Financial Performance in Islamic Banking and Shari’ah Supervision under Interventionist Regulatory Approach: A System-GMM Dynamic Panel Analysis

IF 0.4 Q4 ECONOMICS Turkish Journal of Islamic Economics-TUJISE Pub Date : 2021-02-15 DOI:10.26414/A095
Naji Mansour Nomran, Razali Haron
{"title":"Financial Performance in Islamic Banking and Shari’ah Supervision under Interventionist Regulatory Approach: A System-GMM Dynamic Panel Analysis","authors":"Naji Mansour Nomran, Razali Haron","doi":"10.26414/A095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The relationship between Shari’ah supervision and Islamic banks’ (IBs) performance is still ambiguous particularly for banks across countries that have different regulatory environments. Pakistan adopts an interventionist regulatory approach which is exclusive to Shari’ah governance (SG) system in Pakistan. This approach differs from the other adopted approaches in countries that have either high or low degree of regulatory interference. Thus, this study examines how Shari’ah supervision mechanism, as represented by the Shari’ah supervisory board, and its characteristics, can influence the performance of IBs in Pakistan. The sample comprises 67 Islamic bank-year observations for the period from 2007 to 2015. The performance-governance relationship is estimated using a range of econometric techniques including the dynamic system-GMM estimator. The results reveal modest support for a positive association between Shari’ah supervision and performance. The study concludes that SG practices in the Pakistani IBs still suffer from some drawbacks which require more improvements by the respective regulators. Most of these drawbacks are related to the SG regulatory frameworks which are related to the SSBs’ roles and characteristics.","PeriodicalId":53787,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Islamic Economics-TUJISE","volume":"45 17 1","pages":"59-86"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Islamic Economics-TUJISE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26414/A095","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

The relationship between Shari’ah supervision and Islamic banks’ (IBs) performance is still ambiguous particularly for banks across countries that have different regulatory environments. Pakistan adopts an interventionist regulatory approach which is exclusive to Shari’ah governance (SG) system in Pakistan. This approach differs from the other adopted approaches in countries that have either high or low degree of regulatory interference. Thus, this study examines how Shari’ah supervision mechanism, as represented by the Shari’ah supervisory board, and its characteristics, can influence the performance of IBs in Pakistan. The sample comprises 67 Islamic bank-year observations for the period from 2007 to 2015. The performance-governance relationship is estimated using a range of econometric techniques including the dynamic system-GMM estimator. The results reveal modest support for a positive association between Shari’ah supervision and performance. The study concludes that SG practices in the Pakistani IBs still suffer from some drawbacks which require more improvements by the respective regulators. Most of these drawbacks are related to the SG regulatory frameworks which are related to the SSBs’ roles and characteristics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
干预主义监管下的伊斯兰银行财务绩效与伊斯兰教法监管:系统- gmm动态面板分析
伊斯兰教法监管与伊斯兰银行(IBs)绩效之间的关系仍然模糊不清,特别是对于监管环境不同的国家的银行而言。巴基斯坦采取干预主义的监管方式,这是巴基斯坦伊斯兰教治理(SG)体系所独有的。这种方法不同于在管制干预程度高或低的国家采用的其他方法。因此,本研究考察了以伊斯兰教法监事会为代表的伊斯兰教法监督机制及其特征如何影响巴基斯坦ib的绩效。样本包括2007年至2015年期间67个伊斯兰银行年度观察结果。使用包括动态系统- gmm估计器在内的一系列计量经济学技术来估计绩效治理关系。研究结果显示,伊斯兰教法监督与绩效之间存在积极联系。该研究的结论是,巴基斯坦银行的SG实践仍然存在一些缺陷,需要各自的监管机构进行更多的改进。这些缺点大多与SG监管框架有关,这些框架与ssb的角色和特征有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
期刊最新文献
The Ottoman Economy (1870-1913): Preliminary Second-Generation Estimates The Role of Agent in Islamic Financing: A Critique Conformity of Islamic Banks with AAOIFI Standards for General Presentation and Disclosure in Turkey and Bahrain Looking at the ‘Big Picture’ in Islamic Economics and Finance Literature: A Bibliometric Analysis of WoS Indexed Documents Muslims and Non-Muslims’ Satisfaction of the Islamic Insurance in Malaysia: Application of the Extended Customer Satisfaction Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1