Jason D. Thompson, J. D. Xidos, Timothy M. Sonbuchner, C. Cramer, D. Truhlar
{"title":"More reliable partial atomic charges when using diffuse basis sets","authors":"Jason D. Thompson, J. D. Xidos, Timothy M. Sonbuchner, C. Cramer, D. Truhlar","doi":"10.1039/B206369G","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We present a method that alleviates some of the sensitivity to the inclusion of diffuse basis functions when calculating partial atomic charges from a Lowdin population analysis. This new method locally redistributes that part of the Lowdin population that comes from diffuse basis functions so that the final charges closely resemble those calculated without diffuse functions. We call this method the redistributed Lowdin population analysis (RLPA). The method contains one parameter for each atomic number, and we optimized the parameter for the 6-31+G(d) basis set. The method has been tested on compounds that contain H, Li, C, N, O, F, Si, P, S, Cl, and Br. For a test set of 398 compounds with experimental and high-level theoretical dipole moments, the dipole moments derived from the charges obtained by standard Lowdin population analysis have errors 35% larger than those obtained by the corresponding RLPA using the same basis set. In judging the quality of the RLPA with respect to the test set of dipole moments, we have also found that dipole moments derived from Mulliken population analysis have errors 120% larger than those derived from RLPA for the same basis set. The new method is particularly successful for the 207 systems containing only first row atoms (H, C, N, O, F) for which the errors in the dipole moments computed from the partial atomic charges obtained by standard Lowdin and Mulliken analysis are respectively 115 and 419% larger than those obtained by RLPA.","PeriodicalId":20106,"journal":{"name":"PhysChemComm","volume":"5 1","pages":"117-134"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"37","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PhysChemComm","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1039/B206369G","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 37
Abstract
We present a method that alleviates some of the sensitivity to the inclusion of diffuse basis functions when calculating partial atomic charges from a Lowdin population analysis. This new method locally redistributes that part of the Lowdin population that comes from diffuse basis functions so that the final charges closely resemble those calculated without diffuse functions. We call this method the redistributed Lowdin population analysis (RLPA). The method contains one parameter for each atomic number, and we optimized the parameter for the 6-31+G(d) basis set. The method has been tested on compounds that contain H, Li, C, N, O, F, Si, P, S, Cl, and Br. For a test set of 398 compounds with experimental and high-level theoretical dipole moments, the dipole moments derived from the charges obtained by standard Lowdin population analysis have errors 35% larger than those obtained by the corresponding RLPA using the same basis set. In judging the quality of the RLPA with respect to the test set of dipole moments, we have also found that dipole moments derived from Mulliken population analysis have errors 120% larger than those derived from RLPA for the same basis set. The new method is particularly successful for the 207 systems containing only first row atoms (H, C, N, O, F) for which the errors in the dipole moments computed from the partial atomic charges obtained by standard Lowdin and Mulliken analysis are respectively 115 and 419% larger than those obtained by RLPA.
我们提出了一种方法,当从洛丁族分析计算部分原子电荷时,减轻了对包含扩散基函数的一些敏感性。该方法局部重新分配了由漫射基函数得到的部分洛丁种群,使最终电荷与没有漫射基函数的计算结果非常接近。我们称这种方法为再分布洛丁种群分析(RLPA)。该方法为每个原子序数包含一个参数,我们针对6-31+G(d)基集优化了该参数。该方法已在含有H、Li、C、N、O、F、Si、P、S、Cl和Br的化合物上进行了测试。对于398个具有实验偶极矩和高水平理论偶极矩的化合物的测试集,用标准洛丁种群分析得到的电荷偶极矩的误差比使用相同基集的相应RLPA得到的误差大35%。在判断RLPA相对于偶极矩测试集的质量时,我们还发现,在相同的基集上,由Mulliken总体分析得出的偶极矩比由RLPA得出的偶极矩误差大120%。新方法对只包含第一行原子(H, C, N, O, F)的207个体系特别成功,用标准洛丁和Mulliken分析得到的部分原子电荷计算的偶极矩误差分别比RLPA计算的误差大115和419%。