Distributional Preferences and Ego Depletion

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 ECONOMICS Journal of Neuroscience Psychology and Economics Pub Date : 2018-09-01 DOI:10.1037/npe0000082
Loukas Balafoutas, Rudolf Kerschbamer, Regine Oexl
{"title":"Distributional Preferences and Ego Depletion","authors":"Loukas Balafoutas, Rudolf Kerschbamer, Regine Oexl","doi":"10.1037/npe0000082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"By means of a laboratory experiment with 508 participants, we study the impact of ego depletion on revealed distributional preferences. Subjects are exposed to a social preference identification procedure in 2 consecutive weeks. In the treatment intervention, they accomplish an ego-depletion task before being exposed to the procedure in 1 of the 2 weeks, and in the control intervention they accomplish a control task. Half of the subjects are exposed to the intervention in Week 1 and the other half in Week 2. Our design allows us to cleanly identify 3 separate effects on social preferences: (a) the effect of exposing subjects to the social preference identification procedure a second time, (b) the effect of the intervention per se, and (c) the effect of ego depletion in particular. We find that only the intervention per se has an effect on social preferences for some types, whereas the ego-depletion task does not have a significant effect compared with the control task, and preferences display a considerable degree of stability over time.","PeriodicalId":45695,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuroscience Psychology and Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuroscience Psychology and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/npe0000082","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

By means of a laboratory experiment with 508 participants, we study the impact of ego depletion on revealed distributional preferences. Subjects are exposed to a social preference identification procedure in 2 consecutive weeks. In the treatment intervention, they accomplish an ego-depletion task before being exposed to the procedure in 1 of the 2 weeks, and in the control intervention they accomplish a control task. Half of the subjects are exposed to the intervention in Week 1 and the other half in Week 2. Our design allows us to cleanly identify 3 separate effects on social preferences: (a) the effect of exposing subjects to the social preference identification procedure a second time, (b) the effect of the intervention per se, and (c) the effect of ego depletion in particular. We find that only the intervention per se has an effect on social preferences for some types, whereas the ego-depletion task does not have a significant effect compared with the control task, and preferences display a considerable degree of stability over time.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
分配偏好与自我损耗
通过一项有508名参与者的实验,我们研究了自我损耗对揭示的分配偏好的影响。被试连续两周接受社会偏好识别程序。在治疗干预中,他们在两周中的一周内完成了自我消耗任务,在对照组干预中,他们完成了一个控制任务。一半的受试者在第一周接受干预另一半在第二周接受干预。我们的设计使我们能够清楚地识别出3种对社会偏好的独立影响:(a)第二次将受试者暴露于社会偏好识别程序的影响,(b)干预本身的影响,以及(c)特别是自我消耗的影响。我们发现只有干预本身对某些类型的社会偏好有影响,而自我消耗任务与控制任务相比没有显著影响,并且偏好随时间的推移显示出相当程度的稳定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
28.60%
发文量
18
期刊最新文献
Self-reported and electroencephalogram responses to evaluate sponsorship congruence efficacy. Is geographical location really dead in the online world? An event-related potentials study. Motivating risky choices increases risk taking. Supplemental Material for From Genes to Performance: Dopaminergic Modulation of Decision Making in a Stock Market Simulation Supplemental Material for Motivating Risky Choices Increases Risk Taking
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1