition has been agreed upon by researchers. It appears that the polyvalent action of adaptogens cannot be measured from a conventional pharmacological paradigm of single receptor-based perception of drug action, when adaptogens likely have a multi-targeted action on multiple receptor sites. The multi-target action has been a limiting factor in the progression of clinical trials as the most appropriate method to measure adaptogens remains unknown. Adaptogen is a key concept in Western herbal medicine, with roots spanning more than a century. Bridging the gap between clinical use of this concept and clinical data is long overdue. For this to happen, steps need to be taken to initiate the process of standardisation of the term, as is being seen with other traditional medicine concepts being formalised by the World Health Organization (WHO). This begins with consensus on the definition and a thorough examination of the mechanism of action from a broader pharmacological perspective.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
理解适应原:逃避我们的行为
适应原是当今草药医生开出的最常见的草药之一,这个术语正在迅速传播到更广泛的社区。然而,尽管在临床实践中普遍使用适应原,但很少有研究可以明确定义其作用机制。虽然已经提出了定义,但没有一个单一的定义得到研究人员的同意。适应原的多价作用似乎不能从传统的基于单一受体的药物作用感知的药理学范式来衡量,因为适应原可能在多个受体位点上具有多靶向作用。多靶点作用一直是临床试验进展的一个限制因素,因为测量适应原最合适的方法仍然未知。适应原(Adaptogen)是西方中草药中的一个重要概念,其历史可以追溯到一个多世纪以前。这一概念的临床应用和临床数据之间的差距早就应该弥合了。为此,需要采取步骤,启动该术语的标准化进程,正如世界卫生组织(卫生组织)正在正式确定其他传统医学概念所看到的那样。这始于对定义的共识和从更广泛的药理学角度对作用机制的彻底检查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
期刊最新文献
The effect of zucchini (Cucurbita pepo) seed oil on the severity of nipple fissures and pain in breastfeeding women: a randomised controlled trial protocol Efficacy of tea tree oil (Melaleuca alternifolia) on knee osteoarthritis: case series A systematic review on the clinical significance of nutraceuticals for weight loss Impact of COVID‑19 on public health in Karachi, Pakistan President’s message: Advancing naturopathy through knowledge and collaboration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1