Public opinion and practice towards COVID-19 pandemic in Libya

Sara A. Almeraash, A. Amara
{"title":"Public opinion and practice towards COVID-19 pandemic in Libya","authors":"Sara A. Almeraash, A. Amara","doi":"10.53986/ibjm.2021.0054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: World Health Organization declared COVID-19 as a pandemic, and like any global health crisis at its beginning, need a commitment to take the necessary precautions due to its spread among people before and during the presence of vaccine or drug. This study aims to assess public opinion and practice of Libyan community in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Materials and methods: A cross-sectional online study was conducted among Libyans between Sep. 15th, and Oct. 29th, 2020 using a developed-design questionnaire consisting of 23 questions assessing the aim of the study. 2305, who agreed to participate, was involved in the present study. Results: The response rate of Libyan regions, the west, east, middle and south areas, was 80.0%, 8.7%, 10.0 % and 1.3%, respectively. The majority were female (63.1%), with mostly in the 20-50 years’ age group (86.6%). The high level of education was university graduate (71.3%). The opinion average rate of participants was 33.2 % disagree and 26.4 % strongly disagree towards ban measures issued by authorities. Findings reveal good practice of applying preventive measures (always, an average rate of 35.1%). The relationship between opinion score and the participant’s demographic data show highly significant difference with the educational level (P = 0.002), but no differences found with residence (P = 0.183), with age (P = 0.212), and with gender (P = 0.313). With regard to the practice score, a significant difference was existed with gender (P = 0.029), age (P = 0.000), level of education (P = 0.013) and residence (P = 0.000). Conclusions: Libyan people has an acceptable level of awareness and opinion in applying the necessary precautionary measures towards COVID-19 pandemic, where prevention practices are influenced by level of education, residence, age and gender.","PeriodicalId":13190,"journal":{"name":"Iberoamerican Journal of Medicine","volume":"130 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iberoamerican Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53986/ibjm.2021.0054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: World Health Organization declared COVID-19 as a pandemic, and like any global health crisis at its beginning, need a commitment to take the necessary precautions due to its spread among people before and during the presence of vaccine or drug. This study aims to assess public opinion and practice of Libyan community in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Materials and methods: A cross-sectional online study was conducted among Libyans between Sep. 15th, and Oct. 29th, 2020 using a developed-design questionnaire consisting of 23 questions assessing the aim of the study. 2305, who agreed to participate, was involved in the present study. Results: The response rate of Libyan regions, the west, east, middle and south areas, was 80.0%, 8.7%, 10.0 % and 1.3%, respectively. The majority were female (63.1%), with mostly in the 20-50 years’ age group (86.6%). The high level of education was university graduate (71.3%). The opinion average rate of participants was 33.2 % disagree and 26.4 % strongly disagree towards ban measures issued by authorities. Findings reveal good practice of applying preventive measures (always, an average rate of 35.1%). The relationship between opinion score and the participant’s demographic data show highly significant difference with the educational level (P = 0.002), but no differences found with residence (P = 0.183), with age (P = 0.212), and with gender (P = 0.313). With regard to the practice score, a significant difference was existed with gender (P = 0.029), age (P = 0.000), level of education (P = 0.013) and residence (P = 0.000). Conclusions: Libyan people has an acceptable level of awareness and opinion in applying the necessary precautionary measures towards COVID-19 pandemic, where prevention practices are influenced by level of education, residence, age and gender.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利比亚应对新冠肺炎疫情的舆论与实践
导言:世界卫生组织宣布COVID-19为大流行,与任何全球卫生危机开始时一样,由于其在疫苗或药物存在之前和期间在人群中传播,需要承诺采取必要的预防措施。本研究旨在评估2019冠状病毒病大流行背景下利比亚社区的公众舆论和做法。材料和方法:在2020年9月15日至10月29日期间,在利比亚人中进行了一项横断面在线研究,使用了一份由23个问题组成的开发设计问卷,评估了研究的目的。2305名同意参与的人参与了本研究。结果:利比亚西部、东部、中部和南部地区的应答率分别为80.0%、8.7%、10.0%和1.3%。以女性居多(63.1%),以20 ~ 50岁年龄组居多(86.6%)。学历较高的是大学毕业生(71.3%)。参与者的平均意见率为33.2%不同意,26.4%强烈不同意当局发布的禁令措施。调查结果显示采取预防措施的良好做法(总是,平均比率为35.1%)。意见得分与被调查者人口学资料的关系在受教育程度上存在极显著差异(P = 0.002),而在居住地(P = 0.183)、年龄(P = 0.212)和性别(P = 0.313)之间无显著差异。在实践得分方面,性别(P = 0.029)、年龄(P = 0.000)、文化程度(P = 0.013)、居住地(P = 0.000)存在显著差异。结论:利比亚人民对COVID-19大流行采取必要的预防措施的认识和意见水平可接受,其中预防措施受教育程度、居住地、年龄和性别的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Antibiotic resistance and adherence to clinical guidelines in the Emergency Department. Are we doing it right? MicroRNAs and their role in newborn weight Age dependence of chemical element contents in normal human breast investigated using inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry Use of stem cell-enriched fat grafts in facial reconstruction: have they demonstrated superiority over autologous fat grafting? Cerebral tuberculomas: manifestation of extrapulmonary tuberculosis in an immunocompromised patient. A case report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1