“We are still here”: the stories of Syrian academics in exile

IF 1 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH International Journal of Comparative Education and Development Pub Date : 2018-08-20 DOI:10.1108/IJCED-06-2018-0013
Tom Parkinson, T. Zoubir, Shaher Abdullateef, Musallam Abedtalas, Ghana Alyamani, Ziad A Ibrahim, Majdi Al Husni, Fuad Alhaj Omar, Hamoud Hajhamoud, Fadi Iboor, Husam Allito, M. Jenkins, Abdulkader Rashwani, Adnan Sennou, Fateh Shaban
{"title":"“We are still here”: the stories of Syrian academics in exile","authors":"Tom Parkinson, T. Zoubir, Shaher Abdullateef, Musallam Abedtalas, Ghana Alyamani, Ziad A Ibrahim, Majdi Al Husni, Fuad Alhaj Omar, Hamoud Hajhamoud, Fadi Iboor, Husam Allito, M. Jenkins, Abdulkader Rashwani, Adnan Sennou, Fateh Shaban","doi":"10.1108/IJCED-06-2018-0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this paper is twofold: first, to generate insight into the experiences of Syrian academics in exile in Turkey; and second, to explore approaches to collaboration and community building among academics in exile and with counterparts in the international academic community.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe study employs a hybrid visual-autobiographical narrative methodology, embedded within a large group process (LGP) design.\n\n\nFindings\nFindings are presented in two phases: the first phase presents a thematic analysis of narrative data, revealing the common and divergent experiences of 12 exiled academics. The second phase presents a reflective evaluation of undertaking the LGP and its implications for community building and sustaining Syrian academia in exile.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nWhile this is a qualitative study with a small participant group, and therefore does not provide a basis for statistical generalisation, it offers rich insight into Syrian academics’ lived experiences of exile, and into strategies implemented to support the Syrian academic community in exile.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe study has practical implications for academic development in the contexts of conflict and exile; community building among dispersed academic communities; educational interventions by international NGOs and the international academic community; and group process design.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe study makes an original contribution to the limited literature on post-2011 Syrian higher education by giving voice to a community of exiled academics, and by critically evaluating a strategic initiative for supporting and sustaining Syrian academia. This represents significant, transferable insight for comparable contexts.\n","PeriodicalId":51967,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Comparative Education and Development","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Comparative Education and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCED-06-2018-0013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is twofold: first, to generate insight into the experiences of Syrian academics in exile in Turkey; and second, to explore approaches to collaboration and community building among academics in exile and with counterparts in the international academic community. Design/methodology/approach The study employs a hybrid visual-autobiographical narrative methodology, embedded within a large group process (LGP) design. Findings Findings are presented in two phases: the first phase presents a thematic analysis of narrative data, revealing the common and divergent experiences of 12 exiled academics. The second phase presents a reflective evaluation of undertaking the LGP and its implications for community building and sustaining Syrian academia in exile. Research limitations/implications While this is a qualitative study with a small participant group, and therefore does not provide a basis for statistical generalisation, it offers rich insight into Syrian academics’ lived experiences of exile, and into strategies implemented to support the Syrian academic community in exile. Practical implications The study has practical implications for academic development in the contexts of conflict and exile; community building among dispersed academic communities; educational interventions by international NGOs and the international academic community; and group process design. Originality/value The study makes an original contribution to the limited literature on post-2011 Syrian higher education by giving voice to a community of exiled academics, and by critically evaluating a strategic initiative for supporting and sustaining Syrian academia. This represents significant, transferable insight for comparable contexts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“我们还在这里”:叙利亚流亡学者的故事
PurposeThe本文的目的是双重的:首先,生成洞察叙利亚流亡学者在土耳其的经验;第二,探索流亡学者之间以及与国际学术界同行之间的合作和社区建设方法。设计/方法/方法本研究采用视觉-自传体混合叙事方法,嵌入在大群体过程(LGP)设计中。研究结果分为两个阶段:第一阶段对叙事数据进行专题分析,揭示12位流亡学者的共同和不同经历。第二阶段对开展LGP及其对社区建设和维持流亡叙利亚学术界的影响进行反思性评估。虽然这是一个小参与者群体的定性研究,因此不能提供统计概括的基础,但它为叙利亚学者的流亡生活经验提供了丰富的见解,并为支持流亡的叙利亚学术界提供了实施的策略。本研究对冲突与流亡背景下的学术发展具有现实意义;分散学术团体的社区建设;国际非政府组织和国际学术界的教育干预;以及分组流程设计。独创性/价值本研究通过向流亡学者群体发出声音,并通过批判性地评估支持和维持叙利亚学术界的战略举措,对2011年后叙利亚高等教育的有限文献做出了原创性贡献。这代表了对可比上下文的重要的、可转移的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
期刊最新文献
A critical evaluation of the validity of socioeconomic measures used in PISA Envisioning quality education for sustainability transformation in teacher education: perspectives from an international dialogue on Sustainable Development Goal 4 Vedic mathematics for sustainable knowledge: a systematic literature review Educational aspirations of school adolescents in Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan: how are these aspirations shaped? Reasonable adjustment for inclusive development: a cautionary case study of Australian VET teachers’ experience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1